The English Football Thread

[milka 3,390]

 

What a losers . 😂 

Basically they hired the manager who Mourinho replaced  in Roma .

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

hace 24 minutos, milka dijo:

 

What a losers. 😂 

Basically they hired the manager who Mourinho replaced in Roma.

I mean he’s not done anything particularly interesting in his career. Its not always a fair barometer of how good a manager he is but again underwhelming spells at Porto, bit better at Braga, good spell at Shakhtar then a meh spell at Roma. It looks very middle of the road.

Its more the circus of how they’ve gone from looking at 2/3 top class options to scraping the barrel for someone, who’s just been replaced by the man they sacked also 😂. 

[milka 3,390]

 From Pochettino to Conte to Fonseca who ? 😄 Bye , bye  Harry .

 

obviously they not have   the reputation to take  a big name like Conte , Zidane 

Spuds things .

Edited June 9, 2021 by milka

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[chippy 342]

After failing to land Conte, Spuds should have taken a punt on Potter, a young, hungry manager with potential who might turn out to be as good as Poch was for them.

Fonseca is about as uninspiring as they get, so sometimes I have to feel a little bit sorry for those long suffering fans who never get to see their team even win an egg cup.🤣

[Jase 43,479]

7 hours ago, chippy said:

After failing to land Conte, Spuds should have taken a punt on Potter, a young, hungry manager with potential who might turn out to be as good as Poch was for them.

Fonseca is about as uninspiring as they get, so sometimes I have to feel a little bit sorry for those long suffering fans who never get to see their team even win an egg cup.🤣

TBF, Fonseca had a good reputation before he went to Roma. Not sure his reputation has really gone south after the stint at Roma but on paper at least, think he fits what Levy wants at Spurs. And given what Spurs can and can't afford financially, they were never going to attract a top class manager and they have always been a club who build up good teams but never have enough about them to go on and win titles.

[NikkiCFC 8,287]

 

[R2D2 368]

6 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

Still angry about that FA final even after we won the CL, we got robbed.

Edited June 10, 2021 by R2D2

[Vesper 30,095]

41 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

One change that will result from the thicker lines is that broadcasters and TV viewers will no longer see the process of drawing the offside line, just the final result.

wtf

[Jase 43,479]

 

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

17 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

How will this work?When both lines get thicker,it does not make a difference. if both lines or rather stripes now are still the same width, the edges of the lines will still underlap if there is an offside. The only sensible thing would be to make only the blue onside line that is drawn along the defender thicker so it overlaps the red offside line.

[Atomiswave 6,117]

19 hours ago, Vesper said:

One change that will result from the thicker lines is that broadcasters and TV viewers will no longer see the process of drawing the offside line, just the final result.

wtf

What did you expect my friend, its all bent, as if this new way would somehow eliminate manipulation. If they were legit and not bent then we would see and hear how they came to whatever outcome, they would be mic'ed up, and the refs allowed to be questioned and interviewed........fucking corrupt bastards. Just wait for next season if they can see we are going for the title, you'll see.

[Jase 43,479]

21 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

What happened to giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacking team on a close offside call!?