Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mhsc said:

If we sell Mount it has to be for 75m+ based on the market now...

He will have one more year left on contract in the summer. I think 35-40m should do it. 

Also I just checked Liverpool players salaries and cannot see them giving him more than 150k. They are way more conservative than us in that department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget selling academy players is best thing regarding FFP. Pure profit. We gonna get 20m instalment from Roma for Abraham this year. Mount, RLC and Chalobah on the way out. This is over 100m clean profit for players we don't need and are nowhere near good enough for starting 11. This can get us Enzo easily. Only thing that would worry me is would we have enough homegrown players? 3 out but Colwill, Madueke in at least so should be fine. What a tremendous business that would be! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Don't forget selling academy players is best thing regarding FFP. Pure profit. We gonna get 20m instalment from Roma for Abraham this year. Mount, RLC and Chalobah on the way out. This is over 100m clean profit for players we don't need and are nowhere near good enough for starting 11. This can get us Enzo easily. Only thing that would worry me is would we have enough homegrown players? 3 out but Colwill, Madueke in at least so should be fine. What a tremendous business that would be! 

and what you think about gallegher? we can sell him easily for at least 60M pounds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mário César said:

and what you think about gallegher? we can sell him easily for at least 60M pounds...

No, I think 35-40 also. But keep in mind that we need homegrown players. Also Conor would earn way more money than what Mount wants and is fine with squad role. Basically 4th or 5th choice in MF. So because of this we should keep him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Costa19 said:

Contrary to what i thought, there are very few rumors at the moment. The club may be done in this window.

I definitely thought there would be more of a panic/scramble for a midfielder right near the deadline. But I’m happy to see that Boehly apparently won’t be doing something stupid and buying some mediocre midfielder just to get a fresh body in. It’s smart to just wait for our primary target until the summer whether that’s Enzo, Rice, or whoever.

Seems like Gusto will be our final deal this window. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

No, I think 35-40 also. But keep in mind that we need homegrown players. Also Conor would earn way more money than what Mount wants and is fine with squad role. Basically 4th or 5th choice in MF. So because of this we should keep him. 

Why keep the worst player though? By your logic be may as well keeping Ruben and selling both Mason and Connor?

The club should keep the better player, regardless of who is willing to accept a role/not likely to play as often/whatever, which is Mount (and when I say better I mean quite considerably better and has shown he can play at a higher level). 

Can’t believe people are talking about selling Mason. Bit flabbergasted. Yes he’s had a poor season but he’s been one of our best players the last 2 or 3 seasons. 

You just want us to keep him because for about 4 years you were saying he is much better than Mount and now he’s proven he is anything but (in fact he’s not even remotely close to being on his level albeit a different type of player) but now you think we should still keep him? I don’t know what to make of that… 

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

Why keep the worst player though? By your logic be may as well keeping Ruben and selling both Mason and Connor?

The club should keep the better player, regardless of who is willing to accept a role/not likely to play as often/whatever, which is Mount (and when I say better I mean quite considerably better and has shown he can play at a higher level). 

Can’t believe people are talking about selling Mason. Bit flabbergasted. Yes he’s had a poor season but he’s been one of our best players the last 2 or 3 seasons. 

You just want us to keep him because for about 4 years you were saying he is much better than Mount and now he’s proven he is anything but (in fact he’s not even remotely close to being on his level albeit a different type of player) but now you think we should still keep him? I don’t know what to make of that… 

But would Mount accept that role? Looks like we are going to 4231 direction. He cannot play double pivot and for number 10 now we have Nkunku, Felix way superior players. 

Regarding Gallagher I feel I have been proven right. I was praising him when he just started in Championship for Charlton. Meanwhile he was POTY for mid table PL team, was in talk for team of the season in PL actually many ex players put him there last season. And was selected for World Cup. Yes he is struggling this 6 months but probably more to do with team than him. Also so far he just had 6 PL starts so jury is still out for him.

By Lamps words Mount he is very upset when not picked regularly and wants some crazy money. Reality is he has one year left on contract in the summer. Two options for the club. Give him 300k per week and regular place or cash in not to lose him on free. You are questioning many fans for wanting option number two which sounds logical. Mount at his best day is not worth anywhere near 300k yet this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

Why keep the worst player though? By your logic be may as well keeping Ruben and selling both Mason and Connor?

The club should keep the better player, regardless of who is willing to accept a role/not likely to play as often/whatever, which is Mount (and when I say better I mean quite considerably better and has shown he can play at a higher level). 

Can’t believe people are talking about selling Mason. Bit flabbergasted. Yes he’s had a poor season but he’s been one of our best players the last 2 or 3 seasons. 

You just want us to keep him because for about 4 years you were saying he is much better than Mount and now he’s proven he is anything but (in fact he’s not even remotely close to being on his level albeit a different type of player) but now you think we should still keep him? I don’t know what to make of that… 

Agreed on not selling Mount, but depends what he is asking for on a new contract. If it’s not realistic to keep him because he has outrageous demands out of sync with what we are trying to do then sadly selling him makes a lot of sense and would set us up well in FFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

Why keep the worst player though? By your logic be may as well keeping Ruben and selling both Mason and Connor?

The club should keep the better player, regardless of who is willing to accept a role/not likely to play as often/whatever, which is Mount (and when I say better I mean quite considerably better and has shown he can play at a higher level). 

Can’t believe people are talking about selling Mason. Bit flabbergasted. Yes he’s had a poor season but he’s been one of our best players the last 2 or 3 seasons. 

You just want us to keep him because for about 4 years you were saying he is much better than Mount and now he’s proven he is anything but (in fact he’s not even remotely close to being on his level albeit a different type of player) but now you think we should still keep him? I don’t know what to make of that… 

Bit weird to say that Mount is considerably better when they haven't been given the same number of opportunities at Chelsea so far.   Would be easier to judge if Gallagher was given 2 seasons to prove his worth without any pressure or competition for places. 

The interesting part is, people tend to forget Mount's previous seasons as there was nothing spectacular about them.  With the type of players we are getting now, it remains to be seen where Mount actually fits in the overall picture as we don't need passengers in the first team XI. 

As I've said before, Mount is the steady 6/10 player that managers like to keep in the lineup (because he does the basics right) but he won't win you games on his own...unlike the other English youngsters at City/Arsenal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/01/2023 at 18:22, Vegetable said:

Imagine Benfica's best player negotiating terms with us, then swearing his love to Benfica and wanting to stay and then fucking away last day of the window by handing the clause sum himself (what has to be technically done anyway); Don't know if we can be more hated, but it would surely be prime stuff to watch. Their fans would surely love it too.

They embarassed us by saying publicly how badly we dealt with them. Even if true you don't do that. So that's exactly what they deserve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Why keep the worst player though? By your logic be may as well keeping Ruben and selling both Mason and Connor?

The club should keep the better player, regardless of who is willing to accept a role/not likely to play as often/whatever, which is Mount (and when I say better I mean quite considerably better and has shown he can play at a higher level). 

Can’t believe people are talking about selling Mason. Bit flabbergasted. Yes he’s had a poor season but he’s been one of our best players the last 2 or 3 seasons. 

You just want us to keep him because for about 4 years you were saying he is much better than Mount and now he’s proven he is anything but (in fact he’s not even remotely close to being on his level albeit a different type of player) but now you think we should still keep him? I don’t know what to make of that… 

The funny thing is Gallagher is even worse than Mount in terms of technical ability. The only thing he does better is shooting the ball.

But I agree Gallagher will be more content being a squad player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Bit weird to say that Mount is considerably better when they haven't been given the same number of opportunities at Chelsea so far.   Would be easier to judge if Gallagher was given 2 seasons to prove his worth without any pressure or competition for places. 

The interesting part is, people tend to forget Mount's previous seasons as there was nothing spectacular about them.  With the type of players we are getting now, it remains to be seen where Mount actually fits in the overall picture as we don't need passengers in the first team XI. 

As I've said before, Mount is the steady 6/10 player that managers like to keep in the lineup (because he does the basics right) but he won't win you games on his own...unlike the other English youngsters at City/Arsenal. 

All I can say is based on this season, Gallagher is terrible on the ball when under pressure. Even if he's in terrible form right now, at least Mount can maneuver better than Gallagher can with the ball at his feet.

I don't know if Gallagher can improve his technical ability. These are the kind of things we used to mock Lukaku for 

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...