herpthederp

He was better than Barkley.

He was better than Barkley.

He was better than Barkley.

You damn right should be. Also worth noting this tweet:
 
 

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

Why would any young academy prospect show loyalty to Chelsea when Chelsea shows no loyalty to them? The club can't even bring itself to be a meritocracy, never mind a place that takes a chance on them.

He needs to leave one way or another. He clearly has the physicality and the technical ability to play in the men's game.

He needs to leave one way or another. He clearly has the physicality and the technical ability to play in the men's game.

Just scored another against Oldham.
 
 

We keep him on loan until he has an off season and then claim he's not good enough. These constant loans really only do good for development for one or two seasons, but beyond that it is pointless. While Mount performing so well and confidence is high, it's best time to bring him back to the squad imo. If we must loan him, then loan him to a team in one of the top  leagues such as La Liga or Serie A, or to a club here in England. We have seen proof of what happens when you keep a player on loan for too long with the likes of Chalobah, Baker, Musonda, McCreacran etc, they stagnate and eventually their career goes nowhere. 

Scored today

Ruben Loftus-Cheek vs Kazakhstan (Home) 13/10/2015 HD

This was McEachran at 17:

He scored against Germany U19 after we'd gone down to 10 men.

Loans are really poor development tools. In truth they're more often used to put a player in the shop window than actually getting them ready for first team football. Mourinho is a good enough manager and Chelsea have a strong enough squad to take risks by developing players in the first team. A cowardice in this regard has plagued Chelsea managers since Ancelotti, and I can only assume that it comes from pressure from up high.

Loans are really poor development tools. In truth they're more often used to put a player in the shop window than actually getting them ready for first team football. Mourinho is a good enough manager and Chelsea have a strong enough squad to take risks by developing players in the first team. A cowardice in this regard has plagued Chelsea managers since Ancelotti, and I can only assume that it comes from pressure from up high.

Loans are really poor development tools. In truth they're more often used to put a player in the shop window than actually getting them ready for first team football. Mourinho is a good enough manager and Chelsea have a strong enough squad to take risks by developing players in the first team. A cowardice in this regard has plagued Chelsea managers since Ancelotti, and I can only assume that it comes from pressure from up high.

Loans are really poor development tools. In truth they're more often used to put a player in the shop window than actually getting them ready for first team football. Mourinho is a good enough manager and Chelsea have a strong enough squad to take risks by developing players in the first team. A cowardice in this regard has plagued Chelsea managers since Ancelotti, and I can only assume that it comes from pressure from up high.

Loans are really poor development tools. In truth they're more often used to put a player in the shop window than actually getting them ready for first team football. Mourinho is a good enough manager and Chelsea have a strong enough squad to take risks by developing players in the first team. A cowardice in this regard has plagued Chelsea managers since Ancelotti, and I can only assume that it comes from pressure from up high.