Jump to content

Daniel Sturridge


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

HAHA. That is EXACLY what Torres keeps doing over and over again. Loses the ball 80% of the times.

And if you actually couldnt see the differance in when we played danny and torres u lack the ability to analyze. He was more of a target man for our playmakers, he created space, his movement was great..with abit better finishing he would have scored at least one goal.

As I said, look at Lukaku. He hardly played anything here, got 5-10mins here and there and his touch was awful. Now he looks ALOT better, why? Because he magically got better or because he's getting more playtime?

Haha.. you're doing it again - when someone disagrees with you, even politely, you take it so personally and start to call them retards or incompetent.. fine by me.. I've got a thick skin and a sense of humor, but a lot of people will start to fight with you over this.

Edit: On a serious note, Lukaku's loan is coming along nicely indeed but I hope it will help him develop into Chelsea's first team also. Remember, Sturridge also had a very successful loan spell at Bolton but is still being -presumably- sold. You might argue that he isn't given a proper chance - in which you'd be correct - but I trust the coaching staff 100% in choosing the right team and evaluating the team bcs they are there 24/7 observing their every movement in games/training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha.. you're doing it again - when someone disagrees with you, even politely, you take it so personally and start to call them retards or incompetent.. fine by me.. I've got a thick skin and a sense of humor, but a lot of people will start to fight with you over this.

Cant see that I used the word retard in what you quoted.

However, am I wrong in what I said?

"He was more of a target man for our playmakers, he created space, his movement was great..with abit better finishing he would have scored at least one goal.

As I said, look at Lukaku. He hardly played anything here, got 5-10mins here and there and his touch was awful. Now he looks ALOT better, why? Because he magically got better or because he's getting more playtime?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant see that I used the word retard in what you quoted.

However, am I wrong in what I said?

"He was more of a target man for our playmakers, he created space, his movement was great..with abit better finishing he would have scored at least one goal.

As I said, look at Lukaku. He hardly played anything here, got 5-10mins here and there and his touch was awful. Now he looks ALOT better, why? Because he magically got better or because he's getting more playtime?"

You brought the word retard up when replying to Corner if im not mistaking.. cba looking it up.. other that that replied to your other half of the post with editing my previous post in reply to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You brought the word retard up when replying to Corner if im not mistaking.. cba looking it up.. other that that replied to your other half of the post with editing my previous in reply to you.

Regarding what you edited, i dont have 100% faith in team selections, the staff etc. And to me it is very simple. When choosing between Torres who already had loads of playtime and our ONLY OTHER STRIKER, and still choose Torres, that to me is blunt stuipid. And i dont care if Danny had been the most childish, disrespectful, selfish bastard there is, he still should of gotten alot more playtime....for the sake of the team and the points and possible goals.

I dont think people understand how many problems a real striker would solve..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I dont understand how people cant see that. They dont see what danny created with his movement, they only see that he failed to score some really good chances. Not wierd considering that he had been injured and didnt play many minutes at all lately.

that is y i am telling u to avoid these torres fan girls..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well hopefully you now jump ship to whichever club Sturridge goes to and continue your weird and unjustified wankfest over him. Goodbye.
You've got some absolute idiotic logic going on there. Just because I said I'm happy Sturridge's moving for his sake doesn't mean I'm going to jump ship. I've supported CFC a long time before Sturridge. I've probably been to more CFC games than you.

There's no "wankfest" at all either, I rate Sturridge as a player and all I asked was that he was given a proper chance. Didn't know that that qualified as a wankfest. There's no need to get bitchy because someone has a different opinion to you. Grow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is y i am telling u to avoid these torres fan girls..

Who here is a Torres fan girl? Why is it with you that anyone who doesn't think Sturridge is a great player is a 'Torres fan girl'.

Some people happen to think both Torres and Sturridge aren't that great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who here is a Torres fan girl? Why is it with you that anyone who doesn't think Sturridge is a great player is a 'Torres fan girl'.

Some people happen to think both Torres and Sturridge aren't that great.

anyone who critzises danny more than torres is a torres fangirl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone who critzises danny more than torres is a torres fangirl

Sturridge is a great player in theory. In practice he simply isn't that good. He's frustrating to watch and we got everything we deserved when we agreed to pay a player with less than a dozen starts £60k a week when his old club wouldn't.

He's 23, he's been let go by 2 of the best 3 clubs in England and his only option is a mid-table side who have spent £70 millon on Andy Carroll, Jordan Henderson and Stewart Downing in the last couple of years.

I think we'll survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who here is a Torres fan girl? Why is it with you that anyone who doesn't think Sturridge is a great player is a 'Torres fan girl'.

Some people happen to think both Torres and Sturridge aren't that great.

when u read things like "danny got his chances but could never do anything" then u know what that person is. danny is a real good striker and he ll prove it when he gets more than 20 mins on the pitch in 2 consecutive matches and its just sad that we are letting this guy go because we want the blonde's investment to pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torres has had 2 and a half years of utter mediocrity, yet after his first 6 months and waiting 11 hours to score his first and only goal of that season people still thought he should get another chance. Than into his second season he went 24 hours without a goal and was dropped for all our biggest games - people still said give him a chance. If Sturridge was given 1/4 of the chances Torres had received and had not taken them it would be fair to say he should be sold - but a lot of you are hypocrites citing 2 matches for his failure, one of which he scored in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You