Chelsea Transfers

[DDA 9,691]

17 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Threw up in my mouth a bit reading Matt Law’s latest tweet. I won’t even post it because it’s cursed. 🤢🤢🤢

I’d rather ride the season out with our current lot than sign the two he mentions.

Comon man I don't have Twitter

[Pizy 18,419]

Just now, ZAPHOD2319 said:

With who we currently have and who is coming, there is no room for Gordon, and the other mentioned, I would keep Jorginho on the decline first.

Yeah, Onana at least makes some sense as he’s the type of player we need. Don’t think he’s nearly Chelsea quality, though. The Gordon ship should have LONG since sailed. It would’ve been a poor signing (that I actually reluctantly thought would be decent at the time) in the summer but now makes less than zero sense. We’ve just signed two vastly superior wingers and I wouldn’t even have him over any of the underperforming ones we already had.

Hopefully we don’t panic at the deadline and sign some average jokers who aren’t anywhere near the required standard.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,519]

 

[ZAPHOD2319 4,519]

 

[Pizy 18,419]

4 minutes ago, DDA said:

Comon man I don't have Twitter

Says that we’re still interested in Anthony Gordon and also now Onana. Perhaps try to take advantage of Everton’s financial and on pitch turmoil. 
 

 

[ZAPHOD2319 4,519]

One thing about this transfer window that gives me hope is that we are looking at absolute ballers!! Even with us in 10th, they are still wanting to come. I would love to know the "project pitch" they are giving these guys.

[DDA 9,691]

16 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Says that we’re still interested in Anthony Gordon and also now Onana. Perhaps try to take advantage of Everton’s financial and on pitch turmoil. 
 

 

You know how to ruin a man's day. 

[Pizy 18,419]

1 minute ago, DDA said:

You know how to ruin a man's day. 

Seriously, where would Gordon even play? Even if we sold Pulisic and Ziyech we’d still have Sterling, Mudryk, Madueke, and CHO on our books. I’d rather bring CHO back than spend silly money on Gordon. 
 

Even the idea that he could be turned into a wingback makes no sense as we’re after Gusto who is a natural at the position and is way better than Gordon.

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

shite source but anyway

 

[Costa19 858]

5 minutes ago, ulsterchelsea said:

shite source but anyway

 

Lol he is a fraud. 
Last time he backed his friend who said it was 100% done.

[Hamilton 2,120]

Still, Onana is only 21, could use someone with his strength en power, would give us options. Not our lvl yet, but has potential imo

[Pizy 18,419]

This is pathetic 🤣🤣🤣 A smart business group finds a clever way of using the established rules to their advantage, a bunch of rival clubs around Europe who weren’t savvy enough to think of it themselves complain to UEFA that Chelsea are ruining everything, and now UEFA is changing the rules.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,519]

 

[Costa19 858]

6 minutes ago, Pizy said:

This is pathetic 🤣🤣🤣 A smart business group finds a clever way of using the established rules to their advantage, a bunch of rival clubs around Europe who weren’t savvy enough to think of it themselves complain to UEFA that Chelsea are ruining everything, and now UEFA is changing the rules.

• Basically, a contract can be longer than 5 years, but the amortisation will only be applied to the first 5 years.
  • Example: if this was applied to Mudryk's transfer, then given the €100m total fee, the amortisation will be €20m/year instead of ~€11.76m/year
• Other clubs raised concerns over Chelsea's transfer activity.
• This new policy will be established before the 2023 summer transfer window.
• Reminder: FIFA restricts contract lengths to a max. of 5 years except if a country's laws allow for longer contracts
  • England has no contract length restrictions.
• Existing players with contracts longer than 5 years will not be affected by this ruling.
  • Only players acquired from summer 2023 onwards will be affected.

OK guys and girls fasten your seatbelts because we gotta finish some businesses this january before the new rules get established in the summer 😎

Maybe this is the reason Gusto & Enzo (sounds like a fecking cartoon lol) rumours kicked off today? 
 

And to UEFA and everyone else…. 🖕

[DDA 9,691]

20 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

 

Great signing. Very pleased with this one.

[Gundalf 804]

2 minutes ago, DDA said:

Great signing. Very pleased with this one.

No signing yet. Lyon rejected the first bid. 

[Gundalf 804]

Also: where are the people that said we dont have a pull with Potter and our current position??? 😂

[Gundalf 804]

13 minutes ago, Costa19 said:

• Basically, a contract can be longer than 5 years, but the amortisation will only be applied to the first 5 years.
  • Example: if this was applied to Mudryk's transfer, then given the €100m total fee, the amortisation will be €20m/year instead of ~€11.76m/year
• Other clubs raised concerns over Chelsea's transfer activity.
• This new policy will be established before the 2023 summer transfer window.
• Reminder: FIFA restricts contract lengths to a max. of 5 years except if a country's laws allow for longer contracts
  • England has no contract length restrictions.
• Existing players with contracts longer than 5 years will not be affected by this ruling.
  • Only players acquired from summer 2023 onwards will be affected.

OK guys and girls fasten your seatbelts because we gotta finish some businesses this january before the new rules get established in the summer 😎

Maybe this is the reason Gusto & Enzo (sounds like a fecking cartoon lol) rumours kicked off today? 
 

And to UEFA and everyone else…. 🖕

Actually thats pretty good. Im sure a lot of clubs would have copied us from now on. So if UEFA bans this now just means we took advantage of sth other clubs cant do in the future.