LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 I forgot about the Ledley King thing.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Anton actually said he didnt heard Terry saying those stuff about him but someone told him he said that after it "happend"?What a joke! how this story is still on? the guy doesnt have any evidnce even! who exactly told him Terry said those stuff?Why nobody get up and say he heard it?Think he decided afters that he did hear what was 'said' well in the paper world anywayBut agree it is daft that he's 'key witness'...if he didnt hear it he cant give evidence! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok 1 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 This is a chelsea fan site. Go talk out of your ass somewhere else.Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh?Was it said in a racist intent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh?If the video evidence shows it why is it taking so long? Why is there so much debate to what he said?Surley if it was clear enough the verdict would've been reached by now as however not everyone has the lip reading skills you obviously do..its still on going Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 This whole thing just makes me so sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok 1 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Was it said in a racist intent?Aye, 'black c'nt' was totally unintentional in context.If it was said to a Chelsea player would intent be an excuse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok 1 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 If the video evidence shows it why is it taking so long? Why is there so much debate to what he said?Surley if it was clear enough the verdict would've been reached by now as however not everyone has the lip reading skills you obviously do..its still on goingGreat. The best defence is that it's taking so long. Nevermind the fact that he's been accused of racism by the player involved, been caught on video saying it, admitted saying it, and has previous for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 Aye, 'black c'nt' was totally unintentional in context.If it was said to a Chelsea player would intent be an excuse?No. I'd be riled up of course..However, consider the context wasn't actually in a hateful manner. Or do you believe this is irrelevant? Because then I believe the definition of "racism" isn't properly identified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok 1 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 No. I'd be riled up of course..However, consider the context wasn't actually in a hateful manner. Or do you believe this is irrelevant? Because then I believe the definition of "racism" isn't properly identified.Racism, is racism, is racism for me. I really do think it's irrelevant when it comes to things like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 Racism, is racism, is racism for me. I really do think it's irrelevant when it comes to things like that.Fair enough.How did you feel when Buquets got away with calling Marcelo a "monkey" this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaChick 430 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 To call someone black is not racist, its like calling a fat person a fat cunt, you are what you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewok 1 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Fair enough.How did you feel when Buquets got away with calling Marcelo a "monkey" this year?I'm not sure if you can compare the two, simply because the player involved with Terry has made a complaint. I know that's a fine line, but the fact is, a black player has complained about racial abuse to him, and there is evidence of thus. We can't tell him he shouldn't, just because of who's involved.Busquets should have had the book thrown at him, just as Terry and Suarez should if proven guilty. The fact Busquets wasn't prosecueted, doesn't mean he's not racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 I'm not sure if you can compare the two, simply because the player involved with Terry has made a complaint. I know that's a fine line, but the fact is, a black player has complained about racial abuse to him, and there is evidence of thus. We can't tell him he shouldn't, just because of who's involved.Busquets should have had the book thrown at him, just as Terry and Suarez should if proven guilty. The fact Busquets wasn't prosecueted, doesn't mean he's not racist.I think it's right there's an investigation, because Terry's explanation is weak & warrants one.However TheFA are making a complete hash of it. That's why the head of Kick It Out campaign is close to resigning because The FA won't grow some balls and make a decision. The longer it goes on, the further Terry's name gets dragged through the mud.However, racism isn't the only thing wrong in football at this moment. How many actual criminals are we allowing in the game at the moment? Marlon King, Joey Barton ect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Presumption of innocence.... I suggest you research what it is, Ewok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcherfromafar 11 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 I understand the FA doing what they are doing, but can't get why the police have anything to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 I understand the FA doing what they are doing, but can't get why the police have anything to do with it.I thought the same... if it was a police matter, then our shonex would already be serving his sentence (sorry shon ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drogba11CFC 108 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Regarding Ewok 8 (Who, like AF, is probably trying to tar the entire CFC fanbase with one brush): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK269WcHMpM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 I'm not sure if you can compare the two, simply because the player involved with Terry has made a complaint. I know that's a fine line, but the fact is, a black player has complained about racial abuse to him, and there is evidence of thus. We can't tell him he shouldn't, just because of who's involved.Busquets should have had the book thrown at him, just as Terry and Suarez should if proven guilty. The fact Busquets wasn't prosecueted, doesn't mean he's not racist.Youve been a member of the forum for almost 6 months but this seems to be the only topic to interest you . YOU have already prejudged the issue ..so no reason will sway your obviously biased views .. Good bye take your bile with your Daily Mail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Yeah, let's all do a merry dance around the fact that there is a very good chance he's guilty and blame the JT loving media. It's not as if he has got away with it before. Not one person here can tell me he didn't do the same to Ledley King. But sure, there's a media vendetta don't you know.Only one England captain, eh?Ewok what team do you support?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.