The Skipper 20,609 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 16 minutes ago, BlueLyon said: Not keen on buying him, but we wont be paying100m for him. He refused the contract already and will be on last year. 60m will be the highest. It would be stupid when we haggle for every deal about every other player, but simply let everton rape us with that 100m price and take it. Yep. For £50~£60m it's ok. I think we might haggle it down even further. FabHazard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 I don't get why people here don't want lukaku. I like costa but he said he wanted to leave twice last year. If a player do that unless you are at hazard level, you ship him out.  mashimaru161 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 11 hours ago, Bernard N Y Burgesson said: i bet you that is the same thing solanke will do to us. as a matter of fact i would rub it right in so you will see the mistake you committed. At least if chelsea had inserted a buy back clause he would have had the idea that we do care but no like we did to others(de bruyne, solanke, ryan bertrand) go f**k yourself is what we told them.I love this club but they deserve what is coming for them. I dont know who invented this system they use. We are just creating haters for ourselve but world class players for others. Why don't we use the barca youth system where the kids are not forced to believe they have a place in the team, they are just there to learn how to play football their way. De bruyne and betrand were sold by the same manager. mashimaru161 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mashimaru161 77 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 37 minutes ago, The Skipper said: Yep. For £50~£60m it's ok. I think we might haggle it down even further. Don't hold your beath then. Everton can play hard to get after latest incident especially DYC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 11 hours ago, The Skipper said: And he did the right thing. I don't think he was saying otherwise buddy. All he was trying to point out is that Lukaku did not act very loyal or acted in a way that showed more loyalty. What did Lukaku showed at Chelsea that reinforced he was not like any other player but he was a more then that and he was a fan? Nothing beside proclaiming he was. He is no worse or better then Cuardado in that regard. I do not criticize either player, both made a good decision. But neither player was loyal. The Chelsea fan argument is weak. Tomo, Rapkun, Blue-in-me-Veins and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 1 hour ago, BlueLyon said: Not keen on buying him, but we wont be paying100m for him. He refused the contract already and will be on last year. 60m will be the highest. It would be stupid when we haggle for every deal about every other player, but simply let everton rape us with that 100m price and take it. Although you have to take account of the Costa situation, publicly Costa has announced he is not wanted at Chelsea and a replacement is necessarily. This benefits Everton, they know that signing Lukaku is a must for Chelsea. I feel this will play out very long, and i do not see Chelsea paying over the odds immediately. Everton will hold out as long as they can to get the most money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Clockwork said: I don't think he was saying otherwise buddy. All he was trying to point out is that Lukaku did not act very loyal or acted in a way that showed more loyalty. What did Lukaku showed at Chelsea that reinforced he was not like any other player but he was a more then that and he was a fan? Nothing beside proclaiming he was. He is no worse or better then Cuardado in that regard. I do not criticize either player, both made a good decision. But neither player twas loyal. The Chelsea fan argument is weak. My point exactly. Lukaku leaving Chelsea actually worked out for the best. He played regularly and progressed into the player he is today, The club received a very high fee for him at the time, almost enough to cover what we paid for Diego Costa who lead Chelsea to their first title since 2010. He was young and needed to play more, said so himself. I understood completely. I'm just saying that makes him no different than any non-chelsea fan. Now if you think I'm too quick to judge him. He asked to leave, he got his wish granted. Did he need to publicly criticize the club afterwards? We've had non-fan players who were more respectful to the club after they left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 The interesting thing is that Everton can play the hard ball, while we are okay if they don't want to sell him this summer. We have another options, while they can stick with a rebel for another year. So yes, it is all up for them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adnane 1,101 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 The interesting thing is that Everton can play the hard ball, while we are okay if they don't want to sell him this summer. We have another options, while they can stick with a rebel for another year. So yes, it is all up for them now.Not sure about that, Lukaku's one and only preferred destination is Chelsea and if Everton can't convince of paying the price they demand there won't be much the player can do about it.They will simply explain to him that they are willing to let him leace but the only club he wants to go won't pay the price, thus making it eadier for them to keep him and not necessarily in a rebel mood. Hope we miraculously manage to snatch Morata under United's nose for 20 Million less somehow, that would be some business, I like the man and he has a lot of quality but is just not able to carry the lone striker position for a Champions League aspiring team by himself... Morata might not be either but he has at least shown his quality at the biggest stage once or twice. Cetting both and loaning Batshuayi would instantly put us back as titke favourites though, so many options. Envoyé de mon SM-A510F en utilisant Tapatalk RoyalBlues 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK-3001 286 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Are folk being too optmistic with Lukaku's pricing?  The Stones saga needs to be brought up, they were holding him even at 40 million pounds, there is no way they let Lukaku leave for 50-60 million pounds.  I am actually thinking it might be around 75 million pounds. Everton don't sell easily. mashimaru161, DYC. and akgw13 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 14 hours ago, Clockwork said: I don't think he was saying otherwise buddy. All he was trying to point out is that Lukaku did not act very loyal or acted in a way that showed more loyalty. What did Lukaku showed at Chelsea that reinforced he was not like any other player but he was a more then that and he was a fan? Nothing beside proclaiming he was. He is no worse or better then Cuardado in that regard. I do not criticize either player, both made a good decision. But neither player was loyal. The Chelsea fan argument is weak. At Chelsea, as a youngster, you don't get repaid for your loyalty. Amblève. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 53 minutes ago, The Skipper said: At Chelsea, as a youngster, you don't get repaid for your loyalty. Jose maybe abysmal at playing a youngster from scratch but he has shown with Rashford that he will play one's already proven after inheriting them (KDB aside). Factor in Costa's injury/suspensions and the impact Lukaku is capable of making from the bench, he would have got more than enough minutes in 14/15. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Tomo said: Jose maybe abysmal at playing a youngster from scratch but he has shown with Rashford that he will play one's already proven after inheriting them (KDB aside). Factor in Costa's injury/suspensions and the impact Lukaku is capable of making from the bench, he would have got more than enough minutes in 14/15. And now he is looking to replace Rashford with Morata and Belotti. Rashford was ostracized before Zlatan's injury, at best being played on the wing which is not his position. He needed Rashford, but won't need him the moment he gets his strikers. mashimaru161 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 9 hours ago, Adnane said:  Not sure about that, Lukaku's one and only preferred destination is Chelsea and if Everton can't convince of paying the price they demand there won't be much the player can do about it. They will simply explain to him that they are willing to let him leace but the only club he wants to go won't pay the price, thus making it eadier for them to keep him and not necessarily in a rebel mood. Hope we miraculously manage to snatch Morata under United's nose for 20 Million less somehow, that would be some business, I like the man and he has a lot of quality but is just not able to carry the lone striker position for a Champions League aspiring team by himself... Morata might not be either but he has at least shown his quality at the biggest stage once or twice. Cetting both and loaning Batshuayi would instantly put us back as titke favourites though, so many options. Envoyé de mon SM-A510F en utilisant Tapatalk  I am saying it, because he has refused to sign the new contract couple of months ago. The player himself want the move. Don't think we're that desperate to sign him at any price though. So if they stick with their asking price, they can keep him, no problem. We have another options. Lukaku maybe has the potential, but at the moment there are some strikers available better than him, with much more reasonable price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhead23 1,147 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 2 hours ago, Tomo said: Jose maybe abysmal at playing a youngster from scratch but he has shown with Rashford that he will play one's already proven after inheriting them (KDB aside). Factor in Costa's injury/suspensions and the impact Lukaku is capable of making from the bench, he would have got more than enough minutes in 14/15. I believe one of the reason of playing Rashford other than Zlatan's injury is also down to the people in the board and United has a strong presence of ex United people who would want to have certain tradition going for them. That could be the reason why Rashford got game time instead of Martial. Feel it is more of a forced thing rather than Jose wanting to develop ... like someone mention above they are looking to get the likes of Morata and Belloti despite having Rashford and Martial. mashimaru161 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Rashford will be a pure after thought once the deluded one gets his signings in. mashimaru161 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 22 hours ago, BlueLyon said: Not keen on buying him, but we wont be paying100m for him. He refused the contract already and will be on last year. 60m will be the highest. It would be stupid when we haggle for every deal about every other player, but simply let everton rape us with that 100m price and take it. That's not true. Lukaku's contract at Everton is running for another 2 years (until 2019). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, Amblève. said: That's not true. Lukaku's contract at Everton is running for another 2 years (until 2019). I think his point was that this is the last year everton will get serious money for him. Next year they have to sell him for a cut-price fee as it will be his last sumemr transfer window prior to his release. so if they do not want to miss out on like at least 40m they have t sell him this summer. mashimaru161, kellzfresh and BlueLyon 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekin 835 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 £60 mil would be very decent business, basically replacing Oscar with Lukaku if we just look at the transfer fees. Honestly it seems to me that Bakayoko and Lukaku are 100% signed, just details remaining to make it official (and waiting with the unveiling). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akgw13 867 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 13 hours ago, AK-3001 said: Are folk being too optmistic with Lukaku's pricing?  The Stones saga needs to be brought up, they were holding him even at 40 million pounds, there is no way they let Lukaku leave for 50-60 million pounds.  I am actually thinking it might be around 75 million pounds. Everton don't sell easily. I agree, it will be 70-75M pounds i think also. hit the bid at 70M everton and drive on, they are already spending that money with Pickford and Keane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.