Fernando 6,725 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 11 minutes ago, Jase said: I hope you remember that we still have Barkley in the books and have been struggling him to get rid of him. The problem has been constant change managers. Had we stuck with Conte for a while we long gotten rid of those duds. If we stick with Tuchel we can get rid of them and get players that fit the profile. I still think we did great with Lampard and improve on Tuchel. Tuchel has a slowdown but it's nothing that can be fixed with another season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,483 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 our wingers are purely shit i don't be against dembele signing for almost free paid mkh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,090 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 39 minutes ago, Jase said: We paid big for Pulisic, who wasn't even close to a guarantee to begin with and we're surprised by the current situation? Moreover, even if Dembele is on the cheap side, I find it weird people want an injury prone player when the same people always complain about Pulisic being injury prone (even though he hasn't had a notable injury "caused" by himself in a long time). If you're paying £54m for a player, I'd expect them to hit more than 11 goals in a season. Players can get past injury issues when their young, well managed & have the right fitness routine in place. Also, keep in mind that he did play 34 games for Barcelona last season, not 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,721 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Jase said: Doesn't guarantee he'll be a success and not to mention, there's his very dodgy injury record. We have nearly a whole squad that's injury prone. And then we add another injury prone player. Can't make this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,949 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 A London club that doesn't want their transfer business know eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 31,103 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 6 minutes ago, Pizy said: True. 18 minutes ago, Jase said: I hope you remember that we still have Barkley in the books and have been struggling him to get rid of him. ship him to the headchopper-owned Geordies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 2 minutes ago, LAM09 said: If you're paying £54m for a player, I'd expect them to hit more than 11 goals in a season. Players can get past injury issues when their young, well managed & have the right fitness routine in place. Also, keep in mind that he did play 34 games for Barcelona last season, not 5. Pulisic played 43 games last season and people still call him injury prone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,090 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 7 minutes ago, Jase said: Pulisic played 43 games last season and people still call him injury prone. It's a narrative people seem to run with based on his past. Not sure why. Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoroccanBlue 5,399 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, LAM09 said: It's a narrative people seem to run with based on his past. Not sure why. Because he has an injury record worse than Robben, who was labeled injury prone... Robben - 3 seasons. 19 Games missed, 110 days injured. Pulisic - 2.5 seasons. 45 games missed, 335 days injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,090 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 Just now, MoroccanBlue said: Because he has an injury record worse than Robben, who was labeled injury prone... Robben - 3 seasons. 19 Games missed, 110 days injured. Pulisic - 2.5 seasons. 45 games missed, 335 days injured. I'm not disputing that, but that's in the past, as I stated. He's been available for most games in the last season & a half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoroccanBlue 5,399 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 1 minute ago, LAM09 said: I'm not disputing that, but that's in the past, as I stated. He's been available for most games in the last season & a half. Right but until this bloke can go a full season without 3 or 4 injuries that are a direct result of muscular imbalances vs direct contact, he'll always have that label. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,279 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 We haven’t even actually been linked with Dembele by a reliable outlet anyways so all this talk is pointless. He’ll go to whoever present Barca with the highest offer and I can’t see that being us. He’s more likely to go to someone like Newcastle or a club like that who want to make a splash. They need to show prospective targets that they can attract big names. West Ham would be another. We should wait until the summer and target Raphinha from Leeds if we want a new wide attacker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 31,103 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 2 minutes ago, Jase said: Pulisic played 43 games last season and people still call him injury prone. now come on do not gaslight m8 We Hate Scouse 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 31,103 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 16 minutes ago, LAM09 said: I'm not disputing that, but that's in the past, as I stated. He's been available for most games in the last season & a half. that is simply not true, come on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 31,103 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 I cannot believe that some here are trying to sell the bollocks that Pulisic is not injury prone over the course of his career 😜 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,090 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 24 minutes ago, Vesper said: that is simply not true, come on I haven't looked into in-depth, just going off what @Jase has reiterated in multiple threads. Maybe I'm wrong to do so. 😅 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 31,103 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 29 minutes ago, LAM09 said: I haven't looked into in-depth, just going off what @Jase has reiterated in multiple threads. Maybe I'm wrong to do so. 😅 I posted an extensive list (quelle surprise, lol) of his injuries LAM09 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,279 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 Just saw Dembele has personally rubbished claims he wants to leave and all but confirmed that the club hierarchy is trying to force him out by talking shit about him to the press. They’re desperate to get his wages off their books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoroccanBlue 5,399 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 13 minutes ago, Pizy said: They’re desperate to get his wages off their books. You'd think we would of learned from Saul... But I agree, I don't believe we are interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,949 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 Sevilla will allow Carlos to leave' Sky Sports' Kaveh Solhekol on the Transfer Show: "The latest we are getting on Diego Carlos is that Sevilla want to keep him for their game this weekend [against Celta Vigo] but after that game, the expectation is that Sevilla will do a deal and then it's up to the player where he wants to go. "They have had an offer from Newcastle and they have been in the driving seat for the past couple of days, but there is also another Premier League club from London who have made an offer of around £30m for him. "It's then up to Carlos where he wants to go. If you try to work out who this club in London is, my information is that it's not West Ham. "David Ornstein at The Athletic says it's not Arsenal, so that really leaves Chelsea and Tottenham. I'm not in a position to say which club it is, but I know that Spurs have a long interest in the player." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now