Jump to content

Romelu Lukaku


Jose M
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want him loaned out to West Brom for next season as well (so 18 more months from now). It is not because I dont think he is good enough or anything (apart from his abismal first touch, he is quite good), it is because we will certainly buy a ST in the summer and if we dont get rid of Torres he will get almost zero playing time.

He is happy and playing (and scoring) regularly! The best thing for his development is to stay like this for another season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seemingly, so the article goes on Lukaku to stay much longer if he hits a certain number of appearances this season.

Now, my question: Who authorized it ?

Here is a kid Chelsea spent 18m. He has knocked in 9 goals so far & might not even play for Chelsea for months.

Are those at Chelsea´s office totally fucking clueless ?

They're actually thinking long-term which is what the club didn't do five years ago. They're looking at getting the most out of a player over the long-term rather than running around like headless chickens throwing money around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're actually thinking long-term which is what the club didn't do five years ago. They're looking at getting the most out of a player over the long-term rather than running around like headless chickens throwing money around.

As I said the other day, Chelsea should strongly consider getting into buying & renting players. It might be a very fruitful business.

Let me try one hypothetical question here. Assume Roman packs Torres out somewhere, anywhere. Lukaku plays certain amount of games & stays with WB. What then ?

To me that clause in his loan has no merit, providing it´s valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're actually thinking long-term which is what the club didn't do five years ago. They're looking at getting the most out of a player over the long-term rather than running around like headless chickens throwing money around.

case 1 we take Lukaku back next season to bolster our nearly empty striker contingent

case 2 we extent his loan, only got one or two strikers and have to splash out to get someone else.

In which scenario we are more likely to throw around money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he meant to properly spit at Walker, but there was intent. It's a logical red, especially as Clattenberg was looking right at them.

Yeah, it looked like he was spitting in disgust and not at Walker. That is, unless, Popov's spitting is as wayward as some of his crosses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You