Chelsea Transfers

[Jase 43,479]

59 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Thank you, that encourages me.

The other thing which encourages me is that, even taking the injury into account, there were times when Sancho was above Pulli in the BVB pecking order and I like Pulli more than I was expecting to. On the other hand, many of Sancho's YouTubes haven't impressed me. I like some of his passing in and around the box, a big need of ours in my opinion, but his dribbling sometimes looks loose, and there are times when I feel he's trying too hard with some of the flashy tricks he tries.

A word of caution on Sancho is that he might not score or provide an assist as regularly as now because the defending in the Premier League won't be as generous as it is in the Bundesliga. 

[killer1257 3,282]

A word of caution on Sancho is that he might not score or provide an assist as regularly as now because the defending in the Premier League won't be as generous as it is in the Bundesliga. 

That can also be said for Werner.



Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

[Jase 43,479]

2 hours ago, killer1257 said:

That can also be said for Werner.



Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk
 

HOW DARE YOU SPEAK ABOUT MY BOY LIKE THAT?!

[milka 3,308]

 

[Jase 43,479]

 

[Jase 43,479]

 

[Special Juan 27,104]

Monitor FC

[killer1257 3,282]

 

Just get Boga and Ziyech and I will be a happy man during the summer

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

[Nicco 927]

2 hours ago, Jason said:

 

What does it say about Sancho, I can't read the whole article.

[Blues Forever 1,232]

6 hours ago, Nicco said:

What does it say about Sancho, I can't read the whole article.

 

[Jase 43,479]

3 hours ago, Blues Forever said:

 

I understand the whole budgeting the spending thing but buying the cheaper but less good option and buying the more expensive but not necessarily good option is VERY Chelsea, isn't it? 

[Styl1994 188]

6 minutes ago, Jason said:

I understand the whole budgeting the spending thing but buying the cheaper but less good option and buying the more expensive but not necessarily good option is VERY Chelsea, isn't it? 

This seems like the journalists opinion not fact.

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Styl1994 said:

This seems like the journalists opinion not fact.

But this is Chelsea we're talking about. It will not be surprising at all if, say, the board decide to buy Ziyech instead of Sancho because he is cheaper despite not being as good as the latter.

[Styl1994 188]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

But this is Chelsea we're talking about. It will not be surprising at all if, say, the board decide to buy Ziyech instead of Sancho because he is cheaper despite not being as good as the latter.

Us wanting Ziyech in January sounds like BS too think they just want news expect more of this until end of the season imo.

[Superblue 6,331]

Saw earlier an article that Charlie Nicholas did and whilst I'm not really a fan of him on Soccer Saturday (his embarrassing Arsenal bias probably doesn't help that opinion of him!), it was interesting that he highly rates Edouard at Celtic and thinks he could be a real good striker in the Premier League. He name dropped Chelsea and United as teams he could potentially see him moving too and being a great signing because we were both linked with Dembele (who of course was at Celtic too before Lyon) and Nicholas thinks Edouard is the better player, at least based on time at Celtic and has the higher ceiling.

Would likely be half the price too. I don't know if anyone has any thoughts on this who watch Scottish football more often?

[Jase 43,479]

Err...

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Jason said:

Err...

Here's the article...

 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

Mike Verweij is tier 1 journo for Ajax, so in the end we choose Ziyech over Sancho.