Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    10973

  • Laylabelle

    4887

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2619

Again what players would you take as a first team player?

England are on the decline, there's no World Class players there. None. We have to focus on quality not nationality.

It doesn't matter how many times people bring up the quality factor, we're an English club and should be going the extra mile to accommodate them. If I knew Ivanovic had naked pics of Jose I would have been even more adamant about signing Shaw, Luis is too old for the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how many times people bring up the quality factor, we're an English club and should be going the extra mile to accommodate them. If I knew Ivanovic had naked pics of Jose I would have been even more adamant about signing Shaw, Luis is too old for the bench.

So pay exorbitant amount of money on a player to sit on the bench just cause he's English? A la Real Madrid w/Spanish players? Doesn't seem smart to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how many times people bring up the quality factor, we're an English club and should be going the extra mile to accommodate them. If I knew Ivanovic had naked pics of Jose I would have been even more adamant about signing Shaw, Luis is too old for the bench.

Ridiculous idea, just get players because they are English despite being shit.

We might as well get Heskey in our team if that's the case and not win anything for the next decade just because we "accommodated" shit English players.. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So pay exorbitant amount of money on a player to sit on the bench just cause he's English? A la Real Madrid w/Spanish players? Doesn't seem smart to me.

He's 19 years old, the fee is fair based on his potential, it's worth the premium for English, this is Chelsea football club of England.

When you sign a 29 year old for £15m.. he HAS to play, youngsters can bide their time on the bench and wait for a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chamberlain, Gibbs, Wilshere = 3.

United on the other hand, 1.

And really he's kinda crap....though guess now he's Captain he has to play but just dont see it.Been bad for England for a long time.Then again England have been pretty bad full stop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's 19 years old, the fee is fair based on his potential, it's worth the premium for English, this is Chelsea football club of England.

When you sign a 29 year old for £15m.. he HAS to play, youngsters can bide their time on the bench and wait for a chance.

First, if he's guaranteed to be reliable player for a long time then you can possibly justify the fee. But how are you going to justify giving an 18 year old more wages than Cahill, Azpi, Ramires, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You