Edinson Cavani

[calculatingInfinity 1,472]

i'm watching napoli last 2 years, and Cavani is going to be one of the best strikers in the world, if we can get him we can find a great replace for big Drogs.

As a serie a follower (and Palermo fan ) I completely agree, sadly I just really don't think he would go to Chelsea as it looks at the moment.

[Hd123 5]

As a serie a follower (and Palermo fan ) I completely agree, sadly I just really don't think he would go to Chelsea as it looks at the moment.

Of course he won't. Because we won't go for him @ 50m. If we havent learned our lesson, I will be truly disappointed.

[DDA 9,924]

Bang on. Ability being the operative word. Cavani is definitely a natural born striker, but I'd rather spend that money on a versatile striker like Pato or Hulk. A striker who can beat players. Aguero what a miss he was, what rubs salt in the wounds is how hot our pursuit was for many years. He consistently talked big of us and he somehow ended up at City. Amid Torres capture it was rumored we still pertained interest.

Aguero ended up at City probably because alot of money was being stuffed in his agents pocket! I agree with you about the striker issue i think Cavani is an excellent pkayer but he just isnt worth 50million euros i would prefer Pato who would probably be cheaper!

[Hd123 5]

Aguero ended up at City probably because alot of money was being stuffed in his agents pocket! I agree with you about the striker issue i think Cavani is an excellent pkayer but he just isnt worth 50million euros i would prefer Pato who would probably be cheaper!

Aguero went for 15m less than our pretty boy bench warmer and is 1000000x times superior to him at the moment. He is also heads above any other striker in the league bar RVP (who is 29), any agent fees or his wages would have been worth it.

[DDA 9,924]

Aguero went for 15m less than our pretty boy bench warmer and is 1000000x times superior to him at the moment. He is also heads above any other striker in the league bar RVP (who is 29), any agent fees or his wages would have been worth it.

Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players!

[TacticalBlues 2,817]

Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players!

You trolling mate? lol

On topic though I really think Pato should be priority .Like I said already Pato's ability to beat a player - like Kun or even Suarez - is an asset that would aid any team. His speed is something else too - IMO he'd easily give Ronaldo a good run. I won't be forgetting his goal against Barca any time soon (Here it is for those of you who don't know what I'm talking about)

[Hd123 5]

Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players!

Hernandez is not even close to aguero or van persie. He's just a tap in specialist with otherwise no remarkable footballing qualities. Aguero can take on his man and make a great pass, or strike a magical ball from the edge of the box. Hernandez can't, he's one dimensional and while he has great off the ball movement (great requirement for a striker) he will never be anything more than that

As for Suarez, his finishing is woeful, and again not near the top strikers in the league.

The top five are: Dzeko, RVP, Balo, Aguero and Ba

[DDA 9,924]

Whats trolling son?

[DDA 9,924]

Hernandez is not even close to aguero or van persie. He's just a tap in specialist with otherwise no remarkable footballing qualities. Aguero can take on his man and make a great pass, or strike a magical ball from the edge of the box. Hernandez can't, he's one dimensional and while he has great off the ball movement (great requirement for a striker) he will never be anything more than that

As for Suarez, his finishing is woeful, and again not near the top strikers in the league.

The top five are: Dzeko, RVP, Balo, Aguero and Ba

What? Suarez is easily on the level of Aguero! He plays in an average Loserpool team! His finishing is woeful? I really dont think so mate! His work rate, link up play and ability is nothing short of class considering he has to win games for Loserpool by himself at times!

As for Hernandez yh maybe his overall game isnt as good as RVP and Aguero but he is a striker and stirkers are meant to score goals end of which is the point i was trying to make when comparing the 3.

[Hd123 5]

What? Suarez is easily on the level of Aguero! He plays in an average Loserpool team! His finishing is woeful? I really dont think so mate! His work rate, link up play and ability is nothing short of class considering he has to win games for Loserpool by himself at times!

As for Hernandez yh maybe his overall game isnt as good as RVP and Aguero but he is a striker and stirkers are meant to score goals end of which is the point i was trying to make when comparing the 3.

The amount of great chances Suarez misses are astonishing. I agree with you on his other qualities, but he is not a clinical finisher.

As for Hernandez, like I say, very good poacher but not a top striker who could contribute far more to a team.

Think we should try Ba, reminds me a lot of pre-Chelsea Torres, but he has some knee problems IIRC? Might be risky

[TacticalBlues 2,817]

Whats trolling son?

Trolling

Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value.

= trollface

In this case, I thought that your Hernandez remark was a joke because it was so outlandish IMO.

[DDA 9,924]

Trolling

Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value.

= trollface

In this case, I thought that your Hernandez remark was a joke because it was so outlandish IMO.

Oh ok well thanks for clearing that one up mate! Ill try not troll in future posts!

For the record i hate Hernandez and his annoying head! Just think he is one of the top strikers in the Prem!