Jump to content

Chelsea lodge complaint about Clattenberg


bababoom
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just hate when ppl make those comments. How do u know that? And do you really think Mata would make something like that up?

More importantly why would they go apeshit? The whole problem is here is their all meant to be paid enough to be professional and clatternburg was the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's a very broad definition which means that ethnicity is just a synonym for nationality. I don't agree (and neither do all dictionaries). I would say that Basque is an ethnicity and Catalan is an ethnicity but Spanish is a nationality. Azpilicueta comes from a Basque region with Basque cultures, and a Basque language. How is he of the same cultural heritage as say Mata or Busquets? It becomes a an absolutely meaningless.term. Anyways, my broader point is that what the ref was alleged to have said to Mata is not of the same seriousness as what he is alleged to have said to Mikel. (Not disputing that it isn't acceptable).

Ethnicity is not a synonym for nationality. Nationality is derived from one's origin to a particular nation state e.g American (USA), Spanish (Spain), British (England) etc. Ethnicity is about a group and its shared interests and connections hence language, dress, lifestyle (culture,norms) etc would indicate one's ethnicity. This group can range from a group of ppl from a particular region, nation, community, a workplace,a football team etc. basically there can be many ethnicities existing within one nation state. Since culture isn't the only aspect of one's ethnicity it is possible for Mata, Azpilicueta etc to share a cultural heritage which would be a part of the wider cultural heritage of the Spanish nationality and still be of differing ethnicities. Also one does not have to belong to a particular nation state to be seen as being part of that ethnicity so you can be British (nationality) and belong to the Basque ethnic group. Ethnicity is not static.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ethnicity is not a synonym for nationality. Nationality is derived from one's origin to a particular nation state e.g American (USA), Spanish (Spain), British (England) etc. Ethnicity is about a group and its shared interests and connections hence language, dress, lifestyle (culture,norms) etc would indicate one's ethnicity. This group can range from a group of ppl from a particular region, nation, community, a workplace,a football team etc. basically there can be many ethnicities existing within one nation state. Since culture isn't the only aspect of one's ethnicity it is possible for Mata, Azpilicueta etc to share a cultural heritage which would be a part of the wider cultural heritage of the Spanish nationality and still be of differing ethnicities. Also one does not have to belong to a particular nation state to be seen as being part of that ethnicity so you can be British (nationality) and belong to the Basque ethnic group. Ethnicity is not static.

Plus ethnicity is different from "race". Race is more generic than ethnicity, if you call someone black, you dont want to know if he is from Ethiopia, Kenya or Nigeria. These 3 countries have distinctive ethinic groups as their major population.

Chinese and korean are two distinctive ethnic groups, but in the west we think they have the same race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus ethnicity is different from "race". Race is more generic than ethnicity, if you call someone black, you dont want to know if he is from Ethiopia, Kenya or Nigeria. These 3 countries have distinctive ethinic groups as their major population.

Chinese and korean are two distinctive ethnic groups, but in the west we think they have the same race.

Race is often seen as phenotypical meaning it's identify by physical attributes (body shapes, skin colour etc) and biological make up. I didn't mention race frankly because I don't believe in the word race and how it is defined. It's a social construct that to me has no relevant meaning because at the DNA level all humans are same.

But yes, you would be correct in saying that it does not correctly identify one's nationality or ethnicity but is often used as a way of doing so.

snapback.png

Henrique, on 29 October 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:

http://www.dailymail...ow-erupted.html

Wow, it seems Luiz and Ramires are the ones that heard the racial slur.

Does Ramires even speak english? I know Luiz has learned quite a lot of it. So Mikel didn't not even hear this alleged abuse taking place. I can easily see this going to a "Luiz and Ramires misunderstood" saga. Of course Man u players are not going to be helpful...someone actually expected them to lmbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is what we were all waiting for, the moment this turns against us: Apparently someone from our team told the ref: "I'll break your fu**ing legs". Now to just sit around, wait for Cuntenburg to be cleared and our player receive a ban..

http://www.101greatgoals.com/comment-analysis-round-up/chelseas-ramires-luiz-say-clattenburg-racially-slurred-mikel-ref-argues-he-said-nothing-was-told-ill-fg-break-your-legs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I´ve got a bad feeling about this. The whole story isn´t boding particulary well, is it.

I think it is a loose-loose situation really.

If Clattenberg was to be found guilty that would be an absolute shocker and, personally speaking, would dampen my attitude towards football. A ref found guilty of racism towards a black player and a spanish player, that is really the icing on the cake. So on one hand I really whish that Cl. didn´t say such things.

On the other hand if Clattenberg was to be found not guilty, Chelsea are in even deeper shit. Not only had we had Terry-Gate then, Clatten-gate would be even worse. Chelsea ,after loosing a vital match because of reffing, then filing a complaint about racist language to get back at the FA ? I really, really, really hope not! Although Mata and Mikel seem to be credible players and I can´t see why eitherone would make such things up or say something unsenseable given the context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fast forward to...

...Clattenburg cleared and the book being thrown at Chelsea player/s.

There is no chance of Clattenburg being found guilty - The FA cannot allow such a scenario to exist. Mikel will receive a long ban for the (accusation).

Just when I thought it couldn't get any worse...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can see this whole thing turning sour for us. Just what we didn't need right after terry-gate. Turns out mata nor Torres heard anything regarding this. Nor did mikel.

On top of that it seems one of our players (and the finger is slowly pointing in the direction of JT) thought it would be a good idea to go in the referees dressing room and start threatening to "fucking break your legs". If terry is the culprit, I can see some heads rolling because of it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...