Chelsea Transfers

[OhForAGreavsie 5,890]

2 hours ago, Pizy said:

Guess I’ll remain one of the few who think KDH is a good signing and a clear as day upgrade on Gallagher. Has the same work rate and tenacity that CG does but is miles better using the ball. 

For me he is very Kovacic-like in that he’s highly press resistant, an awesome carrier of the ball, and gets stuck in when needed. But unlike Kova, KDH has actually shown to be highly decisive in the final third.

My own opinion on Connor is unchanged since I formed it when he was a youth team player but I have to admit that he has done much better than I thought he would when I said back then that I did not think he was Chelsea level. (Mind you our level has dropped a fair bit since then.)

There is no way KDH can match Connor's love for the club but if he is, in effect, to replace Connor in the squad he will have to offer huge effort, energy, and commitment. After that we'll see.

[TheHulk 1,847]

Maresca better have a very good game plan and tactics because so far he is pushing for his championship player and giving second chances to plumbers like Sanchez.

[TheHulk 1,847]

 

[TheHulk 1,847]

 

[NikkiCFC 7,925]

Add Chalobah, Broja and maybe Gallagher. 

[Magic Lamps 11,649]

53 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

 

22m add ons already included for Hutch is tragic. We would be paying 50m+ if it was the other way round. But I have long lost all hope we will ever have a smart transfer strategy under this ownership. Kieran Mehsbury Hall who is older and has worse PL stats than Conor...

Carney, ok he might be perma damaged after 2 big  and 4 smaller injuries but could have been a decent squad player who looked quality whenever he stepped onto the pitch. Also one of the few who can play midfield and winger as a right footer, still only 20

[TheHulk 1,847]

2 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

22m add ons already included for Hutch is tragic. We would be paying 50m+ if it was the other way round. But I have long lost all hope we will ever have a smart transfer strategy under this ownership. Kieran Mehsbury Hall who is older and has worse PL stats than Conor...

Carney, ok he might be perma damaged after 2 big  and 4 smaller injuries but could have been a decent squad player who looked quality whenever he stepped onto the pitch. Also one of the few who can play midfield and winger as a right footer, still only 20

22m with addons included and Arsenal also get a percentage of this. Another crap deal from Clownlake.

 

[We Hate Scouse 10,286]

Arsenal fans seem to think it's 50% 😳

[Pizy 18,360]

I see one of our nearest rivals United are going for Ugarte and De Ligt. Two players who were hyped up as soon to be superstars and then flopped at their new clubs. People complain about us not going for “big names,” but it isn’t always necessary. I would be happy if they waste money on those two than get actual top class ones.

[YorkshireBlue 3,122]

https://youtube.com/shorts/XAvPCJbKasA?feature=shared

[LAM09 6,733]

2 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

He’d be better than KDH thats for sure.

This is a sign that the ownership and football crowd are just here to turn a profit without being competitive.

That seems to be the case with most, if not all, American owners in football. Kroneke, Gillett, etc.

[whats happening 1,525]

3 hours ago, Strike said:

Breaks lines, works well in tight spaces. Really useful player and wasn't looking for a major role in the team either. 

Fuckall roster formation. 

wasnt looking for a major role in the team...yet.

1 hour ago, We Hate Scouse said:

Arsenal fans seem to think it's 50% 😳

 

would rather let him walk for free than give half of the money to arsenal.

[Mário César 972]

 

[NikkiCFC 7,925]

Obviously both not worth anything near that but would rather drop 100m for Isak than Osimhen. David is best value by far. 

[whats happening 1,525]

buy david for 25 and buy 12 more brazilians for 75m

[Mário César 972]

34 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Obviously both not worth anything near that but would rather drop 100m for Isak than Osimhen. David is best value by far. 

without any doubt and probably would not demand a huge salary 

[Tomo 21,733]

3 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

22m add ons already included for Hutch is tragic. We would be paying 50m+ if it was the other way round. But I have long lost all hope we will ever have a smart transfer strategy under this ownership. Kieran Mehsbury Hall who is older and has worse PL stats than Conor...

Carney, ok he might be perma damaged after 2 big  and 4 smaller injuries but could have been a decent squad player who looked quality whenever he stepped onto the pitch. Also one of the few who can play midfield and winger as a right footer, still only 20

There's not a snowball in hells chance we'd drop £50m on a player who's not yet played (bar one cameo) outside of the Championship.

[Magic Lamps 11,649]

Just now, Tomo said:

There's not a snowball in hells chance we'd drop £50m on a player who's not yet played (bar one cameo) outside of the Championship.

You sure? We recently dropped 65m on a player with a  whopping 13 Brazilian league games under his belt. I wish I was as bullish on the sanity of our board as you.

Anyway, the point was, if we had shown interest in a 20y.o. palyer with 10 goals in the championship we sure af would be quoted 50m+ bc everybody knows Clownlake is clueless.