Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah us negotiating with Benfica… its more than likely going to be either pay the release clause or fuck off. As it always was  when we tried last time and usually is with Portuguese clubs.

I don’t see us offering say £90-100m over the spread of a long contract. And even if we did, are they really going to be inclined to accept it when the release clause is still £106m? After the initial pursuit at the beginning of the month? It makes no sense for them to take a lesser deal or a deal thats structured in a way to make it more beneficial for us than for them. Even more so when they know they will get that £106m release clause in the summer as more clubs will be better placed to make such moves.

I think for sure Real Madrid, Man City, Liverpool will all be in the market for a statement signing in the summer and I think MFers such as Bellingham and Enzo will top most lists.

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben Jacobs saying we still hope Benfica will soften on our approach. We are going to test them again, he still wants the move but their stance is release clause or nothing. Big bids for both Caicedo and Enzo can't be ruled outand we don't consider this window closed after the Mudryk signing. Chelsea haven't given up on either Enzo or Caicedo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Ben Jacobs saying we still hope Benfica will soften on our approach. We are going to test them again, he still wants the move but their stance is release clause or nothing. Big bids for both Caicedo and Enzo can't be ruled outand we don't consider this window closed after the Mudryk signing. Chelsea haven't given up on either Enzo or Caicedo

Problem is.. why would they ”soften” this late in the window? 

I have a hard time beliveing they will just ”Oh we changed our mind. We will gladly accept a lesser fee than we demanded before now when there is only a couple of days left” 

Edited by Costa19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Costa19 said:

Problem is.. why would they ”soften” this late in the window? 

I have a hard time beliveing they will just ”Oh we changed our mind. We will gladly accept a lesser fee than we demanded before now when there is only a couple of days left” 

100m is genuinely as much as they will ever get for him. 

How long is the release clause active for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Threw up in my mouth a bit reading Matt Law’s latest tweet. I won’t even post it because it’s cursed. 🤢🤢🤢

I’d rather ride the season out with our current lot than sign the two he mentions.

With who we currently have and who is coming, there is no room for Gordon, and the other mentioned, I would keep Jorginho on the decline first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Threw up in my mouth a bit reading Matt Law’s latest tweet. I won’t even post it because it’s cursed. 🤢🤢🤢

I’d rather ride the season out with our current lot than sign the two he mentions.

Comon man I don't have Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ZAPHOD2319 said:

With who we currently have and who is coming, there is no room for Gordon, and the other mentioned, I would keep Jorginho on the decline first.

Yeah, Onana at least makes some sense as he’s the type of player we need. Don’t think he’s nearly Chelsea quality, though. The Gordon ship should have LONG since sailed. It would’ve been a poor signing (that I actually reluctantly thought would be decent at the time) in the summer but now makes less than zero sense. We’ve just signed two vastly superior wingers and I wouldn’t even have him over any of the underperforming ones we already had.

Hopefully we don’t panic at the deadline and sign some average jokers who aren’t anywhere near the required standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DDA said:

You know how to ruin a man's day. 

Seriously, where would Gordon even play? Even if we sold Pulisic and Ziyech we’d still have Sterling, Mudryk, Madueke, and CHO on our books. I’d rather bring CHO back than spend silly money on Gordon. 
 

Even the idea that he could be turned into a wingback makes no sense as we’re after Gusto who is a natural at the position and is way better than Gordon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is pathetic 🤣🤣🤣 A smart business group finds a clever way of using the established rules to their advantage, a bunch of rival clubs around Europe who weren’t savvy enough to think of it themselves complain to UEFA that Chelsea are ruining everything, and now UEFA is changing the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 1 member are here!

×
×
  • Create New...