Jump to content

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Frank Lampard


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Atomiswave said:

We would never do that, Griezzman was rathger good under him. Simeone could def work here, his tactics and organiation well needed. But Yeah cant see it happening. If we dont improve come december he is gone our FL, its a race for us and udt for Poch imo.

Greizman was an anomaly, pretty much every flair player that's played under Simeone regressed to horrendous levels (Lemar, Correa,Felix, Gelson, Carrasco).

Say what you want about Lampard's overall management but he's already above Simeone on that (developing attacking players) regard through Pulisic alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem with Frank is that we're still making the same mistakes as last season, there's no improvement. 
Also, when you spend £230m, you're going to have more pressure and scrutiny. We should be criticising Lampard and how he sets his team up, the decisions he makes. Pochettino didn't spend this that's why it's different situations you're comparing. Chelsea also aren't Tottenham. 
Of course we will make the same mistakes when the same GK plays lol.

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Skipper said:

My problem with Frank is that we're still making the same mistakes as last season, there's no improvement. 

Also, when you spend £230m, you're going to have more pressure and scrutiny. We should be criticising Lampard and how he sets his team up, the decisions he makes. Pochettino didn't spend this that's why it's different situations you're comparing. Chelsea also aren't Tottenham. 

I don't disagree i'm more arguing the narrative that Pochettino's Spurs success was a clear obvious thing from the get go, it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, killer1257 said:

Both are not true DMs like for instance Makelele was.

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
 

I dont know why people find it hard to comprehend...says it all why were after Rice all summer through though I dont rate him at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know why people find it hard to comprehend...says it all why were after Rice all summer through though I dont rate him at all...
I know. Rice made sense for several reasons, even though I also think he is not worth more than 50 million Euros.
Jorgi and Kante double pivot is also not going to work. Sadly, we do not have a no. 6 in our youth that could play that role either.

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, killer1257 said:

Both are not true DMs like for instance Makelele was.

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
 

Lampard has conceded 63 goals in about 43 premier league games with chelsea. That is an absolute disaster. 

Even at Derby the defending was this bad, but we thought his defenders there were poor, that he needed better players. As you can see, with better players in Chelsea, he still flops in defence.

Southampton had more shots, created more chances and dominated us from the 35th minute. It's unacceptable, either he lays out the plan that we are a counter attacking team who concedes possession to even the smallest of teams, or he tells the team to be more controlled in possession. 

These ping pong games he's playing is getting pretty annoying now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lampard has conceded 63 goals in about 43 premier league games with chelsea. That is an absolute disaster. 
Even at Derby the defending was this bad, but we thought his defenders there were poor, that he needed better players. As you can see, with better players in Chelsea, he still flops in defence.
Southampton had more shots, created more chances and dominated us from the 35th minute. It's unacceptable, either he lays out the plan that we are a counter attacking team who concedes possession to even the smallest of teams, or he tells the team to be more controlled in possession. 
These ping pong games he's playing is getting pretty annoying now.
Maybe Derby had a better keeper than Kepa lol

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Greizman was an anomaly, pretty much every flair player that's played under Simeone regressed to horrendous levels (Lemar, Correa,Felix, Gelson, Carrasco).

Say what you want about Lampard's overall management but he's already above Simeone on that (developing attacking players) regard through Pulisic alone.

I dont know Tomo, maybe he is. But Simeone is def much better at other aspects. Simeone wont work wonders with this team I agree but we will def be much harder to beat and score against overall. He aint coming here anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Atomiswave said:

I dont know Tomo, maybe he is. But Simeone is def much better at other aspects. Simeone wont work wonders with this team I agree but we will def be much harder to beat and score against overall. He aint coming here anyway.

But at what cost? All our attacking players bar at a push Werner would look completely average playing that football, it would be an utterly ludicrous waste of talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

Maybe Derby had a better keeper than Kepa lol

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
 

Maybe lol.

But its just crazy. Sarri had this same backline and Kepa and we were not nearly as bad as this in defence. Lampard has to show some progress in our style of play, 43 League games with us and I'm still waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe lol.
But its just crazy. Sarri had this same backline and Kepa and we were not nearly as bad as this in defence. Lampard has to show some progress in our style of play, 43 League games with us and I'm still waiting.
Yes, but we played Sarri ball and that was the tactic to just pass the ball around til Hazard scores a goal. So, we rarely lost the ball and mistakes like Havertz today did not happen. We mostly conceded set piece goals when Sarri was here and those goals we conceded at the beginning of the second half

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, killer1257 said:

Yes, but we played Sarri ball and that was the tactic to just pass the ball around til Hazard scores a goal. So, we rarely lost the ball and mistakes like Havertz today did not happen. We mostly conceded set piece goals when Sarri was here and those goals we conceded at the beginning of the second half

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk
 

Wouldn't be against a bit of Sarriball right now, where we just pass the ball around to death. Might actually help us from pressing the self destruct button!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...