OneMoSalah

Is that a good or a bad thing haha? And anyway, time to put some bacon and sausages on, can't beat a bit of breakfast.

I only watched it because well I couldn't find the remote and couldn't be arsed moving. 2 fucking episodes too, roughly an hour of my life I'll never get back. Must be shit being like 6 years old and having to watch such bullshit. They should stick Dragonball Z back on TV, fuck the Hoobs.

The Hoobs..... and I'll try and find this advert on youtube, its ridiculous. Some fattish guy states if he was a meal, he'd be a ready meal, when its ironic he said that as he looks as if hes devoured millions of them. state of that video. state of that show in general. those are the sort of people i'd love to batter with a shovel.

We could always run him in the grand national tbh.

I am sitting watching the Hoobs.......... fuck i hate tv, they know who i am and should put some interesting shit on around this time. Also has anyone else seen this brand new made in chelsea advert btw? The fat cunt goes if I were a meal I'd be a ready meal, fucking right you would you fat fuck.

Totally agree, they objected appointing him in 2008 because his outspoken and egoistic ways. I think Mancini will leave and Frank De Boer will be appointed tbh.

Doing an allnighter, fuck the system.

Going to stick my neck out, Jose to come in, turn Nando into a beast again, 40 goals next year. Meh I'm just talking bullshit haha.

Wrong. Coutinho is also a #10 but plays as a winger for Liverpool. Like Hazard is a #10 but is playing as a winger for us. Coutinho isn't rated as highly as Oscar. He may be playing better but hes NOT the better player. Coutinho has rarely broken through for the Selecao, he has 1 cap which he gained in 2010 in a bounce game against Iran. Oscar has more senior NT caps and U20 caps than him for a reason.

Coutinho (2) has more goals than Oscar (1) but Oscar has 4 assists where as Coutinho has 3 in the PL. The difference is Oscar has played 28 PL games (19 starts, 9 sub appearances) and Coutinho has played 7 since he signed (6 starts, 1 sub apperance) but you have to remember Liverpool have scored 28 goals since the arrival of Coutinho where as Chelsea have scored 22 goals since he arrived. Coutinho has started every game for Liverpool since his move where as Oscar has also been rotated in and out of the team. As a footballer I'd personally say Oscar edges it in terms of ability but hes not used to the rigors of a 50-60 game season where as Coutinho has played for Inter since he was 18, experiencing CL football for a few years and 50 games a season before even though he was loaned out to Espanyol half way through last year. Both are great prospects, I've followed Coutinho since Rafa gave him his debut at Inter, he was one of the better young players in Europe at that time before he lost his form due to injuries and managerial changes. Oscar has been good for us this year but is tired and failing to play well every week and the fact hes being moved to the right to compensate for Mata doesn't help. He needs to play centrally for us to see the best of him as he isn't quite as explosive as Coutinho is. The two years of European experience Coutinho has gives him a slightly advantage in terms of fitness and physicality of the European game compared to the South American game. Oscar will be the better player though. Just give him time. His all round game is better than Coutinho's. Oscar has incredible footballing intelligence, which I feel Coutinho doesn't have. He also doesn't or didn't at Inter, work hard enough out of possession where as Oscar as we've seen against countless times, does work off the ball when he loses it.

Who the fuck cut Kyle Walkers hair? Edward Scissorhands...... can't find a picture but it looks exactly like Prince Boateng and El Sharaawy's hair but since hes a Spurs player I'm making fun of him.

Today he worked hard for the team. Was positive, played his part in the first goal. He didn't really get any chances. Still a waste of 50m though.

I think if Mata or Hazard are benched in a 4-3-3, at least we've got a game changer on the bench then. Oscar would have to play a bit further forward in an inverted 4-3-3 tbh.

Its a joke, someone hacked his twitter. The girl posted something to him like 'so I don't have good banter???'

Personally I'd prefer to see one out of Hazard or Mata on the left in a 4-3-3 with Moses on the right and Ba in the middle as we wouldn't be so narrow with both Juan and Eden coming infield the whole time. Sounds odd but I think if we did go back to 4-3-3 it would be more like a 4-3-2-1 with both Juan and Eden in the team.

Hopefully we go back to 4-3-3 and see him rotated with Mikel. Loved this lad under AVB, was calm everytime he had the ball. Honestly think he could grow and become our very own Sergio Busquets, just a bit balder. He has great positional sense, distribution, reads the game well etc, all the ingredients for a top DM. Just need to go back to 4-3-3 which suits him and Rami imo.

We didn't go into bad form because of the psychological effect of loosing against United in that manner. The squad was tired, we have a very small squad, players like Oscar, Mata, Hazard, Ramires, Torres, Cole, Ivanovic, Luiz etc were playing 180 minutes a week. The lesser teams we managed to beat because we had that bit of quality despite players being tired. United were strong and energetic all over the pitch due to rotation and quality in their 25 man squad where as some of our players were absolutely fucked due to midweek games etc and well as good and entertaining as our offensive football was, we suffered defensively against United who play through their wings a lot. Cole and Ivanovic were usually up against Valencia and Rafael or Nani and Evra due to the lack of defensive work from whoever was given the two wide positions off the ball. We did play well to get it back to 2-2 but United helped us in that manner as they let us have the share of the ball, with 9 men it was impossible as certain players were that tired from doing double or triple the amount of running they had to do usually due to the sending offs. Di Matteo going back to basics wouldn't have done anything. It showed vs Juve, we basically played 5 at the back and still conceded 3. His 'luck' possibly ran out. We played poorly under him just before Rafa came in, we'd only won 2 games in 6 or 8 I think it was. Going back to basics after that still would have been pointless. It won us the CL because we had limited players that weren't good enough to control games against Bayern, Barca, Benfica and Napoli in Europe but we could let them commit players forward, stay compact and use the pace of Ramires, Kalou, Torres, Bosingwa, Mata, Sturridge and whoever else to get up the pitch. We still don't have the right player to go next to Mikel or Romeu to control bigger European games in my opinion (but at least we have more creative players than Ramires Kalou and Sturridge to play in the three so we are kind of half way there). Di Matteo gave himself and Rafa and potentially the next coach a problem by not signing a central midfielder who could do such a thing. This stuck out like a sore thumb in pre-season too. I'm not saying Rafa is the right coach, hell no but in terms of rotation and use of the squad we've got, hes been very sensible with using the squad players (Marko, Yossi, Ryan, Victor, Romeu) to rest players to try prevent fatigue and injuries despite results. Robbie had implemented a good idea in terms of playing style offensively but defensively we were a mess, he failed to overcome the problem that ultimately cost him his job in a way; to get the offensive players to defend when we didn't have the ball. Rafa didn't solve that completely but against City (the borefest game) we were better as a unit. I remember Mikels interview after the Juve game in Turin before Rafa was appointed, he said without the ball it was a nightmare and he hit the nail on the head. Which even against the MLS team, PSG and Brighton in pre-season you could have said without the ball we caused ourselves problems all day. The signs were there. The thing about RDM not getting enough time is a myth. He was on borrowed time from the day he signed that 2 year deal. He would have been sacked the following season had he won the PL unbeaten because Roman wanted Pep to rebuild Chelsea. I'm not trying to say Robbie was a bad coach or that but he wasn't the right man to rebuild Chelsea especially as he had never rebuilt a squad in his whole career. He brought the feel good factor back after AVB's sacking (even though I believed AVB deserved time as he actually had a plan to rebuild the squad and change the philosophy), that's for sure and he did very well to win us two big trophies with that squad. Robbie's a better manager because of his experience here and it will benefit him greatly if he gets another top coaching position.

More football later today, yay... good to get a game 2 or 3 days after the last one. Must get some sleep though.....

4-1 to us Ba hattrick, there I said it, optimistic but still.

Where is your vocal masterpiece Jake?????

No singing!

Top gun pfft, sit down..... Anyway I must get out of bed, fucking after 4 o'clock, see what you guys and your pot talk has done to me, absolutely ruined me (not really, just couldn't be arsed getting up because I had football last night and have a slightly sore leg after a robust tackle I made, even Roy Keane would be proud because hes a hardy bastard) Top Gun?

why the fuck cant i use memes....... edit: ok i can now... anyway in response to you using swag, wow... just wow Jake.....

Lmfao. Poor spike #cutforspike

no thanks, I refuse to listen to Justin Beiber because 1) hes a dickhead and 2) manpe or Naked Mole Rat tried to sing baby and nearly killed me........ so never mind sing it... I would rather eat my foot.