didierforever 7,349 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 But Porto already accepted to sell him last summer for 23mi euro to Spurs, the problem was on his wage. I honestly believe he will cost something around what Schurrle is.Maybe, but I would better cash in on him and go with Ake or Chabolah and a new DM. My opinion though.Luiz and Subotic would be killer, he is one of the best CBs in the world and he is kind of a sheriff. I dont think we need to get rid of anyone, just add another CB. Terry basically doesnt count anymore...i know that this is true, but it hurts so bad... but its true. JT is not the JT of old. Rmpr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 does anyone like tino costa of valencia? sainttourist 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Gundogan is a real promise. Still, his position is key for us. I like the concept but i also think I want a battle proven for that position. Bad timing for Chelsea maybe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Lol when we buy Cavani for 35mio and Moutinho for 20 I will drive you all the way from brasil to SB to watch them play. Just the two of them will cost around 80mio. Realise this is 2013 and football prices are inflated like hell. Actually spurs had a bid of 20m accepted for moutinho and if it wasnt for his wages he would have been a spurs player right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 FOrgot about Marcelo. Yes he was brilliant so far, but had problems with injuries this season.Marcelo or Fabio would be fantastic buys for Chelsea. They could provide width and depth at multiple positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Actually spurs had a bid of 20m accepted for moutinho and if it wasnt for his wages he would have been a spurs player right now.Relax, he doesnt know what he is talking about. Too focused on his FM prices! Mufassir08 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Relax, he doesnt know what he is talking about. Too focused on his FM prices!You do know that when Chelsea is involved price goes up for 10mio?Owner of player knows we have money and they will want most of it. Porto who is putting prices up even further (especualy for Chelsea, Rm,...) will sell Moutinho (their best current player) for 20mio. Same money as we will pay for Schurle?If you realy belive we could get Moutinho for 20mio lol, spurs might, but we are not spurs are we? We would pay 20mio for Schurle (I believe you think he might come here for 12mio) and he is not half the player Moutinho is.BUt ok it your thinking...Ps: I dont play Fm...I do fifa however... Korea 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,983 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 The Sun has stooped to a new level of low with this sub story lol.- 'Wayne Rooneys future has again been thrown into doubt after being subbed 19 minutes from time in the 2-2 draw against West Ham'http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/premierleague/story/chelsea-holds-talks-with-manuel-pellegrini-representatives-malaga-coach-041813?m_n=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 You do know that when Chelsea is involved price goes up for 10mio?Owner of player knows we have money and they will want most of it. Porto who is putting prices up even further (especualy for Chelsea, Rm,...) will sell Moutinho (their best current player) for 20mio. Same money as we will pay for Schurle?If you realy belive we could get Moutinho for 20mio lol, spurs might, but we are not spurs are we? We would pay 20mio for Schurle (I believe you think he might come here for 12mio) and he is not half the player Moutinho is.BUt ok it your thinking...Ps: I dont play Fm...I do fifa however...They don't understand the "Chelsea Tax." Perfect Example, Oscar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backstreet09 499 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Get Suarez, Leewa, Schurrle, Modrich, Khedira, Dante.Sell Torres, Mikel, Marko lad, Brana.Get rid of Benayoun, Paulo, Malouda, Hilario.You can call me a dreamer, oh wait, that's what I'm Stingray 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 They don't understand the "Chelsea Tax." Perfect Example, Oscar.LOOOOOOOOOL!Do you think Oscar would have been sold for less than 25mi? With Inter not needing the money (look at Damiao)? They just sold him to us because the offer was too good to be true...I find it quite funny your Brazilian examples to try to explain certain things. The only problem is that they are usually very wrong and misinformed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 LOOOOOOOOOL!Do you think Oscar would have been sold for less than 25mi? With Inter not needing the money (look at Damiao)? They just sold him to us because the offer was too good to be true...I find it quite funny your Brazilian examples to try to explain certain things. The only problem is that they are usually very wrong and misinformed.Look at what.... Where is Damiao??????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Look at what.... Where is Damiao???????At Internacional, because Spurs want to pay low money to get him out!Your Oscar example is ridiculous. We didnt pay 25mi because we are Chelsea, anybody would have had to pay that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 At Internacional, because Spurs want to pay low money to get him out!Your Oscar example is ridiculous. We didnt pay 25mi because we are Chelsea, anybody would have had to pay that much.Ummmm. did you see the Spurs offer? Did any other team offer for Oscar??? Chelsea pays more for players because clubs know they have the finances/resources too. It's a pretty simple concept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedWhite&BLUE 37 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 What I think is most realistic:Out: Malouda, Benayoun, Lampard, Paulo, Hilario, Turnbull, Essien, TorresIn: Lewandowski, Schurrle, Khedira (w/Mourinho), BegovicLoaned: KDB (Bayer part of Schurrle deal), Piazon (Championship), Lukaku (Prem), Courtouis (Atletico)A lot can happen between now and the end of the season however that can shake things up. Also these moves are assuming Moruinho comes back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Ummmm. did you see the Spurs offer? Did any other team offer for Oscar??? Chelsea pays more for players because clubs know they have the finances/resources too. It's pretty simple to concept.Every big club pays more then, which is weird because they are the only ones buying top players, so it makes things contraditory!Many Russian teams made offers for Oscar and they were all around 15-20mi. By your logic, they would have bought him, because they have no "Chelsea tax". Same goes for Damiao. Spurs offered around 15mi and because they have no "Chelsea tax", it should have been enough, right?Your logic goes for new sugar daddies like ManCity, PSG and Zenit. Chelsea is already a big club wi a very strong worldwide brand. We are in a position where we might even be able to pay less money in a fight with PSG or Spurs, because players want to come to Chelsea despite the wage, it gives prestige! Backstreet09 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Every big club pays more then, which is weird because they are the only ones buying top players, so it makes things contraditory!Many Russian teams made offers for Oscar and they were all around 15-20mi. By your logic, they would have bought him, because they have no "Chelsea tax"...Who are the many Russian teams???? Anzhi and Zenit? They pay a tax too... Look at Hulk and Willain... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Who are the many Russian teams???? Anzhi and Zenit? They pay a tax too... Look at Hulk and Willain...You surely know what you are talking about, right?It was CSKA who offered 16.5mi and then Anzhi came saying they would cover anything they would offer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 You surely know what you are talking about, right?It was CSKA who offered 16.5mi and then Anzhi came saying they would cover anything they would offer...Please link me to your claims... Also, you mean Roman's other club??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Please link me to your claims... I already explained it...Your logic goes for new sugar daddies like ManCity, PSG and Zenit. Chelsea is already a big club with a very strong worldwide brand. We are in a position where we might even be able to pay less money in a fight with PSG or Spurs, because players want to come to Chelsea despite the wage, it gives them prestige! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.