Domino- 116 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 22 Million is a bit pricey. However, it is probably a bargain given todays standards.That's today's prices are pretty exceeded by greedy owners. Spike 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 His house could be a gutter. You can kind of own a gutter, right?I lived in a gutter for 7 and a half years and I know what type person it turns you into. A strong one.I'n sure this has been said before but I'll say it again: Do we need Lukaku when we have Sturridge?Yes - to partner with Sturridge when Drogba is just in the history books, Torres is set for the retirement home and after Anelka has been shipped off to the MLS . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I'n sure this has been said before but I'll say it again: Do we need Lukaku when we have Sturridge?Yes. Yesterday Sturridge played as a RW, which i think he will continue to play. While Lukaku is a real Striker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ack17 205 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 22m is a joke. We can get Falcao with 26m few days ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest justin_3d Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 A lot of money for him....I am still in the middle ground with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 4,400 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 £22m is a lot but he's got 10 years plus with us and has every chance of making £22m sound a bargain. He must really have something to be that expensive tho, he's certainly built like a brick shit 'ouse. We really need to hurry the fuck up and get some players. Still concerned at the lack of winger interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domino- 116 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 In my opinion, render any prolongation of this saga is due to several facts:1. The first fact, and perhaps the most important differences in the parameters of the transfer itself. More unofficial information from Anderlecht want sum close to 30 million Lukaku. Chelsea aim to contracts for far less that makes sense and transfer tape for himself.2. The second fact is that still do not know what will happen with Drogba and Anelka will go there you will remain. Transfer Lukaku will receive one of the attackers as а large number add young Sturridge. I think it is even better and proper management to sell before making.3. Coach himself has not decided whether he wants to keep Drogba and Anelka to try to take their deputies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker10 946 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Paying the reported 22m for a player who has 12 months left on his contract is insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 22m = euros? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Paying the reported 22m for a player who has 12 months left on his contract is insane.He has a contract untill 2015 at Anderlecht..22m is a joke. We can get Falcao with 26m few days ago.Falcao signed a new contract last week at Porto i believe.. ZanSnake 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 22m = NO THANKS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea blue 615 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Chelsea target Romelu Lukaku scores a hat trick yesterday against FC Brussels still a lot of money but we should sign him or he will go to Arsanal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 For that price We could buy that Ivorian kid that scored thousands of goals in U-17 and We still would save a lot of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldo 868 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 For that price We could buy that Ivorian kid that scored thousands of goals in U-17 and We still would save a lot of money.His price is 60k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mart 29 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Club should be looking to pay between 10m-15m. Personally I think he will flop if we do sign him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 His price is 60k What?Club should be looking to pay between 10m-15m. Personally I think he will flop if we do sign him.Drogba was also a flop in his first 2 seasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEssien 127 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 For that price We could buy that Ivorian kid that scored thousands of goals in U-17 and We still would save a lot of money.OR we could buy Lukaku who scores goals in REAL internationals and in Europe and is a starter for his team. Bit of a shit comment there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 What?Drogba was also a flop in his first 2 seasons.I would'nt go that far, he did ok in his first couple of season it was just Lamps, Robben, Terry, Gallas, Crespo J.Cole and Duff were all chipping in with their fair share of goals aswell, in 06/07 only Lamps out of that group were still scoring J.Cole got injured all season, Duff, Crespo and Gallas left and Robben and Terry's goals dried up which meant Drogs has more responsibility which he took superbly. Term-X 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 OR we could buy Lukaku who scores goals in REAL internationals and in Europe and is a starter for his team. Bit of a shit comment there.Against FC Brussels and against Arzeibaijan.Shit comment there.Lukaku is a gamble and his goals agaisnt lesser sides doesnt change that. Madmax 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I would'nt go that far, he did ok in his first couple of season it was just Lamps, Robben, Terry, Gallas, Crespo J.Cole and Duff were all chipping in with their fair share of goals aswell, in 06/07 only Lamps out of that group were still scoring J.Cole got injured all season, Duff, Crespo and Gallas left and Robben and Terry's goals dried up which meant Drogs has more responsibility which he took superbly.In his 2 first seasons he was anything but superb. Even Mourinho said he expected him to score more goals.For me it was a huge surprise that he scored many goals when Shevchenko arrived. When can say that was his first season here as a world class player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.