Chelsea Transfers

[mkh 559]

I'm not mad at all, just a bit disappointed that it ended like this.
I was looking forward to Caicedo, but certainly not for 100-110 million pounds! That's 116-127.5 million euros no thanks and fuck you Brighton.

And those who say we should have paid the 100 million pounds weeks ago no otherwise everyone can come and say so much and we just pay it like last summer where everyone complained looking back Cucurella,Sterling,Auba,Kouli,W.Fofana ......

There will be no Barella or Tchouameni either, they will stay at their clubs.

I would be happy about one of these players for the DM:

-Lucas Gourna-Douath
-Mohamed Camara
-Andre
-Arthur Vermeeren
 

[whats happening 1,612]

all summer everyone was saying 90-100m for caicedo is madness now liverpool bids 110m and again everyone is outraged that we did not bid that much.

110m pounds is fucking crazy money for a dmc.

i would rather pay 50m pounds for lavia than 110m for caicedo.

 

in the end, what a fucking embarrassing work from our board.

[TheHulk 2,401]

Just now, whats happening said:

all summer everyone was saying 90-100m for caicedo is madness now liverpool bids 110m and again everyone is outraged that we did not bid that much.

110m pounds is fucking crazy money for a dmc.

i would rather pay 50m pounds for lavia than 110m for caicedo.

 

in the end, what a fucking embarrassing work from our board.

The problem is we could've got him for 100M for the last 2 months fairly easy and avoid all this frustration.

[chelsea_4_eva 1,180]

£110M that is a LOT of money... even more than Enzo.. who we bought not even a year ago, people seem to forget that.. Yes it was a bit frustrating that we were chasing him for months only to lose out, but who would have guessed that somebody would pay more than £90M for him. The board was just trying to get their money's worth and I can see why they choose to hold off on the £100M bid, tbh for me I would have not even got past the £85M mark as I thought that that was a fair and realistic price for him. Fair play to Brighton they got their price. We move on.

[whats happening 1,612]

2 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

The problem is we could've got him for 100M for the last 2 months fairly easy and avoid all this frustration.

 

ideally we should have bid 50m for lavia 2 months ago... 

[TheHulk 2,401]

Just now, whats happening said:

 

ideally we should have bid 50m for lavia 2 months ago... 

Hope we clinch that deal today, his consistency is nowhere near Caicedo but can develop. With a bit of luck maybe we finish Top 5.

[Pizy 18,847]

1 minute ago, whats happening said:

all summer everyone was saying 90-100m for caicedo is madness now liverpool bids 110m and again everyone is outraged that we did not bid that much.

110m pounds is fucking crazy money for a dmc.

i would rather pay 50m pounds for lavia than 110m for caicedo.

 

in the end, what a fucking embarrassing work from our board.

The embarrassment isn’t just that we lost out at the end. It’s that we FINALLY bid what Brighton wanted once it was too late.

He’d be a Chelsea player weeks ago before preseason even started if we bid this £100m.

If reports are to be believed, this is now the FOURTH time since the Boehly era started that we’ve made a massive bid for a player once it’s too late.
 

-We bid £50m for Lavia right at the deadline last summer.

-We bid for Gabriel Jesus once he had already given his word to Arteta.

-I believe it was Ornstein who said we put in a last second bid for Mac Allister after he had already agreed with Liverpool.

-And now Caicedo

The only one of these last second scrambles we’ve won is Mudryk. And that was only because he wasn’t of utmost importance for Arse but more of a luxury signing. 

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

Another year where our midfield is significantly weaker than our rivals. 

[TheHulk 2,401]

 

[TheHulk 2,401]

 

[NikkiCFC 8,285]

Gotta admit, it's special to spend 800m in a year and your squad is nowhere near top4 level. 

[TheHulk 2,401]

1 minute ago, NikkiCFC said:

Gotta admit, it's special to spend 800m in a year and your squad is nowhere near top4 level. 

But some here saying we had a great summer..

[NikkiCFC 8,285]

And what happened with our 48m bid for Lavia? Is he like, nah I'd rather stay in Championship. 

[Thor 2,685]

11 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Gotta admit, it's special to spend 800m in a year and your squad is nowhere near top4 level. 

What’s our net spend?

 

We got rid of more trash than any team has in one window 

[Thor 2,685]

13 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Gotta admit, it's special to spend 800m in a year and your squad is nowhere near top4 level. 

Just checked.  Net spend has us 3rd last in the league. 

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

12 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

And what happened with our 48m bid for Lavia? Is he like, nah I'd rather stay in Championship. 

Honestly hope he does just to give Winstanley the finger. 

[TheHulk 2,401]

4 minutes ago, Thor said:

What’s our net spend?

 

We got rid of more trash than any team has in one window 

We've spend 810m and got 310m and the squad looks filled only with wildcards who might or won't. There is hardly anyone this summer you can point a finger at and say yeah he will be top class for sure. Maybe Levi but he was our own.

Edited August 11, 2023 by TheHulk

[Strike 7,474]

17 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

 

Not even a comparison. With the directors it is just Ugarte and Caicedo and there are reasonable arguments for not paying so much for Ugarte. 

There were the failed bids for Raphinha, De Ligt, Kounde, Lavia, Jesus and not to mention the signings - Cucurella, Koulibaly, Aubameyang, Fofana,