Stamford Bridge Thread

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

So we are moving?

It would seem so

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

No, but this statement is giving the evidence that SB cannot be expanded and if we want a bigger stadium then we must move. But no decision has been made to move yet.

It would seem so

Thanks... So it's only matter of time now, till the-CPO will fully convinced that there are not another option.

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

What I've been told is we will definitely be moving and that Battersea is the most likely destination.

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

Thanks... So it's only matter of time now, till the-CPO will fully convinced that there are not another option.

as i said earlier failing the council telling the CPO that the figures are incorrect there really is only one option

[Chelsea? 892]

What I've been told is we will definitely be moving and that Battersea is the most likely destination.

oh ok, so what's the time frame for all this? also, could Chelsea possible build bigger than 60,000 stadium?

If bathersea is not in the "rich" part of london, hopefully that means our games will be louder

[Madmax 9,219]

Stamford Bridge isn't actually in Chelsea ... is Battersea?

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

Stamford Bridge isn't actually in Chelsea ... is Battersea?

Battersea is the other side of the river. So further away.

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

as i said earlier failing the council telling the CPO that the figures are incorrect there really is only one option

The cpo said that the figures are incorrect?

i think that now they are convinced.

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

The cpo said that the figures are incorrect?

i think that now they are convinced.

no, the CPO basically said that whilst they, like most of us, wanted to remain at the bridge it seemed that the facts and figures Chels had provided had put an end to that but that they would still like to speak to the council for themselves to 'double check' so to speak.

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

no, the CPO basically said that whilst they, like most of us, wanted to remain at the bridge it seemed that the facts and figures Chels had provided had put an end to that but that they would still like to speak to the council for themselves to 'double check' so to speak.

ok lol i understand it before....

I meant the last meeting before this one...

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

ok lol i understand it before....

I meant the last meeting before this one...

oh, get you now

[Liquidator 5,176]

Stamford Bridge isn't actually in Chelsea ... is Battersea?

Its to the south/south east of Chelsea on the other side of the river but unlike Stamford Bridge it is within the Royal borough of Chelsea and Kensington (well where the stadium would be built is).

[Liquidator 5,176]

I'd much prefer us to look at Earls Court than Battersea

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

I'd much prefer us to look at Earls Court than Battersea

Its still an option tho isnt it

[Liquidator 5,176]

Its still an option tho isnt it

it is if we move quickly. Developers are trying to get planning permission to build flats on the Earls Court site

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

it is if we move quickly. Developers are trying to get planning permission to build flats on the Earls Court site

Thats right i remember reading that.

[zolayes 14,489]

Battersea could make a fantastic site

[Kezza 1,965]

Lol, Battersea. "We will dip our opponents in a Sea of Batter and deep fry them".

You reckon you could buy stuff from Stamford Bridge when it gets demolished? Like the front desk or a door?