Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

I disagree. We shouldn't move on to the next target in this case because Caicedo is clearly the best available option. And there's a big drop off.

If it was a case of moving on to an alternative as good as Caicedo it would make sense. 

So do we overpay or stick to our valuation ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one else fancies putting cash on the table, no reason to go beyond 75. They don't want to let him go? Fine, let him rot there. If going on USA tour is meant to "get us moving", just pull out and get them moving instead. It's still gamble of a player. We got burnt multiple times with Brighton. I see the mid-table mentality was sucessfully instilled in part of fanbase as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Vegetable said:

No one else fancies putting cash on the table, no reason to go beyond 75. They don't want to let him go? Fine, let him rot there. If going on USA tour is meant to "get us moving", just pull out and get them moving instead. It's still gamble of a player. We got burnt multiple times with Brighton. I see the mid-table mentality was sucessfully instilled in part of fanbase as well.

A lot of money for an energetic ball winner. Not unbelievable on the ball and doesn’t score goals. 
someone posted before that he could easily turn out like Ramires rather than Kanté (good player but wouldn’t break transfer records for him) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Stick to valuation. there are plenty of options to turn to later in window

Their clubs will up the price if we leave it late 

if they see the season has started and we don’t have a midfield , they’ll know we are desperate and fleece us 

vital to get the squad finalised and settled ASAP. As we have a new manager and a young team that will require that little bit of extra work to hit the ground running. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lucio said:

A lot of money for an energetic ball winner. Not unbelievable on the ball and doesn’t score goals. 
someone posted before that he could easily turn out like Ramires rather than Kanté (good player but wouldn’t break transfer records for him) 

 

If we didn’t already have a world class playmaker like Enzo I’d be very weary about paying a big fee for Caicedo. Because as you say, he isn’t the most polished midfielder on the ball. He’s pretty solid much like Kante was but not top class yet.

But since we’d have someone beside him who can pick out those pinpoint passes and control games with the ball at his feet it allows Caicedo to do what he does best without having a creative burden on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

75+5 should be fair value i feel fir caicedo

If we get cherki i feel our business will be over in terms of purchases.Muani doesnt seem like a logical answer considering we have 2 strikers of similar level (maybe slightly lower)

Need to sell lukaku, ziyech, cho, auba, ampadu and maybe even cucu now.

Would give our window a 10/10 if we pull this off

Edited by shrenshah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than Oshimen i am really impressed by kvaratskhelia basis youtube vids 🫣. So many of Oshimens goals are served on a platter by Kvara.

If newcastle get him then they will have a reall baller on their hands, pretty sure though ADL will want 200mn for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, lucio said:

 

most commenters think lavia is better . Both have just the one year of prem experience too. 

For whatever it is worth, statistically Caicedo either slightly or massively out performs Lavia in almost every single thing that can be measured. But Lavia is 2 years younger and was playing in a shit Southampton side.

I think Caicedo is the only one that can be considered a suitable heir to Kante but Lavia is a very promising player and would still be a great signing if we can't get Caicedo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pizy said:

He looked completely done and past it for multiple seasons when he left Southampton. Now he goes to Barca….wtf?

They wanted Azpi last year as well... Barca seem to sign people mostly for the vibes, if they're Spanish, and in Oriol's case he is even Catalonian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...