The Chels 2,502 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Anyone who thinks Lampard isn't motivated to deny us the league is deluded. It's much more than just playing well for his team. kellzfresh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,536 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 It's annoying but we had a gap against them that he didn't cause us to loose.We win our games it don't matter.we fuck up.then it's our fault.Level with henry regardless the feelings not a bad record. iseah100 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Term-X 7,891 Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted December 13, 2014 OMG! Get over it people! Do you guys expect Frank not to play well and score for his new club? Come on seriously we just have to accept the fact that he's not playing for Chelsea anymore. I know it sucks to see one of Chelsea's bestplayers play and score for that shitty club but we decided to let him go and he's moved on by playing for a club that actually wants him.Jose could have given Frank a squad player role like the one has at City but chose not to because understandably we're looking to give other players a chance.When you're the personification and symbol of a club like Totti for Roma, you can't behave in the same manner as the average footballer. Tomo, stroey, The Chels and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 When you're the personification and symbol of a club like Totti for Roma, you can't behave in the same manner as the average footballer.I'm still trying to figure out who determined that. It's not his fault he was a great player on a successful club. Liquidator and Fernando 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 When you're the personification and symbol of a club like Totti for Roma, you can't behave in the same manner as the average footballer.Wasn't mourinho the same for Chelsea? And when he joined inter and we had to play against them he talked thrash about us. But that's what mourinho must do because he's a professional, likewise Lampard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 lol soton down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Lol, imagine Lampard's last English trophy was with Man City. His last PL trophy with Man City. Some "legend" he is. If City wins the league, I will not stand the look of Lampard anymore. A BIG traitor to us Chelsea fans, full stop.He will be a City legend if they win the league, he single handedly got the 3 points today, took 2 VITAL points from us etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Wasn't mourinho the same for Chelsea?And when he joined inter and we had to play against them he talked thrash about us.But that's what mourinho must do because he's a professional, likewise Lampard.No, Mourinho isn't on that level. Lampard & John Terry are the two biggest icons in Chelsea history, Osgood etc were not around for the commercial era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I'm still trying to figure out who determined that. It's not his fault he was a great player on a successful club.He played the role and acted the part, never shied away from the status; he lapped it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 No, Mourinho isn't on that level. Lampard & John Terry are the two biggest icons in Chelsea history, Osgood etc were not around for the commercial era.Well that's your view, mourinho is an icon just like these two. And he was a "traitor" just like Lampard. But it's all good because he's a professional.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Wasn't mourinho the same for Chelsea?And when he joined inter and we had to play against them he talked thrash about us.But that's what mourinho must do because he's a professional, likewise Lampard.How can you compare Mourinho to Lampard? Did Mourinho go to Man United? Man City? Arsenal?Lampard is at the end of his career, he won everything in England. There was absolutely no reason to stay in the Premier League. If he cared about Chelsea in the slightest he wouldnt have joined City. Another game, another 3 points thanks to Lampard. I loved the guy but every game he scores and gets points for them....... Mana and Term-X 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 He played the role and acted the part, never shied away from the status; he lapped it up.Of course, why would he turn it down though? If anyone wins them the title it'd be Aguero, not Frank and his 4 goals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 No, Mourinho isn't on that level. Lampard & John Terry are the two biggest icons in Chelsea history, Osgood etc were not around for the commercial era.and mourinho is a manager, who managed an italian team, he dosent control who he plays in the CL.lampard is just a dickhead who joined our biggest rivals on purpose, unlike our other loyal veterans Term-X, Mana, Amblève. and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 How can you compare Mourinho to Lampard? Did Mourinho go to Man United? Man City? Arsenal?Lampard is at the end of his career, he won everything in England. There was absolutely no reason to stay in the Premier League. If he cared about Chelsea in the slightest he wouldnt have joined City. Another game, another 3 points thanks to Lampard. I loved the guy but every game he scores and gets points for them....... And when we played inter he talked thrash about us. Lampard has never done that. He's thrash talking is in the field. Mourinho is a big mouth, and Lampard is a fútbol player. But they each got to do what they have to do because they are professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobematabryant 400 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Well that's your view, mourinho is an icon just like these two.And he was a "traitor" just like Lampard.But it's all good because he's a professional....So joining Inter & Madrid, teams in a different league, makes him a traitor? Aha, that's the silliest thing I've heard all week. What Lampard is doing, he joined a DIRECT rival club to Chelsea and has constantly been scoring for them, to the point he's even scored against us. Mana, Polo7 and Term-X 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,536 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Thought city were meant to be a one man team.makes no different having agruro out they're still a threat.we had a 8 point gap.we lost that with our performances Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 So joining Inter & Madrid, teams in a different league, makes him a traitor? Aha, that's the silliest thing I've heard all week. What Lampard is doing, he joined a DIRECT rival club to Chelsea and has constantly been scoring for them, to the point he's even scored against us. Yeah but he talked thrash about us and beat us in the CL. By that logic then Lampard should not score any goals for City..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 And when we played inter he talked thrash about us.Lampard has never done that.He's thrash talking is in the field.Mourinho is a big mouth, and Lampard is a fútbol player.But they each got to do what they have to do because they are professional.Mourinho is known for playing mind games. At least Mourinho had the decency to not join another English club. Lampard will never be the same in my eyes. Our all time top scorer, this is how he repays us. Absolute bellend. Term-X 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Mourinho is known for playing mind games. At least Mourinho had the decency to not join another English club. Lampard will never be the same in my eyes. Our all time top scorer, this is how he repays us. Absolute bellend.If mourinho loved us he would have never beaten us with inter. Just like Lampard should not score goals for City.... But hey they can't do that because they are professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 If mourinho loved us he would have never beaten us with inter.Just like Lampard should not score goals for City....But hey they can't do that because they are professional.Lol theres no other explanation. You are an idiot. Im not expecting Lampard to not score goals for City, I was expecting Lampard to not CHOOSE to play for a direct rival. The Chels, kobematabryant, stroey and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.