Jump to content

John Terry: Racist slur?


LDN Blue
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ugh, just ban him already, or let him go.

Personally I think the evidence suggests he is not guilty... Ferdinand wasn't even aware of any abuse during the game, then all of a sudden after it was brought to his attention he began to play the villain. Terry would have to be ridiculously stupid to look forward to 'clearing [his] name' - and he'd be even dimmer to spout racist abuse next to the referee... especially next to Ashley Cole and Anelka!

Then again, he is a footballer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 984
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, let's all do a merry dance around the fact that there is a very good chance he's guilty and blame the JT loving media. It's not as if he has got away with it before. Not one person here can tell me he didn't do the same to Ledley King. But sure, there's a media vendetta don't you know.

Only one England captain, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's all do a merry dance around the fact that there is a very good chance he's guilty and blame the JT loving media. It's not as if he has got away with it before. Not one person here can tell me he didn't do the same to Ledley King. But sure, there's a media vendetta don't you know.

Only one England captain, eh?

Cute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's all do a merry dance around the fact that there is a very good chance he's guilty and blame the JT loving media. It's not as if he has got away with it before. Not one person here can tell me he didn't do the same to Ledley King. But sure, there's a media vendetta don't you know.

Only one England captain, eh?

This is a chelsea fan site. Go talk out of your ass somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anton actually said he didnt heard Terry saying those stuff about him but someone told him he said that after it "happend"?

What a joke! how this story is still on? the guy doesnt have any evidnce even! who exactly told him Terry said those stuff?

Why nobody get up and say he heard it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anton actually said he didnt heard Terry saying those stuff about him but someone told him he said that after it "happend"?

What a joke! how this story is still on? the guy doesnt have any evidnce even! who exactly told him Terry said those stuff?

Why nobody get up and say he heard it?

Yeah spot on mate. As long as the intended target never heard Terry being racist, what is he complaining about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's all do a merry dance around the fact that there is a very good chance he's guilty and blame the JT loving media. It's not as if he has got away with it before. Not one person here can tell me he didn't do the same to Ledley King. But sure, there's a media vendetta don't you know.

Only one England captain, eh?

Yeah spot on mate. As long as the intended target never heard Terry being racist, what is he complaining about?

You are one sad little ewok. Shouldn't you be on a Star Wars fan forum or something? Additionally, I would heavily suggest that your mum suspend your internet privileges indefinitely so that you can find something better to do with your time than make pathetic attempts at wum-ery. Oh, and yes, there is only one England captain: Mr. John Terry!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anton actually said he didnt heard Terry saying those stuff about him but someone told him he said that after it "happend"?

What a joke! how this story is still on? the guy doesnt have any evidnce even! who exactly told him Terry said those stuff?

Why nobody get up and say he heard it?

Think he decided afters that he did hear what was 'said' well in the paper world anyway

But agree it is daft that he's 'key witness'...if he didnt hear it he cant give evidence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a chelsea fan site. Go talk out of your ass somewhere else.

Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.

He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.

He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh?

Was it said in a racist intent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I may aswell take my truth elsewhere. Get behind the herd and absolutely in no way entertain the fact that the man accused, (who has already been accused of being a racist) actually was a racist, when video evidence and his own admissions actually admit to calling a fellow footballer a 'black c*nt'.

He's our JT, and he's our racist. You know what you are Anton, eh?

If the video evidence shows it why is it taking so long? Why is there so much debate to what he said?Surley if it was clear enough the verdict would've been reached by now as however not everyone has the lip reading skills you obviously do..its still on going

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the video evidence shows it why is it taking so long? Why is there so much debate to what he said?Surley if it was clear enough the verdict would've been reached by now as however not everyone has the lip reading skills you obviously do..its still on going

Great. The best defence is that it's taking so long. Nevermind the fact that he's been accused of racism by the player involved, been caught on video saying it, admitted saying it, and has previous for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, 'black c'nt' was totally unintentional in context.

If it was said to a Chelsea player would intent be an excuse?

No. I'd be riled up of course..

However, consider the context wasn't actually in a hateful manner. Or do you believe this is irrelevant? Because then I believe the definition of "racism" isn't properly identified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I'd be riled up of course..

However, consider the context wasn't actually in a hateful manner. Or do you believe this is irrelevant? Because then I believe the definition of "racism" isn't properly identified.

Racism, is racism, is racism for me. I really do think it's irrelevant when it comes to things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You