Raheem Sterling

[LukakutoStamford 779]

I am. I'm not saying that he will be as good as Messi or Ronaldo, but he is definetly the best U21 player in the world, he is English and eager to leave his club. His dribbling is outstanding, he scores and assists a lot, he is agressive and energetic, I think we should definetly go for him. He has his mistakes(finishing for example) but he could improve a lot at Chelsea.

Best U21 in the world? How about no. Better off getting Ferrera-Carrasco from Monaco for 8-10.

[LAM09 7,043]

£50 million is certifiable right now. £30 million and I'd snap him up in a minute though. He's still so young and already has plenty of Premier League experience.

Hazard-Willian-Sterling would be like watching a track meet.

We would need a new finishing coach.

[Stats 7,142]

Best U21 in the world? How about no. Better off getting Ferrera-Carrasco from Monaco for 8-10.

Sterling is better than Ferrera-Carrasco. Ferrera-Carrasco will be 22 in a few months anyway and while I like him, you can not seriously tell me he is better than Sterling. Even though Sterling is younger, he still has scored much more goals. While Sterling was contributing to Liverpool's title charge in the 13/14 season, Ferrera-Carrasco was in and out of the team for Monaco and sometimes an unused sub. Not even comparable.

[Special Juan 28,133]

SSN: Man City make second bid of 40M for Sterling.....Transfer request in coming.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

overrated tit, whos runs like a tart

I suppose that's better than being an overrated tart who runs like a tit.

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

SSN: Man City make second bid of 40M for Sterling.....Transfer request in coming.

Yeah £35m+£5m add ons -- Think they'll reject that. QPR are owed 20% so they'd get about £28m-ish before any add ons come in. Bad deal considering they're demanding 50 apparently.

I think it'd take £40-45m in one go, maybe add ons taking it up close to 50 to have any chance.

[Special Juan 28,133]

Yeah £35m+£5m add ons -- Think they'll reject that. QPR are owed 20% so they'd get about £28m-ish before any add ons come in. Bad deal considering they're demanding 50 apparently.

I think it'd take £40-45m in one go, maybe add ons taking it up close to 50 to have any chance.

The price is just nothing short of madness.

[Hutcho 8,443]

Please go to city. Will laugh like crazy when they pay that for him lol.

Just don't come here.

[LondonsFinest 692]

I don't expect us to bid anything bigger than 35 mil.

Bet my house he'd do great at City.

[Unionjack 7,531]

For £50m!? They could try to get Griezman, Reus, Muller, dude from Lyon, Bellarabi, Vela, hell for £50m I'm sure they could get Alexis.

Whereas IF we do end up getting Sterling you wouldn't hear me shouting 'Get Sterling out' from my seat I do totally agree that I'd be throwing myself around MH Upper having a private party if we managed to get one from that list.

I see a report somewhere this morning we were still after Griezmann. Maybe I'll still have to donate my left dangley afterall.

[Essien19 1,415]

Hazard-Willian-Sterling

I wish we never play that. Cant say who is more frustrating finisher to watch. All have same qualities. speed, dribbling. All three are rather small.

Not a dream trio as some point out.

Do you prefer this one?

Hazard-Willian-Cuadrado

[Madmax 9,219]

Liverpool rejected £40m.

Do they ever learn? Now watch Arsenal come up with £40m + £1.

[LondonsFinest 692]

I'd love a scenario where Liverpool play hardball for him all summer, no one pays 50 mil. and they end up selling for 25 (maximum) or letting him go on a free 6-12 months later.

[Bir_CFC 3,455]

Ugh. Don't want him going to City. But 50M is way too much.

[The Skipper 20,609]

£40m rejected. Incredible.