Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3509213/title/fa-statement-on-mourinho

The Football Association has this afternoon (Thursday) issued a statement regarding Jose Mourinho and the weekend game against Cardiff City.

The statement reads:

'Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho has been fined £8,000 after he admitted a breach of FA Rule E3 in that his behaviour in or around the 69th minute of his side's game against Cardiff City on 19 October 2013 amounted to improper conduct.

'The fine is the standard penalty for the offence.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only you knew ...

haha he actually told you that as well? So ironic when you're older than his supposed age. I fear that the world I enter into has people like him.

Anyway pre-ordered The Special One: The Dark Side of Jose Mourinho on iBooks. Can't wait to see how crap is made up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fascinating thing so far this season is the back up plan. the team is completely re-shuffled if things aren't working. 3-5-2 or 3-6-1 or whatever you call it has worked well for the last 2 games now. Opposition is getting flooded in midfield and the defence has yet to concede a goal with 3 at the back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fascinating thing so far this season is the back up plan. the team is completely re-shuffled if things aren't working. 3-5-2 or 3-6-1 or whatever you call it has worked well for the last 2 games now. Opposition is getting flooded in midfield and the defence has yet to concede a goal with 3 at the back

I don't really think the change to a back 3 has worked the way it is supposed to, apart from getting the goals and winning the goal. There is definitely still a lack of cohesion when that happens. When the change was made against Norwich, we didn't really put them under any sustain pressure or created many chances. We left ourselves wide open at the back, which is understandable given the risk taken, and only scored the 2 goals from counter attacks - 1 with the help of defender and goalkeeper, the other a moment of individual brilliance.

Then against Cardiff, we already lost some control of the game before the change was made. And even after that, we still really couldn't control the game and were letting ourselves exposed whenever Cardiff attacked. The 2nd goal for us only came a corner clearance from Cardiff went straight back to us and after Eto'o scored, we switched back to a back 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fascinating thing so far this season is the back up plan. the team is completely re-shuffled if things aren't working. 3-5-2 or 3-6-1 or whatever you call it has worked well for the last 2 games now. Opposition is getting flooded in midfield and the defence has yet to concede a goal with 3 at the back

All thanks to Ivanovic. Same reason Ivan get the nod in most games and is gonna be the case for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really think the change to a back 3 has worked the way it is supposed to, apart from getting the goals and winning the goal. There is definitely still a lack of cohesion when that happens. When the change was made against Norwich, we didn't really put them under any sustain pressure or created many chances. We left ourselves wide open at the back, which is understandable given the risk taken, and only scored the 2 goals from counter attacks - 1 with the help of defender and goalkeeper, the other a moment of individual brilliance.

Then against Cardiff, we already lost some control of the game before the change was made. And even after that, we still really couldn't control the game and were letting ourselves exposed whenever Cardiff attacked. The 2nd goal for us only came a corner clearance from Cardiff went straight back to us and after Eto'o scored, we switched back to a back 4.

Against Norwich, it did help turn the tide a bit. Norwich were all over us at the start of the second half.

It was also used against Everton. We were doing well before the switch then and not so well after the switch was made in that game. Still did not lose control of the game at any point with the 3 at the back

Atleast there is a real backup plan now rather than just minor tweaks to the system. Under the last few managers, I don't remember a major change in the way we played to chase results

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really think the change to a back 3 has worked the way it is supposed to, apart from getting the goals and winning the goal.

I think that's exactly what is supposed to do. It might be risky, but it creates chaos in the game when a structured approach hasn't proved fruitful. I actually like the adventure it requires to take that type of risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Against Norwich, it did help turn the tide a bit. Norwich were all over us at the start of the second half. It was also used against Everton. We were doing well before the switch and not so well after the switch was made in that game.

I think that was partly, if not more, owed to the fact Norwich was quite happy to just sit back and play on the break after they got their equalizer and could have scored themselves really.

Atleast there is a real backup plan now rather than just minor tweaks to the system. Under the last few managers, I don't remember a major change in the way we played to chase results

That I don't disagree at all.

I think that's exactly what is supposed to do. It might be risky, but it creates chaos in the game when a structured approach hasn't proved fruitful. I actually like the adventure it requires to take that type of risk.

I do admit it's kinda fun when watching such risks being taken (:lol:) as it's refreshing but like I said though, the back 3 system - may not have to be a really structured setup - has yet to work in a cohesive manner for us. It's still a bit of a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3-5-2 is a trap to make the opposition come out of their shells and defensive shape to make us have more space to score.

If they still decide to sit back and not fall for the bait of our defence open, we basically flood the opponents box with more players than they are expected to mark with this formation and their defence still cracks eventually.

Its a high risk, high reward plan that works more times than it fails

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3-5-2 is a trap to make the opposition come out of their shells and defensive shape to make us have more space to score.

If they still decide to sit back and not fall for the bait of our defence open, we basically flood the opponents box with more players than they are expected to mark with this formation and their defence still cracks eventually.

Its a high risk, high reward plan that works more times than it fails

tumblr_lwg6cwaMzA1qzjix8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You