Harry Kane

[iseah100 5,612]

Think somebody needs to take off their blue tinted glasses. Bamford is a decent player but like I've said numerous times there's a huge difference in quality and there's no point sitting trying to deny there isn't. Kane will end up with 30-35 goals at the end of the season in all competitions.

How can you say that until Bamford is properly given a chance? Here he's behind a world class striker in Costa, a PL prove striker in Remy and Drogba the legend. Not to mention he is owned by one of the top 5 clubs in the world who need to win trophies and play in the CL. Harry Kane was behind Adebayor and Soldado and he plays for Spurs, who struggle to crack the top 5 of the PL and play in the Europa League.

[Reddish-Blue 2,489]

How can you say that until Bamford is properly given a chance? Here he's behind a world class striker in Costa, a PL prove striker in Remy and Drogba the legend. Not to mention he is owned by one of the top 5 clubs in the world who need to win trophies and play in the CL. Harry Kane was behind Adebayor and Soldado and he plays for Spurs, who struggle to crack the top 5 of the PL and play in the Europa League.

You make good points but at the end of the day, Bamford isn't at Kane's level

For me, Bamford is 2-3 years away from becoming a squad player at Chelsea

[Jase 43,479]

Think somebody needs to take off their blue tinted glasses. Bamford is a decent player but like I've said numerous times there's a huge difference in quality and there's no point sitting trying to deny there isn't. Kane will end up with 30-35 goals at the end of the season in all competitions.

So, just because I said you have overexaggerated the difference in quality between the two and suggested we should wait a little while longer to see if Kane is the real deal, I'm being biased here?

Such a typical excuse used just to prove others are wrong when you have nothing concrete or solid to prove you're outrightly correct.

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

So, just because I said you have overexaggerated the difference in quality between the two and suggested we should wait a little while longer to see if Kane is the real deal, I'm being biased here?

Such a typical excuse used just to prove others are wrong when you have nothing concrete or solid to prove you're outrightly correct.

Kane is playing in the PL. Bamford is playing in the Championship. If he was good enough to play in the PL, why did no team sign him on loan??? There is a huge difference, which is what I've said numerous times. I swear every time we are linked with a striker, Bamford comes up despite being years away from even being a squad player here, never mind a regular, I have more hope in Solanke than Bamford.

[Stats 7,135]

With respect to the Europa League, we know that competition is nothing much especially when you face crap oppositions in the group stage.

And you're really REALLY overexaggerating the difference between the two. Better off judging when Bamford (eventually) plays in the Premier League and going back to what I said earlier, let's see how Kane fares in the remaining months of the season and next one too. He could be the real deal or he might not.

THAT!

I am a huge fan of Bamford but right now Kane is much better of course. It is not even oan overexaggeration to say so. Kane, as other people have mentioned has speed, strength, technique, heading ability and for me is a quality all round striker. He ripped us to shreds and won the Arsenal game by himself as well. Initially I thought Kane was a player who performed in the EL only but it is quite obvious now that not just by his goal but his overall play that he has the potential to be a world class striker. He has it all. Right now Kane is on another level to Bamford.

[KingB 9]

Just mentioning that Bamford has scored goals against Man City and Liverpool this season.

[Stats 7,135]

He really isnt anything special at all, his movement is average if you compare it with guys like Costa, Higuain, Bacca and Tevez all who have excellent movement, his hold up play and link up play also isnt great, no where near as good as players like Lewnadowski, Costa, Ibrahimovic and Benzema, his all round game is pretty average, he is just going through a good run of form, something we have seen many many times from players in the PL.

Remy is a better striker then Kane as is Demba Ba, if you want to believe the hype then its up to you, but watchng him play he really doesnt look like someone who is ever going to be world class.

Sorry but that is rubbish. Kane has an excellent work rate, excellent strength, good movement, links up with play excellently, good technique, good aerial ability. And you are comparing him to players who are more or less the finished article. You obviously have not watched him if you assume is all round game is average. His all round game is excellent and that is why he is scoring goals and being a complete nuisance for defenders.

You sound more like a hater than a fan because your analysis of him does not make sense at all.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

Great player but he's a Spurs lad and probably won't ever make the move here. Can see him going to United or City though.

[Jase 43,479]

Kane is playing in the PL. Bamford is playing in the Championship. If he was good enough to play in the PL, why did no team sign him on loan???

How do you know? He could have chosen to play in the Championship, for now, because it would help him to develop rather than perhaps joining some Premier League club and wouldn't play as much. Even Kane had that issue until Pochettino lost it with Adebayor and Soldado.

There is a huge difference, which is what I've said numerous times. I swear every time we are linked with a striker, Bamford comes up despite being years away from even being a squad player here, never mind a regular, I have more hope in Solanke than Bamford.

Funny thing is, I never compared Kane and Bamford to begin with. You did. I only said there's no need to buy Kane in the future if/when the strikers we have the youth team now develop properly and feature in the first team. I mentioned Bamford because for all we know, he could be playing regularly for us in the future once he gets the opportunities in the Premier League. He's already showing he's got the talent and goals to back it up. And if it's not Bamford, it can be someone else, just like I suggested in the initial post.

[lucio 5,418]

You can get danny ings who is only 22 for £6.5m. Or pay 10x for kane. Not that I would bother with ings

[Gilvorak 3,734]

Still don't get the hype with this guy. Lukaku scored 17 goals in his debut season at WBA aged 17. 3 years later apparently he's shit and was never good.

[Tomo 21,751]

How can you say that until Bamford is properly given a chance? Here he's behind a world class striker in Costa, a PL prove striker in Remy and Drogba the legend. Not to mention he is owned by one of the top 5 clubs in the world who need to win trophies and play in the CL. Harry Kane was behind Adebayor and Soldado and he plays for Spurs, who struggle to crack the top 5 of the PL and play in the Europa League.

That's like saying how can Asombolonga be considered not as good as Costa because he hasn't had the chance.

Right now Kane is widely considered the better of the two due to the fact he is scoring goals in the premier league, they aren't token goals either, 5 goals and 3 assists in 3 games against Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool isn't to be sniffed at.

Lets be honest if the boot was on the other shoe and Bamford was with us doing what Kane was doing and Kane himself was on loan in the Championship, we would laugh any attempted comparison out of the room and rightly so.

If/when Bamford starts scoring goals in the PL at a similar rate then start the comparisons, until that happens not one single person outside of Chelsea will even think of this comparison, let alone prefer the player who hasn't played a single PL game.