Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Strike said:

He's their third choice behind Steele and Verbruggen

That sounds pretty concerning and he's not even part of the Brighton pre-season tour squad.   Steele is 32 and hardly an amazing goalkeeper. 

We should have tested out Brentford with a bid for Raya but now he is being linked with Bayern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Reddish-Blue said:

That sounds pretty concerning and he's not even part of the Brighton pre-season tour squad.   Steele is 32 and hardly an amazing goalkeeper. 

We should have tested out Brentford with a bid for Raya but now he is being linked with Bayern. 

Yup, don't understand the delay in signing a GK? The market is becoming thin now.

Any decent keeper will consider coming here even as GK 2 since they'd back themselves to dislodge Kepa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

Probably bought for cheap and loned to them afterwards. 

Perhaps, but isn't the point of owning satellite club not spending the FFP money of main club? Meanwhile Chelsea is rumored to be after Strasbourg-tier players all the time. It's also possible it's just same scouting staff, so they are "Chelsea" in media as it surely clicks better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Strike said:

 

 

Can we stop signing only kids which we will send  on loan  and possibly in 2-3 years they will be ready (some of them) . Pochettino clearly showed that he wants experience in the squad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vegetable said:

Perhaps, but isn't the point of owning satellite club not spending the FFP money of main club? Meanwhile Chelsea is rumored to be after Strasbourg-tier players all the time. It's also possible it's just same scouting staff, so they are "Chelsea" in media as it surely clicks better.

Well basically these transfers are investments for the future. If we buy him now for lets say 10m, loan him for 1-2 years, he performs well, and his value will go up. If Strasbourg would sign him now for these 10m, no way they could sell him to us for these 10m without having UEFA all over our arses. 

So basically the idea behind this is that we could get a player that is worth for example 30m for the 10 we initially paid. And then we can decide whether we wanna use him in the squad or sell him elsewhere to make some profit. 

Its nothing new really. Roman did the same with Vitesse and his famous loan army. 

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, milka said:

Can we stop signing only kids which we will send  on loan  and possibly in 2-3 years they will be ready (some of them) . Pochettino clearly showed that he wants experience in the squad.

 

So no Caicedo? Hes a kid himself with only 1 year of PL football. Angelo is far more experienced than Lavia e.g

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pizy said:

God help us if this kid is the Caicedo alternative. I’m seeing now that we’ve agreed a deal of over £20m for him and that’s pretty pricey for someone who would go straight to Strasbourg, isn’t it?

Same age as Lavia and 1/3 the price 😂

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...