Jump to content

Mikel John Obi


Badboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anybody have confidence that this season a Mikel-Matic pairing can work in the big games/later UCL matches?

Last season Mikel was injured for months, and in the few games they played together (Livepool COC away) they looked very very shaky/poor.

We still haven't replaced the qualities that David Luiz offered for the 'Big Games'. (City Away 2013, Arsenal Home 2014)

only if nigeria mikel plays. a bit too passive normally to replace luiz , other than the physical factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody have confidence that this season a Mikel-Matic pairing can work in the big games/later UCL matches?

Last season Mikel was injured for months, and in the few games they played together (Livepool COC away) they looked very very shaky/poor.

We still haven't replaced the qualities that David Luiz offered for the 'Big Games'. (City Away 2013, Arsenal Home 2014)

No, it's simply too slow. Zouma-Matic would work better even if Zouma is less tactically astute in midfield, he uses his athleticism to prop things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody have confidence that this season a Mikel-Matic pairing can work in the big games/later UCL matches?

Last season Mikel was injured for months, and in the few games they played together (Livepool COC away) they looked very very shaky/poor.

We still haven't replaced the qualities that David Luiz offered for the 'Big Games'. (City Away 2013, Arsenal Home 2014)

Mikel is only used for Parking a bus!

However, it is no adventage for nowadays Chelsea to park a bus, CFC has neither solid defence nor guarantee to lead for any match!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless how you rate him, why would you keep a player with his feeble attacking numbers on the pitch when chasing a result with few minutes left.

Yeah because we were so creative without him on the pitch. Fact is we actually had a midfield out there with him on the pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah because we were so creative without him on the pitch. Fact is we actually had a midfield out there with him on the pitch.

Yes yes Mikel is now a world class player Whatever... Lol

Like I said, regardless how you rate him, his attacking stats speak for themselves. So from a strategy standpoint it's the same as adding attsckers - yes something always gotta give.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes yes Mikel is now a world class player Whatever... Lol

Like I said, regardless how you rate him, his attacking stats speak for themselves. So from a strategy standpoint it's the same as adding attsckers - yes something always gotta give.

to attack, u need to have the ball.

u can have the ball only if u win it back or the opposition conceded the ball to go on counter (which porto definitely did not do).

A.taking him out was a grave mistake.

B. taking him out and putting cesc as a DLP was a graver mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to attack, u need to have the ball.

u can have the ball only if u win it back or the opposition conceded the ball to go on counter (which porto definitely did not do).

A.taking him out was a grave mistake.

B. taking him out and putting cesc as a DLP was a graver mistake.

Mikel was subbed off when we were already losing the game so what grave mistake do you speak of?

mikel slows down play - we needed to speed it up to attack them. Possession meant nothing once we were losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mikel was subbed off when we were already losing the game so what grave mistake do you speak of?

mikel slows down play - we needed to speed it up to attack them. Possession meant nothing once we were losing.

again, to attack them, u need to first get the ball.

damn, i thought i was clear the first time itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, to attack them, u need to first get the ball.

damn, i thought i was clear the first time itself.

It's truly amazing that you keep on thinking people misunderstand or don't understand your very simple points - we are discussing football here not physics.

We simply disagree on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's truly amazing that you keep on thinking people misunderstand or don't understand your very simple points - we are discussing football here not physics.

We simply disagree on this.

u disagree that a team needs a ball to attack?

now i am just confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You