Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, DDA said:

Do not pay more than 80m for Caicedo.. it's time to stop this madness and tell these stupid cunts to fuck off.

Unless Barella is possible I’m not sure how many other options are out there that are at his level. Maybe Amrabat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Artandur said:

Sweetener for the Lavia offer? After all, this report says we are offering the value of our buyback clause, if I'm remembering the figure correctly, but there were links last week about Tino moving for less than half that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, milka said:

With this pleiad of young inexperienced  players from Brazil, France or elsewhere  towards which we have oriented , we won't win anything soon. At most, we will  become a nice  team that doesn't win anything like Spursy 2015-19.We sent almost all the experienced players from the team like Kante  Kovacic ,Azpi and only Thiago Silva remained, who may even be a reserve in view of his age.If we take an experienced name, it will not be that bad .Lack of leadership at the moment .

 

Can't you find something negative to say🥵

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Blue Armour said:

That overpriced Declan Rice transfer has screwed up our move for Caicedo a bit.

Liverpool get MacAllister for peanuts but Brighton are charging an arm and a leg for Caicedo

Macallister was a release clause though, bit different to Caicedo 

Caicedo is arguably their most valuable asset and they already rejected around the 65-70 million mark in January from Arsenal, he also signed a new deal with them (on the condition that he'd be allowed to leave this summer).  Think it'll be closer to 90 million including add-ons and they know our alternative option ran to PSG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Sweetener for the Lavia offer? After all, this report says we are offering the value of our buyback clause, if I'm remembering the figure correctly, but there were links last week about Tino moving for less than half that.

Yea Newcastle were keen at 15 million but then Southampton would have to pay us around 20% or more of that fee as a sell-on.

They'd be better off negotiating straight with us, get a slightly higher fee in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Macallister was a release clause though, bit different to Caicedo 

Caicedo is arguably their most valuable asset and they already rejected around the 65-70 million mark in January from Arsenal, he also signed a new deal with them (on the condition that he'd be allowed to leave this summer).  Think it'll be closer to 90 million including add-ons and they know our alternative option ran to PSG. 

Initially it was reported we wanted caicedo and ugarte , I think lavia is our ugarte alternative as a pure DM 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess our owners are about to exploit another loophole with all these youngsters. Probably something to do with the multi-club project. Let’s wait and see.

About the point that we can’t win anything with a young squad I believe is rubbish. The thing missing is consistency, but some of these lads have ok experience and are about to build on it. As Poch said we need to be a team, a family first. If everyone is pulling in the same direction results will come faster than you think. KTBFFH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You