Jump to content

World Exclusive News


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 538
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So most members didnt want Turkish Airlines (best airline in Europe) but are ok with a tyre manufacturer from Japan LOL. OK...

What's wrong with being a tyre manufacturer from Japan? Would you say no to Bridgestone too only because they're a tyre manufacturer from Japan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im reading the same, damnit whats taking so long to announce whoever the new fucking sponsor is?!

Anyways, does this mean we will have both Qatar Airways and Yoko?

If so, that'd be brilliant..may the company willing to shell out the most $$$ win!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where have this Qatar Airways suddenly come from? Haven't seen anything about it. Id rather have Turkish airlines than them tbh, altough it obviously depends on the money involved aswell. Hopefully it will be Yokohama tho!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So most members didnt want Turkish Airlines (best airline in Europe) but are ok with a tyre manufacturer from Japan LOL. OK...

. Turkish Airlines is two words, takes up more room on the shirt, less blue.

. Yokohama sounds better than 'Japan tyres', do I need to explain how that applies to Turkish Airlines for you?

. Turkish Airlines use Liverpool's bird logo and plenty of red

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy how many of you haven't heard of them LOL Ive had their tyres on my cars multiple times lol.

In an ideal world is like to stick with Samsung (if they matched the payout) or honestly I would prefer Gazprom too.

But Yoko isn't bad, and looks like they'll be paying us a decent figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good looking logo, an excellent payout if it's anywhere near the rumoured £40m mark and not by any means controversial like City or PSG sponsors. No idea why some people are still not happy. Just because it's not some super trendy brand like Apple or Google some would have creamed their pants for doesn't mean it's not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldnt give a monkeys which corporate we're gonna prostitute across our sacred shirts for a wodge of cash.

Realise its a million pound moneyspinner, (kettering were the first in the uk with Kettering Tyres), but with billions from TV revenue, clubs dont need it and is greedy and fucking ugly imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You