Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chelsea are doubling down on their youth policy. They have taken the criticism on board but ultimately feel this approach will put them ahead of their rivals.

The oldest player Chelsea have discussed for striker is Jonathan David, 24 years old. Chelsea are sticking to their policy no matter what anyone says.

(@NizaarKinsella)

Edited by mkh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

 

Would be great if they did from our POV. They’d have one LB who can’t stay fit in Shaw and one who can’t defend in Alonso. It was a weakness of his when he was here and he’s now several years older so it surely got worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Pizy said:

I listed Lavia because I think he’s going to be an amazing player for us in the long term. At just 20 years old I’m not that concerned about his injuries last season. I’m choosing to believe it was just shit luck unlike Fofana or Reece for example who have chronic issues.

I guess I’m just much more optimistic going into the season about our defense. Call it naive hope, perhaps.

But with the personnel we have and the tactics we’ll use I think the CB’s and defenders will be much less exposed. 

Fair enough, but "amazing for us" is a tall order considering what this club has accomplished in the past. Not long ago we had prime Kante having MotM after MotM performances in CL knockout stages. We won a CL outplaying Real Madrid and then City. Nowadays we don't even play CL.
From experience here, but the idea that a player who is 20-22 and, is a good player, will automagically become much better later is simply wrong.

I'm probably with you on D, and am more worried about the attack esp our dependency on Nkunku remaining fit.
On the other hand, Maresca demands different characteristics from his D players, I also fail to see that in our group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

Fair enough, but "amazing for us" is a tall order considering what this club has accomplished in the past. Not long ago we had prime Kante having MotM after MotM performances in CL knockout stages. We won a CL outplaying Real Madrid and then City. Nowadays we don't even play CL.
From experience here, but the idea that a player who is 20-22 and, is a good player, will automagically become much better later is simply wrong.

I'm probably with you on D, and am more worried about the attack esp our dependency on Nkunku remaining fit.
On the other hand, Maresca demands different characteristics from his D players, I also fail to see that in our group.

There’s a reason Klopp, Arteta, and ourselves all wanted him and why City didn’t want to sell him for under £50m. He’s a super talent in a position that everyone is desperate to find a top player in. That we spent £50m on him after already spending mega money in midfield says how much we rate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pizy said:

There’s a reason Klopp, Arteta, and ourselves all wanted him and why City didn’t want to sell him for under £50m. He’s a super talent in a position that everyone is desperate to find a top player in. That we spent £50m on him after already spending mega money in midfield says how much we rate him.

Don't get me wrong, I haven't seen enough of him (Lavia), so I trust the multiple opinions stating that he's a very good player.

My point is that from that "very good player" (for his age) to an elite player who gives you a competitive advantage against CL or PL powerhouses should not be taken for granted however promising a player may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, mkh said:

Chelsea are doubling down on their youth policy. They have taken the criticism on board but ultimately feel this approach will put them ahead of their rivals.

The oldest player Chelsea have discussed for striker is Jonathan David, 24 years old. Chelsea are sticking to their policy no matter what anyone says.

(@NizaarKinsella)

Ahead of our rivals? We were ahead of our rivals and comfortably the main team behind City & Liverpool (albeit more a cup team arguably).

Where we are now? It’s not great, is it? 4 managers later still unsure what this squad or team is. A squad that cost over £1 bn.  Saying that, we probably still have the same problem positions we had about 3 years ago too: GK, CB, CF.

Clearlake and the two sporting director boys have lost the plot. 

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea

  • Chelsea are ready to sell Trevoh Chalobah for £30-35m. Chelsea believe they have depth in the CB and RB position; difficult decision not to call him for US tour but plan clear. Three Premier League clubs plus clubs playing in European football have made initial contact.

  • Could Mikel Merino to Chelsea be a realistic transfer to watch out for this summer? Fabrizio Romano has the latest details in his exclusive column.

  • Cesare Casadei to Fiorentina? Reports in Italy suggest this possible move for the Chelsea midfielder.

  • Andrey Santos will return to Chelsea after spending 2024/25 season on loan with Strasbourg, no doubts. Clear plan as Chelsea senior sources deny any buy option clause included in loan move. Santos will do US tour under Enzo Maresca then travel to sign for Strasbourg again.

  • Enzo Maresca: “I don’t think there will be problems with Enzo Fernandez when he returns. There were no bad intentions, I spoke with Enzo. It’s all clear now. It’s all clarified by the player and the club, so that's it. Enzo has apologised, there’s no problem at all.”

  • Maresca on Trevoh Chalobah being left out of US tour: “It’s always sad to leave a player out... but I’m here to take decisions. We have Wes Fofana, Disasi, Tosin there. Also, we have Acheapong who’s doing fantastic.”

  • Maresca on Christopher Nkunku’s role: “Nkunku can play everywhere. He’s doing very well already. He can play number 9, winger, attacking midfielder... he can play everywhere. I see football with player able to play in several positions. I want players to develop and play in several positions.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The end has come for Trevoh Chalobah at Chelsea – this was just one battle too many

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5652657/2024/07/24/chalobah-Chelsea-battle-too-far/

Chalobah-main-scaled-e1721742985342-1024

Chelsea’s decision to move on from Trevoh Chalobah — who has been left out of the club’s pre-season tour to the United States — has been 12 months in the making.

Axel Disasi’s arrival in a deal worth £38million ($49m) from Monaco of France’s Ligue 1 last August was the first clear signal; with Wesley Fofana — a £70m signing in the summer of 2022 — already on the books, there was no need to invest heavily in another right-sided centre-back if Chalobah was in the plans of co-sporting directors Laurence Stewart and Paul Winstanley for the first-team squad.

The free-agent acquisition of Tosin Adarabioyo in June was the final blow to Chalobah’s hopes of extending his 17-year association with Chelsea, but it is easy to understand why the 25-year-old did not automatically see it that way, because proving his doubters wrong has been a recurring theme of his professional career.

Chalobah’s circuitous path to the Chelsea first team did not attract the fanfare afforded to more heralded fellow Cobham academy graduates such as Reece James, Mason Mount and Tammy Abraham. He largely flew under the radar on successive loan spells at Ipswich Town, Huddersfield Town and France’s Lorient, proving and improving himself in a variety of positions without generating headlines.

It was a surprise when Thomas Tuchel, Chelsea’s head coach at the time, gave him his big break in the 2021 UEFA Super Cup win over Villarreal, three days before he marked his Premier League debut against Crystal Palace with a brilliant goal and a highly emotional celebration at Stamford Bridge. Tuchel later lost faith in him, for reasons never fully explained, but Chalobah still started the finals of the Carabao Cup and FA Cup that season.

chalobah-new-scaled-e1721743095830-2048x

He was also a regular presence in the only positive stretch of Graham Potter’s short tenure, starting six and featuring in seven matches of a nine-game unbeaten run across all competitions that followed the Englishman’s appointment in September 2022. Caretaker replacement Frank Lampard, in an unsuccessful attempt to re-establish cohesion and commitment in a fractured dressing room, restored Chalobah to the team for the miserable final stretch of that season.

Mauricio Pochettino had ample opportunity to discard Chalobah, who was unavailable from August to February of the 2023-24 campaign due to a serious hamstring injury. Instead, he publicly pledged to involve the defender on his return to fitness and was rewarded with performances: Chelsea only lost one of the 13 matches Chalobah started between February and May — an agonising 1-0 defeat against Manchester City in the FA Cup semi-finals.

Throughout that time, Chalobah could clearly be seen embracing a leadership role, making his voice heard in the tunnel before games as well as in group huddles. Watching the team’s struggles from the sidelines convinced him Chelsea were lacking personality on the pitch and he took it upon himself to step up.

When fellow academy graduate Josh Acheampong came on to make his senior debut in the final minutes of a hotly-contested London derby against Tottenham Hotspur at Stamford Bridge in May, it was Chalobah, scorer of the first goal in a 2-0 home win that day, who helped guide him through the occasion with a combination of encouragement and motivation.

Chalobah-cele-scaled-e1721743178588-2048

The irony of Chalobah’s current situation is that Acheampong is now being cited as part of Chelsea’s rationale for leaving him out of the tour squad: the 18-year-old is regarded as an elite home-grown prospect on the right side of defence and taking him to the United States gives new head coach Enzo Maresca more time to work closely with him in training.

Fofana, Disasi and Tosin at right centre-back, James, Malo Gusto and Acheampong at right-back. Six players for two positions is more than enough to navigate the five pre-season friendlies in the U.S. and should be enough to sustain Chelsea across multiple competitions in a busy 2024-25 campaign, barring a repeat of last season’s injury crisis.

But the depth of this squad at right-sided centre-back — Chalobah’s primary position — has been largely amassed since he was given a contract extension in November 2022 that runs until the end of the 2027-28 season, with a club option to extend for a further year. That decision raised eyebrows since his existing deal was not due to expire until summer 2026. It was duly interpreted as a statement of faith in his ability to forge a long Chelsea career.

Chalobah has held onto that ambition ever since, turning down numerous offers to leave — including a £25million bid from Nottingham Forest on the final day of last summer’s transfer window — and winning the trust of every Chelsea coach he has worked with. Losing the chance to do the same with Maresca will be a source of immense frustration.

There is no transfer lined up. Chalobah has done nothing to encourage interest from other clubs this summer and, as such, a market is yet to develop. By leaving him out of their tour squad, Chelsea are seeking to create one, though the optics of effectively exiling a home-grown player on a long-term contract who wants to stay and has largely performed when given opportunities to play are not favourable.

It reinforces a sense among disaffected supporters that Chelsea’s ownership, led by Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly, view Cobham graduates primarily as an easy source of profit to help offset a recruitment strategy that has so far failed to maintain the club’s high modern standards on the pitch. Some argue the treatment of Chalobah, Conor Gallagher and others underlines that the academy is for sale — an academy that is in the midst of an unsettling, monumental transformation following the departures of Neil Bath and Jim Fraser this summer.

Chalobah-poch-e1721743477212.jpg

This narrative is disputed by the club’s leadership, who point to James, Levi Colwill and others as proof that elite academy talent will always be prized. Chalobah is simply not viewed as being in that tier, and Stewart and Winstanley were not appointed to be influenced by emotion or sentimentality in their squad planning.

Chalobah cannot be sold anywhere against his wishes, and he will take his time to assess his options. He will have suitors — though Chelsea sending such a clear signal that he is surplus to requirements is unlikely to boost his transfer value. He is unquestionably a good Premier League player, a popular team-mate and a model professional, at the very least the type of footballer that most top-flight clubs in England and Europe want in their squads.

Chelsea are just no longer among them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You