Edinson Cavani

[primax79 79]

Well it's a fact he will never give 100% for Napoli again

it's not a fact it's your opinion

I disagree

[primax79 79]

we have more than enough money you mug. just feel it is not money well spent.

Chelsea has not enough money

Maybe Abramovich has, but cannot spend them because of FPF

so Chelsea does not has 70 (or even 63) Millions to spend for whatever player, you have to consider you have to pay in one time without any mortage

[Bosnian Blue 2,471]

so Chelsea does not has 70 (or even 63) Millions to spend for whatever player, you have to consider you have to pay in one time without any mortage

We can buy your first 11 if we want to. But if we pay this kind of money now every club would do to us what Napoli is doing, so you won't see those 70M.

[primax79 79]

We can buy your first 11 if we want to. But if we pay this kind of money now every club would do to us what Napoli is doing, so you won't see those 70M.

bla bla bla

still waiting for your offer

[Marvin123 537]

it's not a fact it's your opinion

I disagree

Fact

[bluesman2610 1,418]

I say if we really want him we just wait until Aug 10th when the clause becomes null and void and he can go for his true valuation and not an inflated cost of someone who thinks they can strongarm chelsea into paying more for a player than he is actually worth.. we did this twice before in terms of strikers I doubt that we will be doing this again

[Hutcho 8,443]

I say if we really want him we just wait until Aug 10th when the clause becomes null and void and he can go for his true valuation and not an inflated cost of someone who thinks they can strongarm chelsea into paying more for a player than he is actually worth.. we did this twice before in terms of strikers I doubt that we will be doing this again

If we won't pay the clause. And won't accept anything under the clause. Why would that change when the clause expires. If anything his pricetag would go up.

[ZanSnake 1,211]

I am really starting to fucking hate the whole summer transfer window. It seems to be more like a fucking soap opera then an actual business transaction. Go in, if they say more, go onto someone else - simples! But of course this will last till August, and the first game of the PL only for him to chose another club and be a huge waste of time

[primax79 79]

If we won't pay the clause. And won't accept anything under the clause. Why would that change when the clause expires. If anything his pricetag would go up.

eheh

noone will take hm after the clause expires

the only way to take him is to pay the full clause before it expires

Napoli does not need money and does not want to sell..

[The Skipper 20,609]

Why are people still feeding the troll?

[Special Juan 28,143]

Whats happened over the last day or two?

[bluesman2610 1,418]

If we won't pay the clause. And won't accept anything under the clause. Why would that change when the clause expires. If anything his pricetag would go up.

Thats not true their position is that 63M euros or no sale if teh clause is gone they can not be as staunch in the pursuit of money for cavani.. he has two years remaining on his contract and could leave for lesser cost thats how the window works.. And if Napoli blocks his move to a team he wishes to go to then you end up with an unhappy player and unhappy player equals transfer request and that equals reduced price not more

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Whats happened over the last day or two?

Fuck none. As expected.

[primax79 79]

Thats not true their position is that 63M euros or no sale if teh clause is gone they can not be as staunch in the pursuit of money for cavani.. he has two years remaining on his contract and could leave for lesser cost thats how the window works.. And if Napoli blocks his move to a team he wishes to go to then you end up with an unhappy player and unhappy player equals transfer request and that equals reduced price not more

he is under contract until 2017

don't worry for his happiness he is a pro

[Hutcho 8,443]

Thats not true their position is that 63M euros or no sale if teh clause is gone they can not be as staunch in the pursuit of money for cavani.. he has two years remaining on his contract and could leave for lesser cost thats how the window works.. And if Napoli blocks his move to a team he wishes to go to then you end up with an unhappy player and unhappy player equals transfer request and that equals reduced price not more

They can accept less than the clause now if they wanted to...

But they don't.

If he won't accept 45 million now. Why would they after the clause expires. It changes nothing accept write now, if we pay 63 mil and agree personal terms they have to sell.

[bluesman2610 1,418]

They can accept less than the clause now if they wanted to...

But they don't.

If he won't accept 45 million now. Why would they after the clause expires. It changes nothing accept write now, if we pay 63 mil and agree personal terms they have to sell.

They wont because they want more money that is why.. In all the quotes by ADL he said 63m nothing less.. Even goes back to him stating that if cavani waits until the clause is over he is not a man.. ADL knows his position is weakened if no one pays the clause because it forces him to get less for a player he currently values so high..

[Hutcho 8,443]

They wont because they want more money that is why.. In all the quotes by ADL he said 63m nothing less.. Even goes back to him stating that if cavani waits until the clause is over he is not a man.. ADL knows his position is weakened if no one pays the clause because it forces him to get less for a player he currently values so high..

Again. Nothing changes. If he isn't gonna sell for 50 mil it doesn't matter if there is a 63 mil clause there or not. Not in this window.

Everyone knows we can afford it. So they have no reason to suddenly lower their asking price. If we don't pay the clause we don't get him. If the clause isn't there, we would still have to pay around that figure. Maybe if we wait until deadline day, there may be some wiggle room, because it would be the last possible chance. But even if that is the case he won't go for much less than the release clause in this window.

[1chelsea 864]

Proving points again?? Sick sick sick

Sent from my iPhone using Genjutsu

[bluesman2610 1,418]

Again. Nothing changes. If he isn't gonna sell for 50 mil it doesn't matter if there is a 63 mil clause there or not. Not in this window.

Everyone knows we can afford it. So they have no reason to suddenly lower their asking price. If we don't pay the clause we don't get him. If the clause isn't there, we would still have to pay around that figure. Maybe if we wait until deadline day, there may be some wiggle room, because it would be the last possible chance. But even if that is the case he won't go for much less than the release clause in this window.

ADL has already blocked the players move away by demanding nothing but release.. has already disrespected him by saying he is not a man if he waits until clause is gone not helping him get as much money for him as possible.. if after the clause expires he holds firm he will upset the player and you don't upset the man who gets 43% of your team offense.. he will be forced to reduce fee this is what teams around the world do.. Look at the modric saga no one would pay the 50m for him he goes 33m- 17m less than the asking price

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

So that Italian guy says Chelsea can't afford Cavani but Roman can? Christ he is hilarious, he does know Roman owns Chelsea right? Little bit of news for you Italian guy, we just signed a £300m sponsorship deal, so if we wanted we could quite easily slap 63m on ADL desk, but why do that when Cavani and ADL are due to meet apparently and Cavani could easily hand in a transfer request therefore forcing ADL hand.