Chelsea Transfers

[Mário César 1,232]

no way we will get maguire

and what about de gea for 2 years?

[Pizy 18,852]

2 hours ago, YorkshireBlue said:

I think you have been used to the previous 2 windows, when transfer news was leaking out of the club like water in a siv, that seems to have been sorted and now we hear hardly anything, which is a joy tbh.

Ehh. We’ve gotten leaked and briefs about every one of these 50 kids we’ve signed ahead of time. We’ve gotten clear briefs from within the club about Mount, Havertz, Kova, and really all of the players we’ve sold.

It’s clear there are still people within the club feeding info to trusted journalists. It’s just that this Caicedo deal we have no clue what’s actually going on. 

[Tomo 21,751]

1 hour ago, Mário César said:

no way we will get maguire

and what about de gea for 2 years?

Absolutely not. The present day version is worse than Kepa and even the prime version was overrated.

If we want a stop gap for a year or two go get Keylor Navas.

Edited July 17, 2023 by Tomo

[Vesper 30,091]

If we buy slabhead I am done with the club until he leaves

absolute deal breaker

the line gets drawn here

[Vesper 30,091]

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

See the Maguire links are back.

I am sorry but if we even entertain the idea of signing Maguire, the whole footballing infrastructure put in place, all these guys, all fucking stupid. Absolutely insane. Not that they’ve covered themselves in glory anyway barring Enzo, Badiashile and Nkunku but Maguire would be one of the stupidest transfers this window.

He’s just been stripped of United captaincy and will be getting pushed out there - if he’s not good enough for Man United, he certainly isn’t good enough for us, 12th place finish last or not. I mean they were playing that clown Lindelof ahead of him. Lindelof….

fuck that fuck

[Pizy 18,852]

Don’t think we’d take Maguire for free. It’s actually laughable that someone would even throw our name out there when we’re clearly already we’ll set at CB.

[NikkiCFC 8,285]

After Mount and Onana deals done United will go for Hojlund now. 

[Tomo 21,751]

2 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

See the Maguire links are back.

I am sorry but if we even entertain the idea of signing Maguire, the whole footballing infrastructure put in place, all these guys, all fucking stupid. Absolutely insane. Not that they’ve covered themselves in glory anyway barring Enzo, Badiashile and Nkunku but Maguire would be one of the stupidest transfers this window.

He’s just been stripped of United captaincy and will be getting pushed out there - if he’s not good enough for Man United, he certainly isn’t good enough for us, 12th place finish last season or not. I mean they were playing that clown Lindelof ahead of him. Lindelof….

 

42 minutes ago, Vesper said:

If we buy slabhead I am done with the club until he leaves

absolute deal breaker

the line gets drawn here

I think you've both been baited by whoever the hell has made that story.

Going after Maguire makes little sense even if he was good, we've got too many players in that area of the pitch.

[lucio 5,418]

Why are we signing forwards who score 3 times in 95 games in a poverty league ? 

[dimmas 130]

Even a youth striker as promising as DD Fonfana cannot get a sniff at our first team, like he wasted his own potential by coming here at a very young age.

Personally, I am really excited by his skillset; he is fast, strong, technically decent on the ball, and probably still could be improve. And he has already shown great promise at the youth level.

It's hard to believe that both Potter and Lampard preferred to give numerous cameo appearances to Aubameyang rather than to Fonfana. In some games, I even preferred him to play than Havertz, who often appears invisible as a striker or false nine, with awkward and poor displays leading our front line.

And for sure, Fonfana still has a lot of time ahead of him, but it could be said that his chances here will likely be determined by this upcoming loan. It will decide whether he can make it or not. 🥲

Edited July 17, 2023 by dimmas

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

1 hour ago, Tomo said:

 

I think you've both been baited by whoever the hell has made that story.

Going after Maguire makes little sense even if he was good, we've got too many players in that area of the pitch.

I hope so but we were also linked in January also. Two windows too many to be linked to him.

If there is any genuine interest I will be blown away.

[robsblubot 3,595]

11 minutes ago, dimmas said:

And even youth striker as promising as DD Fonfana cannot getting sniff to our first team. Like wasted his own potential by coming here in a very young age.

Maybe he plays like shit in training? Maybe he ain't good enough?

Chelsea, and esp Chelsea in the PL, is not the place to develop skills.

Edited July 17, 2023 by robsblubot

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

4 hours ago, Pizy said:

Ehh. We’ve gotten leaked and briefs about every one of these 50 kids we’ve signed ahead of time. We’ve gotten clear briefs from within the club about Mount, Havertz, Kova, and really all of the players we’ve sold.

It’s clear there are still people within the club feeding info to trusted journalists. It’s just that this Caicedo deal we have no clue what’s actually going on. 

Hardly, this window we get told we interested, then get told when it's done, there is nowhere near the amount of info coming out the club.

[lucio 5,418]

4 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Hardly, this window we get told we interested, then get told when it's done, there is nowhere near the amount of info coming out the club.

Because the club is doing fuckall besides signing 17 year olds 

[YorkshireBlue 3,264]

1 hour ago, lucio said:

Because the club is doing fuckall besides signing 17 year olds 

Club can't win clearly, last window these leaks need to stop, this window leaks stop, now your saying the clubs doing fuck all, same every window, your like spoilt kids it's fucking embarrassing.

Edited July 17, 2023 by YorkshireBlue