Jump to content

Josh McEachran


Term-X
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes it's only preseason and yes it's only for fitness. But I couldn't help but wonder today, why in the hell are we sending this guy out on loan but keeping Van Ginkel who looked like he was struggling with some basic passes?!

I was thinking exactly that! Josh was passing into pockets of space with ease whilst MvG was struggling to go forward.

That's the thing I love about Joshy's game is that he always looks to go forward with fast and decisive passing that unlocks doors and turns defences inside and out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not saying start him in a Champions League semi final at the Allianz Arena, but he could be useful against team's like Hull especially who will park the jumbo jet infront of their goal.

But is that really going to help him develop? Just playing him when it's the perfect environment for him to succeed. How valuable is that, if at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But is that really going to help him develop? Just playing him when it's the perfect environment for him to succeed. How valuable is that, if at all?

It's all part of the development process, first give him the job of helping break down stubborn defenses, then slowly work on his defensive side, he's still 20 so there's no rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But is that really going to help him develop? Just playing him when it's the perfect environment for him to succeed. How valuable is that, if at all?

how would a loan spell help him? the last 2 definitely did not. more over the point of having a squad is to play a particular 11 which is best suited to win a match and succeed... if we can win matches by playing josh against sucky opponents, i would take that rather than see his talent being wasted in the championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all part of the development process, first give him the job of helping break down stubborn defenses, then slowly work on his defensive side, he's still 20 so there's no rush.

That's my point though, I don't think we need to give him the job of breaking down stubborn defenses because I think with his talent he can already do that. Yeah sure he can still improve here but even if he doesn't he still good enough offensively. It's the other half that he needs to work on, his technique, vision and passing is so good I'd argue that his training should be 100% strength and defense training.

At this point in his development, I'd rather see him misplace 5 passes and miss two sitters if he gets 2 tackles, 2 interceptions and a block.

His offense - 7/10

His defense - 2/10

Total - 9/20

So even if he has an amazing offensive game, which he's def capable of, the max he gets is 12/20, whereas if he even improves his defense to a 5/10, he's putting in 12/20 performances on his off days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defensive thing about josh I remember when carlo said he wanted to put him in the mid as a dm type of player.

Now I see why he wanted to do that, as josh has the ability to become some type of pirlo/alonso type of player.

But he needs the right type of loan.

Hopefully the club and Mourinho can find something interesting for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it's only preseason and yes it's only for fitness. But I couldn't help but wonder today, why in the hell are we sending this guy out on loan but keeping Van Ginkel who looked like he was struggling with some basic passes?!

shouldnt you move this post as well ... YOU brought Van into the debate ,,then decide you dont like the way the discussion was going ...

PRICELESS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shouldnt you move this post as well ... YOU brought Van into the debate ,,then decide you dont like the way the discussion was going ...

PRICELESS

I brought him in comparison with Josh and moved the posts that were only about Van Ginkel to his thread so that this one won't get derailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brought him in comparison with Josh and moved the posts that were only about Van Ginkel to his thread so that this one won't get derailed.

bullshit ...you raised the comparison so it was legitimate to discuss it; YOU criticised Van Ginkle in a thread about Josh ,,,no one mentioned

Van until you did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why are we keeping ramires then? For the defensive aspect of his game, just like MVG.

My point was more about why are we loaning Josh out. Yes he is better defensively than Josh, but Josh is a much better passer. They're not really that far apart in terms of ability and personally if I had to chose, I'd chose our academy product.

Neither of them is comparable to Ramires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you to stop moving posts if you dont like them .. perhaps you should just lock the ones you dont like???

If I don't like them? Half the posts I moved were my own!

I brought up MVG to highlight Josh's passing abilities. Some responses came about MVG only and I replied to them about MVG only as well which means they have nothing to do with this thread. So I moved them to Marco's thread because I felt that the discussion will go on for a long time. I did not want this thread to get derailed. Unfortunately you seem intent on just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I don't like them? Half the posts I moved were my own!

I brought up MVG to highlight Josh's passing abilities. Some responses came about MVG only and I replied to them about MVG only as well which means they have nothing to do with this thread. So I moved them to Marco's thread because I felt that the discussion will go on for a long time. I did not want this thread to get derailed. Unfortunately you seem intent on just that.

dont be so precious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You