Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ulvhedin said:

If that's true then personally I don't think they will be willing to sell Lukaku

OFFICIAL: Inter Receives €275 Million Loan from Oaktree

Suning’s long-awaited lifeline

https://www.serpentsofmadonnina.com/2021/5/20/22445987/official-inter-receives-275-million-loan-from-oaktree

687dcfb49a0e4cdfb6b0fb16bf7a7905.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/05/2021 at 14:12, Jas said:

Even so, no guarantee Guardiola will go for Kane anyway.

Also, IF Messi becomes available this summer, would Guardiola go for him instead?

IF Citeh are indeed serious about becoming the best club on the planet for years on end, they will kneecap every other top 10 club on planet and nail down Håland this summer

that's the way I see it

he is basically the final major piece to that monstrous puzzle until De Bruyne ages out, which is years from now, unfortunately I fear, he still has at least 3, probably 4 top years left (30, 31, 32, and likely 33yo, as he turns 30 on June 28, 2021)

I do not for a second buy into the deluded (and playa hating) arguments that Real, Barca, Pool, Juve, Bayern, Atleti, PSG, and Manure fans are using when the say Håland cannot adapt to Pep's style.

That is just ludicrous.

Those 8 clubs, plus Chels and Citeh are the 10 biggest clubs on the planet, with Inter banging on the door (likely booting out Atletico, especially if Simeone bounces) IF they hold onto all their players and add intelligently, which I sorta doubt they can, even with that 275m euro loan, but time will tell.

Putting on my Mongol empress (the only empire in human history that actual had a shot at taking over the ENTIRE world, but that is far too long a convo and not germane to thsi discussion) cap, IF I was Citeh, I would grab Håland this summer and then somehow work out a Sterling (who surely will rebound this coming season) + cash plus maybe even another player (maybe a CB other than Dias, especially IF the rumours are true and Citeh is going for Bastoni) for Mbappe next season with PSG (make a deal where he stays for next year at PSG, lock him up for summer 2022 (when his contract expires), no matter what the cost).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

Same team, same age, same physical appearance, same position, this guy gives me Bakayoko 2.0 vibes, why can't we go for Camavinga who is in the last year on his contract smh.

Edited by R2D2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, R2D2 said:

Same team, same age, same physical appearance, same position, this guy gives me Bakayoko 2.0 vibes, why can't we go for Camavinga who is in the last year on his contract smh.

Many of the CFC fan base are comparing him to Bakayoko mainly being his position and club he plays for and I can't say I've seen him play much but from the clips I've watched of him he looks a far more technical player on the ball that that fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, R2D2 said:

Same team, same age, same physical appearance, same position, this guy gives me Bakayoko 2.0 vibes, why can't we go for Camavinga who is in the last year on his contract smh.

Nah. He’s the real deal. 
 

Pure DM with not a lot of weaknesses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linked with this clown again, praying it's bollocks, this guy is the Lukaku of midfielders overrated beyond belief, hope United waste the money on him.

Rather take the risk with Tchouameni than this overrated and overpriced British player.

Edited by R2D2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, R2D2 said:

Linked with this clown again, praying it's bollocks, this guy is the Lukaku of midfielders overrated beyond belief, hope United waste the money on him.

Rather take the risk with Tchouameni than this overrated and overpriced British player.

Just waste of money, there are other players who would cost far less than Rice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blues Forever said:

Just waste of money, there are other players who would cost far less than Rice.

Its Matt Law.

The Athletic stated our board were furious with Lampard when he suggested to break the bank for him. I like Rice but we should be all over Tchouameni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or do some people's dislike of Rice here seems to be more about his nationality rather than his actual ability etc?

Call me paranoid but I refuse to believe stories that say Tuchel wants Player A, B, C until we know for sure he's staying, *ahem* regardless of what happens in these last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Its Matt Law.

The Athletic stated our board were furious with Lampard when he suggested to break the bank for him. I like Rice but we should be all over Tchouameni

The difference between then and now is we could use Abraham to lower the price in a player + cash for player deal. West Ham also need a striker since Antonio is a tad injury prone.

There's two advantages to this if we make it happen - (a) we let go of an unwanted player and (b) Rice already knows the league and has less question marks over him than Tchouameni (based on some responses here). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jas said:

Is it just me or do some people's dislike of Rice here seems to be more about his nationality rather than his actual ability etc?

Call me paranoid but I refuse to believe stories that say Tuchel wants Player A, B, C until we know for sure he's staying, *ahem* regardless of what happens in these last two games.

The dislike is more about the price tag, £90m is insane money for a DM and not even a world class.

Edited by Blues Forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

The dislike is more about the price tag, £90m is insane money for a DM and not even a world class.

Let's not try to cover it up here. You have people calling Rice a clown, overrated, overpriced or whatever else. No one seems to be talking about his actual ability. And if we can use Abraham to lower the fee to about 40-50 million, then not sure why are we complaining. Someone like Tchouameni - who has supposedly been compared to Bakayoko! - may be cheaper but he's still untested in this league and no guarantee he'll be a success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jas said:

Let's not try to cover it up here. You have people calling Rice a clown, overrated, overpriced or whatever else. No one seems to be talking about his actual ability. And if we can use Abraham to lower the fee to about 40-50 million, then not sure why are we complaining. Someone like Tchouameni - who has supposedly been compared to Bakayoko! - may be cheaper but he's still untested in this league and no guarantee he'll be a success

This also applied to Rice, being a PL proven doesn't guarantee him success at Chelsea.  Even using Abraham + £40m - £50m is still too much for someone who isn't a world class in his position, just not smart way to spend money in this current Covid.

Edited by Blues Forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already rated Declan Rice highly last summer and this season he's been even better by a big margin. If a transfer is doable with Tammy + money I'd say go for it. Great player and destined to be a great team leader, which is always a nice bonus and a really underrated quality when comparing different transfer targets. 

To some of the people 'hating' on Rice and crying for a non-British alternative at a cheaper price, didn't you already get burnt with the fraud that turned out to be Sergio Reguilon, the 'best left-back in La Liga'? After watching both of them in the PL this season how many Chelsea fans would trade Chilwell for him now? Chilwell might not be the perfect player himself either but Reguilon has been a joke.

Sure for the midfield position there could be a quality alternative out there with good enough scouting but the best ones still cost a lot of money. Obviously talk of £90M or something like that for Rice is beyond ridiculous but I'd be really surprised if the actual transfer value was anything above £65-70M and if West Ham were to take Tammy in exchange that already covers half and would solve two issues at once because in this covid market there might not be many takers for Tammy at a fair enough value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

This also applied to Rice, being a PL proven doesn't guarantee him success at Chelsea.  Even using Abraham + £40m - £50m is still too much for someone who isn't a world class in his position, just not smart way to spend money in this current Covid.

No one is saying Rice being PL proven will guarantee him to be a success but compare him with someone who is still untested in this league, there's more chance of Rice being a success. Neither pro or anti Tchouameni/Rice here but if spending extra 10-20 million guarantee us more of a sure thing, I'd rather choose the more expensive option. 

COVID-19 pandemic or not, what's 40-50 million these days? It's like the old big 30 million transfers before the market became as wild as it is today. If/when we sell the deadwoods, the money coming in can easily cover the 40-50 million or at least part of it. 

It's also funny you mentioned about spending smartly when last summer, we spent over 200 million on new players, including 70 million+ on Havertz, who has the potential but isn't world class right now and this summer, we're talking about potentially spending over 100 million on a new striker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jas said:

No one is saying Rice being PL proven will guarantee him to be a success but compare him with someone who is still untested in this league, there's more chance of Rice being a success. Neither pro or anti Tchouameni/Rice here but if spending extra 10-20 million guarantee us more of a sure thing, I'd rather choose the more expensive option. 

COVID-19 pandemic or not, what's 40-50 million these days? It's like the old big 30 million transfers before the market became as wild as it is today. If/when we sell the deadwoods, the money coming in can easily cover the 40-50 million or at least part of it. 

It's also funny you mentioned about spending smartly when last summer, we spent over 200 million on new players, including 70 million+ on Havertz, who has the potential but isn't world class right now and this summer, we're talking about potentially spending over 100 million on a new striker. 

Paying big money for an attacker are more justified than for a DM. I won't have any problem if we spend over £100m for a world class player and for a position we need the most. Rice as good as he is not worth to spend £90m, the likes of Tchouameni or Kamara are far more reasonable given they are far cheaper and it's not like the gap between them and Rice are big. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

Paying big money for an attacker are more justified than for a DM. I won't have any problem if we spend over £100m for a world class player and for a position we need the most. Rice as good as he is not worth to spend £90m, the likes of Tchouameni or Kamara are far more reasonable given they are far cheaper and it's not like the gap between them and Rice are big. 

Though they aint PL proven but to me they have gotten far superior qualities than Rice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You