Chelsea Transfers

[Vesper 29,135]

18 minutes ago, Jas said:

Guessing this will be the decisive bid.....

 

£400K per week

around £220m spend (t-fee + 5 years salary) not counting add-ons or agent fees

[Marvin123 486]

5 years of 25+ prem goals a season for me. I'm so happy.....

[Vesper 29,135]

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

My goodness that’s a fuck load of money. 

£400K per week

around £220m spend (t-fee + 5 years salary) not counting add-ons or agent fees

[milka 3,359]

he always wanted to be Drogba for Chelsea  now he get 2nd chance 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2021 by milka

[Special Juan 27,492]

It's happening.

[calculatingInfinity 1,462]

Not a fan of spending this much on Lukaku. But it's hard to see alternatives I guess, if Håland isnt an option.

[hiterto 35]

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

[Special Juan 27,492]

4 minutes ago, hiterto said:

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

Never read so much shite in my life....go to bed 

[milka 3,359]

7 minutes ago, hiterto said:

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

Lukaku struggling  before  and was too young   we had Drogba, Torres , Sturridge Anelka , Kalou -   imagine if he flop again and  - 130m for player we sold before and he flop again after  his return 

 

Edited August 3, 2021 by milka

[King Kante 1,519]

1 hour ago, Magic Lamps said:

It is quite ridiculous signing Kounde and Lukaku

We are about to sign

a centre back who is all flashy skills, dribbling and technique but tiny and weak

and a centre forward who is all height, strength and power but no skill, dribbling nor technique

and each is gonna cost a ton...

you could not make this up.

You can if you see 2015 to now as a whole instead of isolating 2017 and shifting it to Conte. Barring last season the club have been pulling this nonsense for six years now. 

Edited August 3, 2021 by King Kante

[King Kante 1,519]

16 minutes ago, calculatingInfinity said:

Not a fan of spending this much on Lukaku. But it's hard to see alternatives I guess, if Håland isnt an option.

Honestly, I'd would have preferred to have kept Giroud or even give Tammy another year. 

[NikkiCFC 8,065]

1 hour ago, Pizy said:

Watching Lukaku’s goal compilation from this last season and you can’t help but be impressed. 

Impressed by what? Penalties and sitters? Not one single impressive goal.

He is more clinical, I give him that. We spoke many times how Werner and Havertz have 25% conversation rate of big chances.

Lukaku last season in Seria A and CL: 28 goals from 49 big chances so this is 57%.

I honestly expect Lewandowski to be better player in 37 than Lukaku in 32 so we should have spend 120m on him.

[acidic 0]

1 hour ago, Simon1991 said:

And honestly, the negativity around here is getting tiring, the fan base will never be happy about anything it seems.

We are rumoured to sign one of the hottest CB prospects, he's weak, and a "dwarf" to some.

We are rumoured to sign a striker in his prime which destroyed the Serie A last year and the year before, and we are apparently signing a Torres bis.

Please let the board do their job and trust it is the best decision they can possibly make. We fans can never have the full picture, so we have no other choice than trust the process. And it's not like we're Spurs or Arsenal for fuck's sake, our board has shown us times and times that they are competent.

 

i wont be surprised if the manchester clubs or liverpool fans were negative about such a possible signing..

but i understand we are only fans..let the owners splash money on whoever they want...

[Special Juan 27,492]

2 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Impressed by what? Penalties and sitters? Not one single impressive goal.

He is more clinical, I give him that. We spoke many times how Werner and Havertz have 25% conversation rate of big chances.

Lukaku last season in Seria A and CL: 28 goals from 49 big chances so this is 57%.

I honestly expect Lewandowski to be better player in 37 than Lukaku in 32 so we should have spend 120m on him.

Another one bookmarked....Do you play with yourself and worry about how the woman feels?

Wake up.

[LAM09 6,822]

At the point where I'm starting to think there's more to the Haaland "saga" and, he's set on moving elsewhere. That's the only conceivable reasoning for us going full steam ahead for Lukaku all of a sudden.

[Blue Armour 4,325]

26 minutes ago, milka said:

he always wanted to be Drogba for Chelsea  now he get 2nd chance 

 

 

He plays nothing like Drogba., but whatever.

[Special Juan 27,492]

6 minutes ago, King Kante said:

Honestly, I'd would have preferred to have kept Giroud or even give Tammy another year. 

Ladies and gents the Del Boy of Talk Chelsea....thank fuck you aren't in charge

[milka 3,359]

Some different opinion