bleed_blue 136 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Whow.....so much luv to a player must be personal or may be some just know more than the best coaches in the world. Do you have memory issues?That coaches argument was countered a few pages back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetdoscar 335 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetdoscar 335 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Do you have memory issues?That coaches argument was countered a few pages back.Its you again.....you must be my shadow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Some say, Mikel is valuable, some can not see him hitting the net though.Certainly, if I remember correctly he even caused Chelsea to pay over 10- 12m to Manures. He signed for United, too.I believe, his price was 16m, then. Now, I do not mean to be disrespectful of him, but he is not worth it. The kid Van Ginkel went for 8m & I bet he will be better. Let´s see what Mikel does in America, soon. I still prefer to see him go & allocate the money for better DM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 "I would still expect us to win those games with Luiz or Mikel"Unfortunately, football does not work on how YOU think. It is played on the field and the results of last year seem to be exactly opposite to how YOU think. These variables you listed down, they average up over a period and a season is long enough. You come up with arguments like 1. "Mikel is good at defending the back four"I disagree and back my statement with the fact that we conceded 1.53 goals per game when Mikel started last season vs 0.89 goals when he did not start. Surely, I have a stronger argument.2. "Mikel lets our attacking players to concentrate on their strengths and hence benefits the team"I disagree and back my statement with the fact that we scored 1.6 goals per game when Mikel started last season vs 2.51 goals per game when he did not start.Surely, I have a stronger argument3. "Mikel played games against tougher opposition "I tell you that the average league standings of our PL opponents when Mikel started was 10.3 vs 11.5 when he did not start. That is not a big enough difference surely?4. "Mikel has superior positional sense, is strong physically"That is the most subjective thing you can say about a player. Even if I were to agree with you (which I don't), good positional awareness, physical strengths are not the end game unless you use those qualities to add to your performance on the pitch. Considering the fact that Chelsea win more games when mikel does not start.Chelsea lose fewer games when mikel does not startChelsea score more goals when mikel does not startChelsea concede fewer goals when mikel does not startHe sure as hell is not using those qualities which you think he has. You guys have not even a single solid reason, all hot air.And my counter argument to that is this: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/13977-john-mikel-obi-the-keystone/We've been through all the arguments countless times. You predicted that Jose will sell Mikel and now you predict that he will be benched. I think he will be a key player for the team just like he's been for the past four seasons. Let's wait and see if football works like I think it does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetdoscar 335 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Mikel isn't stopping chelsea from signing any DM in the world. If you must hate then hate the coaches or the board or who ever the hell buys and sells players because we have the money to sign almost any player we want and if they did not sign a DM its their fault because poor mikel knows nothing about that. This taunting makes no sense nachikethas 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Personally, I wouldn´t call it taunting. Mostly, it´s a speculation here & folks are posting their opinions, that is all.Whether he stays or not, only time will tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 And my counter argument to that is this: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/13977-john-mikel-obi-the-keystone/We've been through all the arguments countless times. You predicted that Jose will sell Mikel and now you predict that he will be benched. I think he will be a key player for the team just like he's been for the past four seasons. Let's wait and see if football works like I think it does. a few posts ago you were stating statistics were irrelevant ,,,now your main point is pages of stats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 a few posts ago you were stating statistics were irrelevant ,,,now your main point is pages of statsI said they can't be your sole argument but instead they're something you use to back a point that you've made from observations and that is exactly what that article by SeB does. Stats can be manipulated to support almost any opinion, but they can also be very insightful. Depends on how you use them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 I said they can't be your sole argument but instead they're something you use to back a point that you've made from observations and that is exactly what that article by SeB does. Stats can be manipulated to support almost any opinion, but they can also be very insightful. Depends on how you use them. Support Choulo's opinion = Very insightful.Don't support Choulo's opinion = Clearly manipulated. GhanaBoy, Joe Cool, zolayes and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleed_blue 136 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 So last seasonI OBSERVED that chelsea were performing better when Mikel did not play. I back that up with stats thatChelsea won fewer games with MikelChelsea lost more games with MikelChelsea scored fewer goals with MikelChelsea conceded more goals with MikelBut you are right, they are clearly manipulated. Regarding that article by SeB, are you this naive not to understand that our football has evolved. We no longer have Drogba upfront. Over the past two summers, we have brought in players like Mata, Oscar, Hazard. The defending with 10 men behind the ball days are over at Chelsea.That article is a complete hogwash in the present context, and frankly having read so many of your posts on this forum, I dont think you have the ability to understand this bit.and regarding Jose selling Mikel, I have always maintained that we won't get offers for Mikel and eventually that has been the case. Why would another top club take such a liability at their place. Galtasaray assistant manager, Hasan Sas denied all media reports and said they were never in for Mikel, it was just Mikel's agent talk. Similarly when he was linked to Trabzonspor, their president said the same thing. Any person with half a brain knows and understand that but I agree expecting that much from you is a tall order.and YES I agree that Mikel was a key player last year. His ABSENCE due to "injury" towards the end of the season helped us build and maintain a winning momentum that got us the third place and also the Europa league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,486 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 I personally think Jose has faith in him, and that's why we're probably not buying another midfielder.He certainly has the ability, so it'll be interesting to see how he plays under Mourinho. I think he can be a beast under the right circumstances and given the right role.This. He won't work well in a pressing game with a midfield duo looking to recycle possession forward. He works well in the old 4-3-3 where he sits in front of the back four with no much running, pressing required. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachikethas 1,154 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 DP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachikethas 1,154 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 WE HAVE NEW BACKSTREET BOY OVER HERE LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripji 16 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I think some people will run mad when they see Mikel playing week in week out under Jose.. If players are considered surplus to requirement, the are being released. If he is a liabity as one cunt suggest then he should be released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.