Ainsley Harriott 2,732 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DROGBAtheGOAT 29 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 No. Not yet anywayPLEASE Respond with a list of the ones that are better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 PLEASE Respond with a list of the ones that are better.i heard bradley was better Miguelito and The Mak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouri_Matic 560 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 PLEASE Respond with a list of the ones that are better.Yaya Toure, Fernandinho, Alonso, Modric, Busquest, Bastian Sweisteigher( spelling), Javi Martinez, Gundogan, Matuidi(debatable), Pogba, Pirlo and the list goes on... Chelsea? and didierforever 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DROGBAtheGOAT 29 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 i heard bradley was betterI heard you were ignored didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Styles 9,790 Posted January 15, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted January 15, 2014 Hopefully now we'll hear less talk about the pivot. I think this was a summer move done early because Jose believes we can win the league this year. Hard to argue with that because we're well placed. AswinR, Term-X, Mouri_Matic and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 hopefully this means Fat Frank will be benched a lot more now, the terrible thing is if Ramires is scarified for Matic and Lampard continue to be selected, that WOULD BE MASSIVE MASSIVE FACEPALMRamires won't be sacrificed, but even if he is; Matic-Lampard is a much better option against lesser opponents than Lampard-Ramires ever was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouri_Matic 560 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Ramires won't be sacrificed, but even if he is; Matic-Lampard is a much better option against lesser opponents than Lampard-Ramires ever was.Obviously, we now have a CDM who can actually DEFEND, but imo Lampard contributes nothing significant anymore apart from 1-2 odd goals here and there, just not worth it compared to Ramires and what he can offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Stats 7,142 Posted January 15, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted January 15, 2014 hopefully this means Fat Frank will be benched a lot more now, the terrible thing is if Ramires is scarified for Matic and Lampard continue to be selected, that WOULD BE MASSIVE MASSIVE FACEPALMSometimes you really do chat the most amount of shit on this forum! Azpinator, Nero, NiclasCFC and 9 others 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Sometimes you really do chat the most amount of shit on this forum!How is it shit, surely everyone on this forum can see the best possibly partnership for the pivot is Matic and Ramires. Lampard has been great for us and is a legend but he is getting on a bit and just doesnt provide enough defensively. Next time try to explain the reason you disagree rather than insulting someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Obviously, we now have a CDM who can actually DEFEND, but imo Lampard contributes nothing significant anymore apart from 1-2 odd goals here and there, just not worth it compared to Ramires and what he can offer.1or 2 goals ,, OUR TOP EVER SCORER ,,,,is your name rodney cos you are a PL******** didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Obviously, we now have a CDM who can actually DEFEND, but imo Lampard contributes nothing significant anymore apart from 1-2 odd goals here and there, just not worth it compared to Ramires and what he can offer.Same can be said about Ramires, what does he offer in attack to play over Lampard? i mean no disrespect to anyone, but we don't need 2 defensive players in the pivot against most teams at Stamford Bridge.This is why Lampard is still valuable. Chelsea? and GhanaBoy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouri_Matic 560 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 1or 2 goals ,, OUR TOP EVER SCORER ,,,,is your name rodney cos you are a PL********No it is not my name. And 2nd of all, yeah back in the days where he was considered to be the best in football in his role more advanced up field, now he is not even in top 15-20 in any position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbara 15,149 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Okay people time to play armchair pundits.Bring out your best formation and all the other alternatives after that.this is part of the scout I'm writing for Chelsea Brasil right now.I think there's a chance Mourinho will interchange Ramires and Matic sides of the pitch (he does say he likes to play lefties in the right and right-footed in the left). But I think that's it. Rami as a B2B player, with more freedom, and Matic as the contention, defensive player, with the sporadic cameo in the attack (white arrows) to make use of his potent long distance shots.The other players I chose are part of the starting XI Mourinho's been choosing before Iva got injured. Not exactly a personal preference. Fernando, 1chelsea and borriske 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouri_Matic 560 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Same can be said about Ramires, what does he offer in attack to play over Lampard? i mean no disrespect to anyone, but we don't need 2 defensive players in the pivot against most teams at Stamford Bridge.This is why Lampard is still valuable.He could actually do this? Yeah Lampard is only valuable when HE DOESN'T NEED TO THINK ABOUT DEFENDING Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 He must have handed in a transfer request or threatened to do so, otherwise no way they part with him so fast without what seems like even negotiating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 No it is not my name. And 2nd of all, yeah back in the days where he was considered to be the best in football in his role more advanced up field, now he is not even in top 15-20 in any position. you are entitled to that opinion ,,BUT NO Chelsea fan ever INSULTS a true Chelsea legend in the way you have ,,, Eden2020 and The Mak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Number 6 was available, and he goes and choses Kalou's jersey. An astute signing nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Same can be said about Ramires, what does he offer in attack to play over Lampard? i mean no disrespect to anyone, but we don't need 2 defensive players in the pivot against most teams at Stamford Bridge.This is why Lampard is still valuable.When Ramires goes in attack, he draws a lot of defenders...When lampard goes in attack, he doesnt draw that many defenders.Especially, in the counter, Rambo is deadly with his speed and 1v1 ability (best on our team by far)..... Mouri_Matic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouri_Matic 560 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 you are entitled to that opinion ,,BUT NO Chelsea fan ever INSULTS a true Chelsea legend in the way you have ,,, OMG lol you thought I meant it? It was a joke, it is like calling Rooney Shrek. It is clearly not intended to insult him personally, just saying something that he has been called over the years. Sorry if you found it offensive. Chelsea? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.