Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

70m for someone who scored 9 goals in Serie A, on par with Tammy, less than 34 yo Arnautovic. Oh my god this striker market is rotten. 

People were sad we didn't get him instead of Jackson. 

 

Jackson looks great. More money =/ better value or player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

70m for someone who scored 9 goals in Serie A, on par with Tammy, less than 34 yo Arnautovic. Oh my god this striker market is rotten. 

70m for Hojlund vs 30m for Jackson.

I’ve said here numerous times but I don’t think Hojlund looks all that impressive. Yes, he very young, but I’d have Jackson based on what we’ve seen so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

70m for Hojlund vs 30m for Jackson.

I’ve said here numerous times but I don’t think Hojlund looks all that impressive. Yes, he very young, but I’d have Jackson based on what we’ve seen so far.

At roughly a 70M€ fee Højlund will no dobut be on much larger wages than Jackson too. 

If Jackson can continue his pre-season and late 22/23 season Villarreal performances going into the new PL season we may just have discovered a real gem at a very reasonable price. Right now it's still too early to say if he can keep it up but so far the signs are looking very promising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...