Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

One was just joking about the opponents while the other was chanting something offensive. Not sure how you can even put those two in the same category.

Instead of using the words "joking" and "chanting" both actions can be considered mocking which at the end of the day is what happened in both instances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    10334

  • Laylabelle

    4831

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2611

Instead of using the words "joking" and "chanting" both actions can be considered mocking which at the end of the day is what happened in both instances.

You can say they both mocked but the difference was the words they used to do so. One wasn't offensive at all while the other was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also appeared to have solicited the Belgiam federation to become NT coach again now there are rumours Wilmots could be off to Schalke.

That cunt ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might put a sneaky fiver on Sunderland to finish top ten next season.

Advocaat is an expierenced manager who knows what he is doing, and some really do underestimate the difference a manager can make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premier League sponsorless after 2017

Having been sponsored by Barclays since 2004, in 2016 the competition will be known simply as 'The Premier League

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12040/9875425/premier-league-sponsorless-after-2017

Good. I hated the fact that the league was affiliated with such an evil organization...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

evil?!

Barclay's is one of the biggest banks in the world that practically control the world economy. They were complicit in the economical breakdown in 2008 and have been on several times found to be partaking in criminal organizations such as money laundry and fixing foreign currencies, but their managers and CEOs always manage to escape jail time with plea bargains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea FC is in Fulham and should have been named Fulham City or Fulham United or Fulham Road FC because Chelsea is Fulham FC Neigbour and Rivalry.

Also Aston Villa FC should have been named Birmingham United FC because Aston Villa is in Birmingham and because there is Birmingham City FC.

also Everton is in Liverpool so Everton should have been named Liverpool City FC or Liverpool United FC.

what are you're thoughts on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You