Raheem Sterling

[mikeholiday 209]

Hope he submits a transfer request and we get him for 30mil. Bitch slap on Livpool and City's faces. two birds...

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Manchester City are prepared to bid £50 million for Liverpool’s Raheem Sterling, sources tell ESPN FC. #MCFC #LFC

[Polo7 3,496]

Manchester City are prepared to bid £50 million for Liverpool’s Raheem Sterling, sources tell ESPN FC. #MCFC #LFC

Lol what the fuck??? £50m??? Hazard cost less, Sanchez cost less.......absolutely mental.

[Magic Lamps 11,653]

Lol what the fuck??? £50m??? Hazard cost less, Sanchez cost less.......absolutely mental.

and they also had less contract. 50m pound fucking sterling on a 20 year old. that is 69,5m €. more expensive than Zidane, Kaka, Torres. I would not want us to pay that much for a player again, we can't be 100% sure he will become world class. When Hazard joined us for like 40m € he was a few months older than sterling is now, it was expensive, but everyone could see he was worth it, he had already been a major player at lille for months, scoring goals for fun left right centre, leading them to league titles and been injury free. If this was also the case with Sterling, he'd be worth 50m. but it isn't. He is a golden boy but still a boy. If anyone pays that much over the odds, I am not sure what hte pressure will do to the boy. Liverpool are crazy to demand that much. They will lose him for peanuts next year.

[petre.ispirescu 4,928]

They must have traveled to the future where they have seen Sterling developing into Europe's best player, otherwise I can't explain myself why would anyone pay such a ridiculous amount of money on him. Yes he is talented, yes he is one of the best prospects in Europe, but definitely not worth more than 25m atm. Probably the other 25m it's because he is English and because City are the ultimate clowns on the market. Overpaying like that has nothing to do with the HG quota, simply shows how vulnerable and stupid you are.

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

they are using the £35m they paid for Andy Carroll as a benchmark for how much Sterling is worth.

[zolayes 14,489]

they are using the £35m they paid for Andy Carroll as a benchmark for how much Sterling is worth.

or what we paid for Torres

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

i try not to think about that 3 year nightmare.

[LondonsFinest 692]

If they nick that type of money for him, they have made the transfer of the summer, even if they fail to attract any top talent.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

David Luiz probabyl thinking ''thats my boy''.

[cadenza666 221]

50m ? wouldnt pay not a cent more than 15 million!

[Mechromancer 262]

Sterling spends more money in the crack for the weekend.

[Oscar 441]

City loves to overpay with these transfers still...

Sinclair.

Rodwell.

Milner.

They could just promote some of their youth guys and buy foreigners instead.

They sold nastasic for peanuts as well

[Tautvix 1,321]

Sky sources understand that Chelsea are extremely interested inLiverpool forward Raheem Sterling. The club highly rate the 20-year-old but will not bid more than £40million for him.

[LondonsFinest 692]

Sky sources understand that Chelsea are extremely interested inLiverpool forward Raheem Sterling. The club highly rate the 20-year-old but will not bid more than £40million for him.

That's fake, mate.

[Polo7 3,496]

That's fake, mate.

No its not. On their transfer section of the website.

http://www1.skysports.com/transfer-centre/

[LondonsFinest 692]

No its not. On their transfer section of the website.

http://www1.skysports.com/transfer-centre/

Oh, I am sorry. I only checked their twitter page and saw nothing , so I assume it wrong. My bad.

[Jase 43,479]

City don't have a clue, do they? Seem to be splashing the cash around just to get HG players.

Paying 50m for a player who hasn't even done anything of note is farcical.