Special Juan 28,730 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 Maybe, just maybe, that if he comes back the certain people behind the scenes at this club may start to understand that some players need a real good kick of the ball before actually shoving them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 541 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 Chelsea have told Everton that their next offer for Romelu Lukaku will be a take-it-or-leave-it offer (Times) #CFC #EFC Chelsea will not make another bid for Romelu Lukaku if the transfer is not completed this month (Times) #CFC #EFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 541 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 Everton are adamant they will not sell Romelu Lukaku for less than £75million (Times) #CFC #EFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Chels 2,502 Posted August 1, 2016 Popular Post! Share Posted August 1, 2016 Stay strong, Everton. We believe in you. The Mak, LondonsFinest, Ryan Fong and 14 others 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 If Everton don't accept a British transfer record sum for Rom, they are stupid. They were stupid not to accept 40m for Stones, who is only a moderatly above average player, last season, too so I could imagine them trying to keep hold even though he will never command such an inflated price again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 2 hours ago, Magic Lamps said: If Everton don't accept a British transfer record sum for Rom, they are stupid. They were stupid not to accept 40m for Stones, who is only a moderatly above average player, last season, too so I could imagine them trying to keep hold even though he will never command such an inflated price again. It seems like City will buy Stones for £50m so they won't be losing out there, but I seriously can't see any team bidding close to £70m for Lukaku next season... except us again maybe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Hybrid Angel 2,130 Posted August 1, 2016 Popular Post! Share Posted August 1, 2016 Don't know who is more daft us offering that much money or Everton asking for more. Blue-in-me-Veins, 1chelsea, kellzfresh and 9 others 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! DYC. 7,542 Posted August 1, 2016 Popular Post! Share Posted August 1, 2016 Somehow missed this noise. No, please. Capable of becoming a very good striker at best in a few years. Never world-class and never ever elite. Ridiculous money for a player of his calibre as well. I'm convinced he would've shunned Chelsea if other big clubs wanted him. Utd and Arsenal need(ed) a striker and didn't go for him. Same goes for Juve and Atletico. PSG could've used a striker but no. Remember his father talking about the likes of Bayern but it didn't quite happen. Nothing against Rom and I was happy for his personal succes at Everton but I just don't see how he makes the team better. Morata has a bit more to him for me and I wasn't a fan of that move either. I'd rather be patient and wait for a true world-class talent and spend stupid money on that player if needed. The Mak, Tomo, Blue-in-me-Veins and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unionjack 7,532 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 I say sod him! We got RLC and Remy. Who needs a proven PL striker that scores 20/25 a season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1chelsea 864 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 No please. that says a lot about us been a mid table team if we start looking to Everton direction not acceptable. who here will call it Anothony Martial and Lukaku are they on same level? United have him and still have Zlatan and we should go for Lukaku? well it your opinion and i respect it but if chelsea go for him then it a fail season already scargo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 3 hours ago, Unionjack said: I say sod him! We got RLC and Remy. Who needs a proven PL striker that scores 20/25 a season We have also got a technically superior striker from Belgium who doesn't wave his cock about demanding an unconditional starting place. MefiX19 and Unionjack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 4 hours ago, The Chels said: It seems like City will buy Stones for £50m so they won't be losing out there, but I seriously can't see any team bidding close to £70m for Lukaku next season... except us again maybe! Honestly, if we are insistent on giving money to Everton this summer id rather it was Stones. Im convinced he will be world class, the fact we already have Zouma and Andreas is the only reason I'm not madly campaigning to get him. The Chels 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unionjack 7,532 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 7 hours ago, Tomo said: We have also got a technically superior striker from Belgium who doesn't wave his cock about demanding an unconditional starting place. Nowt wrong waving yer cock about if its summet to brag about. Theres alot of gifted people that needs their egos stroking continually. Way of the world. Its only when their egos are bigger than their skills they need a kick up the arse. Essien19 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanicus 5,208 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 When selling Lukaku to Everton, Chelsea put a clause in the contract which states that if he moves to another club for more than £28m and hits certain appearance and scoring targets for Everton (he did hit them!), Chelsea gets % of the transfer fee. We're using this clause now to demand discount. So we actually always pay less than it's said in the press, that's why Everton want more money, because they owe us some of it and will not get the full amount. Fulham Broadway 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artandur 939 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 44 minutes ago, Melanicus said: When selling Lukaku to Everton, Chelsea put a clause in the contract which states that if he moves to another club for more than £28m and hits certain appearance and scoring targets for Everton (he did hit them!), Chelsea gets % of the transfer fee. We're using this clause now to demand discount. So we actually always pay less than it's said in the press, that's why Everton want more money, because they owe us some of it and will not get the full amount. That clause could turn this thing into the next saga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,598 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,598 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 What a birthday present!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,730 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Deals are going to start triggering others anytime now I reckon. Sane to City, whilst he isn't a forward could well trigger Bony to Everton for Romelu Lukaku replacement. Stones to City will happen once Everton agree with Swansea for Ashley Williams and so on. Season is just around the corner and things will get hot in the coming days IMO. Essien19, Fernando, kellzfresh and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwi1691 255 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Interesting opionion from an Everton supporter on the shedend forum Quote Andy Hunter, who covers Everton matters closely for the Guardian and is based in Liverpool, insists that we haven't even received a single bid from you for Lukaku. He's very well informed and cautious, and doesn't normally print something like that without being quite certain. Personally, I'm inclined to believe him over the Mail, Express and Evening Standard, none of whom have any quotes or substance backing their articles. I know there's mixed opinion on here about paying somewhere in the £60-75m range for an ex-player that you sold, and also because a number of you just don't rate him that highly for the level you require, which is perfectly understandable. A number of our fans would agree with you (although the majority would prefer to keep him, I think, which is also my view). He's a very good player on his day, he does score goals and would get 20+ a season but as we all know he does have some limitations. Anyway, I'm mainly posting just to say, I don't think we'll be selling him. Stones to City is pretty much a done deal, and I don't think we'll sell both. Fernando, The Chels and Symbol123 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artandur 939 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 6 minutes ago, kiwi1691 said: Interesting opionion from an Everton supporter on the shedend forum Thats the same thing we heard from a leicester fan about kanté, a day before he signed, though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now