Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Chelsea banned for TWO transfer windows


 Share
Followers 1

Recommended Posts

Chelsea accused in Fifa inquiry of breaking rules on signings of 25 minors

Investigation relates to signing of foreign players aged under 18 

*Chelsea face possible transfer ban from Fifa disciplinary committee 
*Club say they comply with Fifa regulations when recruiting players

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/jan/18/chelsea-accused-fifa-breaking-rules-signings-25-minors?share=facebook

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 757
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Perhaps FIFA should be looking into the modern day slavery and multiple deaths of builders working on the Qatar World Cup stadia

Funny thing is, we are getting banned for signing kids we never play

Posted Images

40 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

I've been on this forum long enough to remember when people thought he and Mceacheran were the future lol.

That's it after the all the trouble that could be been from it he went elsewhere anyway.. Never dealt happened. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Thought this was a story about Graham Rix

We was just trying to keep the urchins off the street. Who knows what they woulda turned into if we hadn't of been there.

They could have ended up at a north London club!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
43 minutes ago, the wes said:

I hope it's gonna be a fine. Banning for 4 windows straight will ruin us completely, say bye bye to Hazard and co. with no replacements. It would force us to play youth, but doing that forcefully in such a way won't bring anything good imo. It will be very hard to recover from that to even our current level.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎18‎/‎01‎/‎2018 at 10:10 PM, Hamilton said:

Knowing this could happen, isn’t about time our board takes some action and do some deals now it’s still allowd..

Are they saving money for the stadium rebuild?

The board have confidently denied any wrong doing. Let's see how it shakes out but just because there's an accusation and an investigation, does not mean there's guilt. I'm not getting agitated about this.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

The board have confidently denied any wrong doing. Let's see how it shakes out but just because there's an accusation and an investigation, does not mean there's guilt. I'm not getting agitated about this.

You just know we will get the damn ban. Meanwhile City and Psg will walk scott free.

But why the hell would we risk 1+ year ban over some 16 year old nobodies? Is our board realy so retarded? What are the odds that 16yo will develop in big star and replace all possible signings we might make during ban? Nevermind a 16yo in Chelsea of all teams? We are so awful in development, yet some smart fuck in the board think its cool to buy these players (first Kakuta, then Traore) and put everything else to risk? And not only we do it once, but twice? 

Yes we might not be proven guilty in the end, but there is no smoke without fire and whole thing just stinks.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

You just know we will get the damn ban. Meanwhile City and Psg will walk scott free.

But why the hell would we risk 1+ year ban over some 16 year old nobodies? Is our board realy so retarded? What are the odds that 16yo will develop in big star and replace all possible signings we might make during ban? Nevermind a 16yo in Chelsea of all teams? We are so awful in development, yet some smart fuck in the board think its cool to buy these players (first Kakuta, then Traore) and put everything else to risk? And not only we do it once, but twice? 

Yes we might not be proven guilty in the end, but there is no smoke without fire and whole thing just stinks.

Yeah the cost/benefit assessment seems completely off here. Heh it would have been off even with the perception of wrongdoing, since the benefits are question at best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...