Kaká

[termninja 5,290]

Everyone is saying our squad is old, and now we are to sign 29 almost 30 years old player? Nope, it would be a wrong move to be honest. Better get Pastore or Hamsik for that kind of money...

[Kostas 1,468]

In this season we realised that he cant even play in the same level Kalou play.

I'll bite.

When exactly did he prove that?

[Henrique 9,133]

I'll bite.

When exactly did he prove that?

He was loaned to Fulham, where hes not even a starting XI. Kalou would easily be.

Im not saying he doesnt have potential to be better than Kalou, but right hes not, and nobody knows If he will be one day.

[Kostas 1,468]

He was loaned to Fulham, where hes not even a starting XI. Kalou would easily be.

In that case your opinion on Fulham's attacking options and Kalou clearly differs from mine.

[eldo 868]

He is only 17. I know. I see lot of potential in this boy, but did you see what the guy said ? "Josh is way better than Kaká". How can a 17 years old boy can be better than Kaká ? Thats stupid. Im not downplaying him, Im just saying we have to be realistic, and dont expect too much of our youngster. Its just put pressure on him.

I see in a post something like that "Kakuta is our answear to Messi". This is stupid, really stupid. I think its funny, because if you say that Kakuta is "Chelsea´s Messi", you only can expect him to destroy the opponents in important games, but when some supporters says he is not playing well, somebody will say "oh, he is only 18". Gimme a break, you say he is the new Messi, and now you are saying we have to pe patient. The guy say Josh is better than Kaká, and if he made some mistakes he will say that its because hes only 17, and we have to be patient.

YOU must be patient, and think twice before posting this kind of madness: "Kakuta is the answear to Messi" and "Josh is better than Kaká". This is what piss me off, because with all the talk about the youngster, we end up paying stupid amount of money in a striker.

This was a :goodpost:

We seem to agree about those comparisons.

What Huges thinks about Kakuta.

"I have been really impressed by him," Hughes said. "I was aware of him as a young player, but you need to work with a player closely and understand an individual and what he can bring in terms of skill and style of play.

"But straight awa as soon as he walked into the building you could tell he had quality, fantastic feet and great awareness, He could have scored one or two goals, but he created chances.

"He will have a decent impact against the right opposition."

[J.F. 1,484]

don't need him!

[Ollie 4,400]

Kaka is 28, has 3-4 years left at a top level. That's good enough for me.

[Term-X 7,891]

Kaka is 28, has 3-4 years left at a top level. That's good enough for me.

He will be 29 by the time next season gets underway.

Like Deco, Kaka is done. Literally, his best years are over. Like LDN was saying in another thread.

Hamsik & Pastore are the type of players we need.

[HRiver 1,512]

We definitely don't need Kaka. His time has gone and I don't think he'll ever be as good as he used to be back in his Milan days.

We should get younger midfielders, not old ones. The squad is old enough already.

[Henrique 9,133]

I never believed we were going to pay 50m for Torres, now media is reporting we will buy Kaká in the summer. It would be another stupid move, imo. Kaká is a Real Madrid flops, why in the hell would we try to sign him ??

[Gianfranco_Z 202]

Kaka has been injured for a long time. Believe it or not being injured does not make you a flop. You are physically unable to play in the first team.

[chrismada9 1,948]

We definitely don't need Kaka.

It's not that we don't need him! We definitely need some sort of playmaker in our squad, just not him! And yes I agree he's getting old now!