Jump to content

Sarri But Not Sarri Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, whats happening said:

+1

find it funny this moaning for conte, when this time last year all you can read the same shit just replace sarri with contes name.

We could have been relegated this season and it still wouldn't exonerate Conte for that shitshow 6 months (FA Cup run aside).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Fernando said:

I do, for the same reason I wanted to keep Conte. 

We need to get rid of many players and build on the managers identity. 

It was much easier with Conte because we are build for that, with Sarri much harder and expected to be like this. Even hard results to take it was something expected as well on my part. 

Thats what one of the problems is,

Ive said it before. Its because the previous 2 managers (and the board) brought in players that suited their defensive ways of playing.

The players we have no are all a missmatch of not 1 particular way of playing.

They were told so often to defend at all cost that their natural instincts to go forward has been played out of them.

Thats how I see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

At the time we were linked with Sarri, while Conte was still here the majority didnt gave a shit about lack of rotation, no trophies and a stubbornness with playing style. That is the reality. Everyone sat with hards on over how Pep and Klopps teams played and wanted us to change and be more attacking. It is really quite strange that people expected this change to happen overnight, with only 3 players signing (Kepa, Jorginho and Higuain). Yes Sarri isnt on those managers level either but his Napoli probably would of beaten us quite easily. Theres no doubt this particular squad has limitations, it always has, even when we won leagues under Jose and Conte. Both who were hugely criticized for their playing style by many on here. I honestly think we must be the most ungrateful fan base in the world 😂

Upto last month i would have agreed, i actually felt we were progressing the style quietly well, but the recent capilualations are inexhaustible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Upto last month i would have agreed, i actually felt we were progressing the style quietly well, but the recent capilualations are inexhaustible.

True but a defensive line whos left side is that weak and always a target plus a forward line thats probably not got as rigorous defensive instructions, what do you expect? We are always going to be exposed because teams are always going to hit us on the counter attack now.  Theyre doing what we did to teams years ago. The style change is obvious to see still, we play out, dominate the ball the majority of the time but teams like that are probably easier to play against than teams in a low block with 10 behind the ball. Unless youve got a front 3 like Barcas, Citys, Liverpools where they 9 times out of 10 produce. For instance, if we hired Simeone tomorrow and went to play like Atletico there would be uproar. Or played like Bayern did vs Liverpool. Although it works clear as day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Upto last month i would have agreed, i actually felt we were progressing the style quietly well, but the recent capilualations are inexhaustible.

Interesting how it nearly always falls apart around Christmas. It's as if it comes to as a surprise to the foreign coaches that there's no winter break in England

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

Again he is not a DM, hes never played a fixed position, he never has. He was a box to box player really. So playing him in Jorginhos position isnt going to do anything different really. How many tackles has Kante made in the middle and final third this season? Hes maybe not made as many as he did under Conte but again we have more of the ball, compared to the last 2 seasons. I dont see Kante being wasted so to speak, hes not gonna be hugely creative but his final pass and involvement in the build up has improved. Hes not Xavi but nobody expects him to be. Barkley and Kovacics position is the issue for our midfield.

Also Sarri forcing players to positions they srent used to? Are you serious? Which manager hasnt done that at least once in the last 10+ years? Anelka played as a right winger depsite being a striker, Ballack played as a DM despite being a CM, Essien played as a RB despite being a CM... Di Matteo played Ramires at RW, Bertrand as a LW, Eden as a false 9... Jose played Azpi as a LB, RLC as a DM, Mata as a right winger, Eden as a false 9.... Conte played Moses as a wingback, Hazard as a false 9, RLC as a striker... You would think Sarri was the only manager in football history to have done it reading this forum and some of it is quite embarrassing. Some have worked better than others but Kante has hardly played poorly in that position over the course of the season either. Jorginho is getting a lot of flack but like Mikel years ago his job isnt to score and assist goals... Sure Jorgi can play better but he can probably play a lot worse I am sure of it. The final third and left side of the defense is the biggest issues in our team.

I didnt even want Kante to play holding DM, because like you said he isnt one. Saying Jorginho shouldnt be DM or Kante shouldnt be b2b doesnt equal wanting Kante as holding DM mate.

What should be done is Kante Jorginho pivot. Sarri says he wont play double pivot because Jorginho isnt suited for that though, but at same time he plays Kante in role he feels isnt suited for either. Double standards.

I dont mind the lack of results under Sarri tbh. It was always hard for us change style and it will take two seasons at least. 

But the way we lost, by such margin to City or Bournemouth. And the fact he doesnt use youth. He doesnt change anything. Anything. Thats what pisses me off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

I didnt even want Kante to play holding DM, because like you said he isnt one. Saying Jorginho shouldnt be DM or Kante shouldnt be b2b doesnt equal wanting Kante as holding DM mate.

What should be done is Kante Jorginho pivot. Sarri says he wont play double pivot because Jorginho isnt suited for that though, but at same time he plays Kante in role he feels isnt suited for either. Double standards.

I dont mind the lack of results under Sarri tbh. It was always hard for us change style and it will take two seasons at least. 

But the way we lost, by such margin to City or Bournemouth. And the fact he doesnt use youth. He doesnt change anything. Anything. Thats what pisses me off.

I think we can all agree on that Kante-Jorginho pivot thing – it's something that should be tried. And you're wrong about Jorginho not being suited to that role, he played next to Allan in a double pivot at Napoli when they were playing 4-2-3-1. Why isn't Sarri at least trying this here is a mystery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

At the time we were linked with Sarri, while Conte was still here the majority didnt gave a shit about lack of rotation, no trophies and a stubbornness with playing style. That is the reality. Everyone sat with hards on over how Pep and Klopps teams played and wanted us to change and be more attacking. It is really quite strange that people expected this change to happen overnight, with only 3 players signing (Kepa, Jorginho and Higuain). Yes Sarri isnt on those managers level either but his Napoli probably would of beaten us quite easily. Theres no doubt this particular squad has limitations, it always has, even when we won leagues under Jose and Conte. Both who were hugely criticized for their playing style by many on here. I honestly think we must be the most ungrateful fan base in the world 😂

Nah, many knew it will take time. And we still do. Its not the results. Just because some want Sarri out, you cant say we are impatient. 

I dont mind shit results mate. I dont care if we go trophyless this season. It will take next season too to fully adopt. Its something most fans prepared for. 

BUT you have bad results and you have absolutely shite results. Worse in our PL history. And then the reaction to that. No change. ZERO. Then we go on more defeats and still, again no change after. Starting 11, subs, tactics, formations,...everything stays the same, while we continue to play shit.

Nail in the coffin is playing no youth. If people want to compare Sarri with Klopp or Pep, then check how much they play young players. 

Results are one thing, but there is a million other things wrong with Sarri that justify the sacking.

Regarding Conte, I personaly wasnt anti Conte, but when squad isnt behind you, you have to go. Doesnt matter if we want him to stay or not, the situation was that he simply had to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, !Hazard! said:

I think we can all agree on that Kante-Jorginho pivot thing – it's something that should be tried. And you're wrong about Jorginho not being suited to that role, he played next to Allan in a double pivot at Napoli when they were playing 4-2-3-1. Why isn't Sarri at least trying this here is a mystery

Im not wrong I dont know Jorginho personaly mate. But Sarri said so and thats why he doesnt play us in such formation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mana said:

Oh dear...Sky Sports has done it again.

They did not level the playing field here with the games total. Shameful, and this should be ignored.

Pep 41 trophies for club and country as player and manager

Sarri ZERO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zekinjo said:

0188A4AB-A9A4-42CC-923D-5B61E10F98A0.thumb.jpeg.28f1fd2d91ab0938c2d2cef9c1ea4603.jpeg

1. Did Guardiola lose 4-0 and 6-0 in the space of 3 games?

2. A win is a win but to put it into context. 6 of Sarri's 27 wins came against poor Europa League oppositions.

3. Comparing 56 games to 42 games is absolutely stupid. Playing another 14 games and I'm sure Sarri would win less than 7 games!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole hiring of Mourinho cost us dearly for many reasons 

Because before him we was starting to progress with Benitez into a more attack minded team. 

We got rid of of him because of the fans and appointed the fans choice...

That changed the whole vision of where the club wanted to go and we got stuck in a mess ever since. 

We are in a cross road again here and if we do the fans choice it will cost us again. 

We want to go attacking minded, then this time keep at it. Even if we sack Sarri go for manager that would go with the vision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You