Jump to content

Frank Lampard


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

I can't see how people say he was poor. He was poor first half like the rest of the team but second half improved by miles. Won tackles, played decent passes and contributed like the rest of the team to our brilliant second half performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need for that as Luiz can do it much better.

Well our back four was not play high up the pitch. We wanted those long balls on the counter, not when we have possession high up the pitch. Anyway, Frank didn't do too well either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank and Rammy bossed the midfield in the second half ,we took the game to Spurs they worked as a pair ,nobody was hanging back filling gaps that we make for ourselves by errrrr...... hanging back and leaving your partner in midfield isolated .

All of a sudden Spurs midfield were filling gaps and not marking our runners in the second half ,that does tend to happen when you take the game to the opposition rather than errrrr.... sitting back and let them attack you and control the midfield .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched the full game on TV now and him and Rammy were superb in the second half,dominated the Spurs midfield,why?,because they worked together and pushed Spurs back ,not one of them just sitting and letting the other battle alone. Lamps won a lot of tackles second half,him and Rammy bossed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Frank and our's sake, he cannot play in these games any more.

And people laughed when I said he'd get annihilated agains Spurs new breed of midfielders. He never had mobility as a strength, image now at 35.

What an absoloute lod of bull,Mikel was annihalated first half he has no mobility and strength ,second half Frank and Rammy bossed it ,but either would have been annihalated on their own against them with Mikel hanging back and slowing the play down,allowing the Spurs midfield to dominate.

Watch the match again and the evidence will surely outweigh your pre judgements and then you were mad enough to claim you were right :D:D:D .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Phil, I hold my hands up and say that in the second half our Frank was much much better with the help of Ramires. But that's always the thing with Frankie, in his prime, he was an utter star, but at 35 his mobility is mostly gone, and in those two pivots we can't afford to have a lack of physical prowess against the top sides, it's not his fault, it's not him being lazy or slacking around not caring, he cares more than others, but age is catching up with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Phil, I hold my hands up and say that in the second half our Frank was much much better with the help of Ramires. But that's always the thing with Frankie, in his prime, he was an utter star, but at 35 his mobility is mostly gone, and in those two pivots we can't afford to have a lack of physical prowess against the top sides, it's not his fault, it's not him being lazy or slacking around not caring, he cares more than others, but age is catching up with him.

You are dead right ,hence we need Mikel nowhere near a pivot place at Chelsea. You must always remember Jose's words he watches the player not the birth certificate ,as I do ,you will be told when Lampard is finished and it is not yet . Here is a prediction ,he will be offered another year contract by the manager who knows best. His mobility is not gone in extra time of the European Super Cup and in the Europa League final he was as mobile as anyone in extra time ,he is a fitness freak like Giggs. Forget the age watch the performance v Spurs when he and Rammy bossed them .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year he had a smaller role than now, and when people said a contract extension was wise, it was primarily about his leadership abilities and his professional attitude that could rub off on the younger players. Gamewise it was expected that his role would diminish further.

No way could it have been expected that he'd suddenly once again be a starting XI player. In one of the most crucial positions of the team. If you compare him to the players that other top teams have in that position, it's quite embarrassing, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are dead right ,hence we need Mikel nowhere near a pivot place at Chelsea. You must always remember Jose's words he watches the player not the birth certificate ,as I do ,you will be told when Lampard is finished and it is not yet . Here is a prediction ,he will be offered another year contract by the manager who knows best. His mobility is not gone in extra time of the European Super Cup and in the Europa League final he was as mobile as anyone in extra time ,he is a fitness freak like Giggs. Forget the age watch the performance v Spurs when he and Rammy bossed them .

United fans have been calling for Giggs to retire for as long as i can remember. If he carries on much longer he is in serious danger of doing damage to his legend tag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank did not own Paulinho Phil, you are looking at things sentimentally as opposed to objectively.

Tottenham have an excellent selection for the two pivots in Sando, Paulinho, Capoue and Dembele, although City top them with Yaya and Fernandinho - who is a colossal player - , I believe Ramires would still walk into their first 11, but not Lampard of nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You