xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said: When I was at our Charity Shield at Villa Park v Citeh, there was a group of Chinese bedecked in United paraphenalia. Ridiculous as it was they didn't deserve the kicking they got from Man City fans Citeh fans... oh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,327 Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 People have been trying to break in. Apparently there's a gym inside and a squirtle..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 1 minute ago, We Hate Scouse said: People have been trying to break in. Apparently there's a gym inside and a squirtle..... LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 1 minute ago, We Hate Scouse said: People have been trying to break in. Apparently there's a gym inside and a squirtle..... This whole Pokemon Go business is embarrassing. xPetrCechx, MefiX19 and The Chels 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Dan Levene @danlevene 17m17 minutes ago Story claiming Chelsea have applied for planning permission to demolish Stamford Bridge. It's true. As I reported last Nov when it happened. Here We Go! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 FFS! westham has a new stadium with 60K seats, sold out for their first game there yesterday, and they are paying only 2.5mil per year for him?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 51 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said: FFS! westham has a new stadium with 60K seats, sold out for their first game there yesterday, and they are paying only 2.5mil per year for him?! Have you seen the distance from the stands to the pitch though? It ruins it. Blue-in-me-Veins 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 1 hour ago, The Chels said: Have you seen the distance from the stands to the pitch though? It ruins it. Right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 On August 5, 2016 at 7:33 AM, The Chels said: Have you seen the distance from the stands to the pitch though? It ruins it. I hate stadium with that olympic like track around the pitch. But didn't the town force them to make the stadium multi-functional so that they'd pay for it? Or did their architects really think that would be a good stylistic choice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unionjack 7,531 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Great stuff Chelsea set to hold open training at home for the first time in a generation http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2016/8/7/12395124/chelsea-set-to-hold-open-training-at-home-for-the-first-time-in-a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted August 10, 2016 Share Posted August 10, 2016 On 06/08/2016 at 2:09 PM, Blue-in-me-Veins said: I hate stadium with that olympic like track around the pitch. But didn't the town force them to make the stadium multi-functional so that they'd pay for it? Or did their architects really think that would be a good stylistic choice? It was a requirement from Sport England that it can easily be converted back into athletics mode as and when they need it. The architects were not left with much choice due to the angle of seating needing to be different between football and athletics. The cheapest way of doing it was the shitty retractable seating in the photo Blue_Fox_, Unionjack, xPetrCechx and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinAshburner 1,270 Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 Chelsea have not kept a clean sheet at Stamford Bridge since November 2015 (9 months). #CFC The Last Time Chelsea keep a clean sheet at Home. http://www.chelseafc.com/matches/2015-16/11/chelsea-norwich-pl.html http://www.skysports.com/football/chelsea-vs-norwich/341307 http://int.soccerway.com/matches/2015/11/21/england/premier-league/chelsea-football-club/norwich-city-fc/2043178/ CHELSEA -VS- NORWICH CITY 1 - 0 Competition Premier League Date Saturday 21 November 2015 Game week 13 Kick-off [3:00 pm - England Time] / (04:00 am - (NZDT)[+13 Hours] Half-time 0 - 0 Full-time 1 - 0 Venue Stamford Bridge (London) Attendance 41582 Unionjack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unionjack 7,531 Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 1 hour ago, KevinAshburner said: Chelsea have not kept a clean sheet at Stamford Bridge since November 2015 (9 months). #CFC The Last Time Chelsea keep a clean sheet at Home. http://www.chelseafc.com/matches/2015-16/11/chelsea-norwich-pl.html http://www.skysports.com/football/chelsea-vs-norwich/341307 http://int.soccerway.com/matches/2015/11/21/england/premier-league/chelsea-football-club/norwich-city-fc/2043178/ CHELSEA -VS- NORWICH CITY 1 - 0 Competition Premier League Date Saturday 21 November 2015 Game week 13 Kick-off [3:00 pm - England Time] / (04:00 am - (NZDT)[+13 Hours] Half-time 0 - 0 Full-time 1 - 0 Venue Stamford Bridge (London) Attendance 41582 One hellova record to be proud about! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwi1691 255 Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Article on the redevelopment http://www.eurosport.co.uk/football/premier-league/2015-2016/chelsea-stadium-latest_sto5723811/story.shtml Objections now posted on the RBKC website too, dated 1st August (just search for 'Stamford Bridge' and look under the Decisions tab) https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/planning/searches/default.aspx Quote The information submitted with the application fails to demonstrate that the development would not have an unacceptable impact upon the operation of Earl's Court underground station. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to policy CT1(j) of this Borough's Consolidated Local Plan and policies 6.1(j) and 6.3 of The London Plan 2015 In the absence of a suitable S106 obligation to secure an appropriate payment for a review of on-street parking controls, and further payment for implementation of changes to on-street parking controls if necessary in the Royal Borough, the application does not mitigate the impact of the proposals on on-street parking pressure within the Royal Borough, contrary to policies of the Consolidated Local Plan in particular, Policy CT1 and policy 6.13 of the London Plan 2015. The information submitted with the application fails to demonstrate the demolition and construction phases of the development would not have an adverse impact on this Borough's highways . The submitted information fails to adequately consider the cumulative impact of traffic movements during these phases and the impact on the junction of Fulham Road and Finsborough Road (A3220) which is relied upon by all site traffic. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to policies contained in the Consolidated Local Plan, in particular CT1 The development fails to provide a sufficient number of cycle parking spaces which is likely to lead to an increase in informal cycle parking within the Royal Borough's streets, resulting in unwelcome street clutter, contrary to policies CT1 and CR4 of the Consolidated Local Plan and London Plan 2015 policy 6.9. The proposed development, by reason of the proximity of the raised walkway to the Stamford Cottage properties, would cause a significant increase in the sense of enclosure and have an unacceptable and harmful impact on the living conditions of occupiers of those properties. This conflicts with policies of this Borough's Consolidated Local Plan , in particular policy CL5. The proposed development would result in a significant loss of sunlight and daylight to properties in Stamford Cottages and would cause an unacceptable reduction in the living conditions of those properties. This conflicts with policies of this Borough's Consolidated Local Plan 2015, in particular policy CL5. The proposed development by reason of its development over the railway embankment and its close proximity to Brompton Cemetery, would cause a partial loss of, and harm to, this Borough's Grade 1 Sites of Nature Conservation Importance. The development does not provide appropriate mitigation for this harm and the submitted bat surveys are inadequate to fully assess the ecological impact of the development. This conflicts with policies contained in this Borough's Consolidated Local Plan 2015, in particular policies CE4 and CR5. The proposal does not include an air quality neutral assessment for transport emissions as is required by the Mayor's Sustainable Design and Construction SPG (2014). It is not possible to determine whether the development would be air quality neutral for transport emissions and if it were not neutral, the mitigation required to offset this is not determined. As such the development could undermine efforts to control the impact of development on air quality in this Borough, contrary to policy CE5 of this Borough's Consolidated Local Plan and policy 7.14 of the London Plan. The proposed development by reason of its scale and proximity to the Billings Conservation Area and Brompton Cemetery Conservation Area is considered to result in harm to the setting and views from out of these Conservation Areas. Therefore, the proposal is considered contrary to policies in the Consolidated Local Plan, in particular, Policy CL3 The Chels 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,448 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 On 8/17/2016 at 3:41 AM, KevinAshburner said: Chelsea have not kept a clean sheet at Stamford Bridge since November 2015 (9 months). #CFC The Last Time Chelsea keep a clean sheet at Home. http://www.chelseafc.com/matches/2015-16/11/chelsea-norwich-pl.html http://www.skysports.com/football/chelsea-vs-norwich/341307 http://int.soccerway.com/matches/2015/11/21/england/premier-league/chelsea-football-club/norwich-city-fc/2043178/ CHELSEA -VS- NORWICH CITY 1 - 0 Competition Premier League Date Saturday 21 November 2015 Game week 13 Kick-off [3:00 pm - England Time] / (04:00 am - (NZDT)[+13 Hours] Half-time 0 - 0 Full-time 1 - 0 Venue Stamford Bridge (London) Attendance 41582 Ridiculous...its been long overdue since we've had to reset this statistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 BXL70 and BlueStorm1003 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scargo 75 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Chelsea's plan for new stadium runs into trouble... over threat to bats' habitat http://www. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/chelseas-plan-for-new-stadium-runs-into-trouble-over-threat-to-bats-habitat-a3330141.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hostedenis 556 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 1 hour ago, scargo said: Chelsea's plan for new stadium runs into trouble... over threat to bats' habitat http://www. Can't believe they won't let Michy leave the grounds... Let the guy find an appartment ffs guddy6969 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scargo 75 Posted August 27, 2016 Share Posted August 27, 2016 Stamford Bridge redevelopment is official? or just plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.