Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

the Willian signing for 30 million and loaning Moses to liverpool seems crazier the more you think about it

whoever was responsible for that should've been sacked on the spot

I would just add to it. The decision to loan Lukaku & Moses that Jose has done is totally clueless. Then, he claimed Torres, Ba & Eto´o he is happy with. It borders on madness, in my view. Now, even Mata´s place is in limbo. The Special One to the Happy One with eggs to hatch might end up with the Hopeful One to the Desperate One by December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team back then where more counter attacking, we would play in our own half a lot, however we could also cause damage primarily to the likes of Drogba who could cause all sorts of problems for the defence just on his own and a big ball coming his way.

We where a brilliant team though, I never used to watch anywhere near as much games then as I do now, never had any of that streaming stuff I just watched Match of the day or go to an actual game once a season as my home town where in the Premier League then. We used to score some great goals, players like Lampard where the key. Now it seem the board want us to go towards a different role, where we can actually play a good game of football rather than playing more direct.

But for the main point I can never remember us winning a title or even finishing 2nd without having a bad patch, besides Mourinho's first season I just can't remember it, we have always had a rough patch of games where it looks all shit. As fans we need to be a bit more optimistic, we are not the team we where two seasons ago, we now have good players a highly respected coach, we shouldn't be looking down at the floor after 2 defeats.

Just this two points says everything that I'm worried about.

Mourinho is mostly known for this type of game. The players we got and the philosophy that the board wants does not seems to equate with Mourinho.

Unless Mourinho becomes the next Klopp in producing a sexy style of futbol, Mourinho does not have a good record for this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A crisis?Bit extreme....

Bleh shame its working out for Man U with Moyles at the moment..sort of...

Sod it we played shit at least he's accepting the blame for it!Daft to think he was gana come in snap his fingers and everything be amazing and we're this super duper team because we weren't last year and aren't at the moment!However its early days as said...hopefully better to come.Takes time etc..and we need a sodding decent striker!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair. what is the chicken and what the egg.

Is Mata not being played because he is out of form or is he out of form due to not being played. I feel a lot of Mata critiques tend to forget the fact that even the best can be woeful out of form when treated in conditions as he is now. Confederations cup rested, not playing coming in unfit in a team still having no clue where to go. I do think it is genuinely too easy to ostracize Mata and put the cause in his shoes. Don't even bring confidence into this matter. Let's see what a shattering of it has done to other greatnesses in the past. Examples galore, really.

I refuse to do that because he was also pivotal in a team that won the CL and EL. Even then he got awarded. I do agree he is not a true Messi/Ronaldo star but he has every qualifications of being a very, very good player that merits more than he had coming now.

I will ask again: what is the causal chain: is Mata being subbed because he is bad or is he bad because he is being subbed (and/or not played earlier). The way it seems to me now, the whole Mata argument is a self fullfilling prophecy. We think he is bad, we don't play him; Ow you see he lacks rhythm and fitness: I told you he is bad, Didn't I!?

Please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I was referring to.

Mourinho is not good for an attacking team. He wants a counter attacking team, but the owner does not want that.

This looks like it's going to be another long drama!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I was referring to.

Mourinho is not good for an attacking team. He wants a counter attacking team, but the owner does not want that.

This looks like it's going to be another long drama!

I dont know about abrahimovic but i absolutely dread possession football. I dont like it at all, too slow and boring *coughs* *spain*. I prefer counter attack system and quick runners and fast football.

Madrid 2011/2012 and dortmund are perfect.

If we play like this, im sure most of our fans will absolutely love it without complain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair. what is the chicken and what the egg.

Is Mata not being played because he is out of form or is he out of form due to not being played. I feel a lot of Mata critiques tend to forget the fact that even the best can be woeful out of form when treated in conditions as he is now. Confederations cup rested, not playing coming in unfit in a team still having no clue where to go. I do think it is genuinely too easy to ostracize Mata and put the cause in his shoes. Don't even bring confidence into this matter. Let's see what a shattering of it has done to other greatnesses in the past. Examples galore, really.

I refuse to do that because he was also pivotal in a team that won the CL and EL. Even then he got awarded. I do agree he is not a true Messi/Ronaldo star but he has every qualifications of being a very, very good player that merits more than he had coming now.

I will ask again: what is the causal chain: is Mata being subbed because he is bad or is he bad because he is being subbed (and/or not played earlier). The way it seems to me now, the whole Mata argument is a self fullfilling prophecy. We think he is bad, we don't play him; Ow you see he lacks rhythm and fitness: I told you he is bad, Didn't I!?

Please.

:clap:

Thank you Stingray.

I'm pretty sure it's obvious some posters are blatantly biased towards Oscar in this matter, but that is neither here nor there.

I'm no expert, but I'm sure there's a difference between 'fitness' and 'match fitness'. If someone is fully fit it doesn't mean they are necessarily 100%. They also have to be psychologically ready/healthy. They can be as fit as they like but if they're head isn't in the game, if they're not mentally sharp, not acute to their new surroundings/teammates or if they simply have no confidence; they're going to be affected. Because of that, they can look like headless chickens and therefore labelled as simply 'unfit'. Mentally perhaps, yes.

Don't get me wrong, if Mata is still physically unfit then sure it's going to affect his play, no doubt. Therefore Oscar should be played more. But I think it's also fair to say that Mata isn't going to get any 'match fitness' by sitting on the bench now is he?

To use a more recent example: Rooney.

I have to say, as much as I was against having him here, he looks as if he's coming into a fine bit of form. However, he did look average in his first few matches. Even against us; he ran around quite a bit for someone who may have been labelled as 'unfit' but he never really did anything against of note. He wasn't quite 'match fit' at the time (Perhaps because his head was turned ever so slightly?). He looks match fit now though and I'm pretty sure he didn't pick up his form from sitting on the bench...

I'll stop now before I start confusing myself! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You