shwan 3 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 finally we have some quality in DMF, so happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 He's 25. i'll take your word for it. Fifa and some internet sites have him born 8th january 1988, whilst wikipedia,tm and our official website have him 1st august 1988 so i was confused. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toli 977 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 26, turned 26 just a week ago.chelseafc is saying 25. Chelsea Legend 11 and The Skipper 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 26, turned 26 just a week ago.Wiki seems to have him down as 25... Chelsea Legend 11 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 15, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted January 15, 2014 Shame he's cup-tied but he could be what puts us over the top in the league. Even though he's cup-tied, him being available for the FA Cup and the league should allow our other midfielders to perform better in the Champions League as they'd have more rest, specifically Lampard. The Skipper, bababoom, sodasys and 8 others 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 26, turned 26 just a week ago.I think some reports say he was born August 1st, but others January 8th. 8/1 is read differently in different places I guess.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! lucio 5,418 Posted January 15, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted January 15, 2014 Hybrid Angel, sdrcfc, Blueman and 16 others 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 chelseafc is saying 25.I think some reports say he was born August 1st, but others January 8th. 8/1 is read differently in different places I guess..Wiki seems to have him down as 25...8th jan 1988 born. by my math, 26. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/jan/15/nemanja-matic-chelsea-midfield-jose-mourinho-benfica?CMP=twt_guJonathan Wilson on the signing of Matic... Term-X and Pizy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toli 977 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 8th jan 1988 born. by my math, 26.and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....ps: go over and read the redcafe comments. hilarious... didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....maybe... not sure though... espn rarely gets stuff wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,938 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 It makes me wanna jizz all over a christmas cracker when I think that we got Matic cheaper than what United got Failani !Perfect signing and we can all believe this really is a Mourinho signing because this time we have actually identified a weakness in our team and addressed it. HD3D 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....ps: go over and read the redcafe comments. hilarious...I'd also trust cbc here, cos in every employment contract they have a scan of the ID, so I rather think some internet sites fucked it up. Toli 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinineUltra 1,170 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I'd also trust cbc here, cos in every employment contract they have a scan of the ID, so I rather think some internet sites fucked it up. Serbian FA also say 01.08.1988 (http://www.fss.rs/index.php?id=3317&playid=106)Must be to do with how americans and the rest of the world write dates (01.08.1988 vs 08.01.1988) TacticalBlues, Barbara and Azpinator 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 No offence but why on earth are people discussing whether he's 25 or 26 years old now? Hardly a matter as long as we know he's born in 1988. Mouri_Matic, didierforever and sdrcfc 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 No offence but why on earth are people discussing whether he's 25 or 26 years old now? Hardly a matter as long as we know he's born in 1988.It would be strange if he were the same age as Mikel... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidEU 2,023 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Last player who could consistently win a header from an opposition long ball ahead of our centre backs? Ballack? I can see Matic improving a lot of the simple aspects within our midfield. Not saying for a minute that this guys going to set the league alight, he has a lot to prove, but this could be a very decent bit of business by Gourlay and Jose. Chelsea Legend 11 and Barbara 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 It would be strange if he were the same age as Mikel...Well, he is.Just checked Whoscored and Football Manager () and both had his birth date down on 1st August 1988. Chelsea Legend 11 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/jan/15/nemanja-matic-chelsea-midfield-jose-mourinho-benfica?CMP=twt_guJonathan Wilson on the signing of Matic...Nemanja Matic offers Chelsea midfield balance to correct £21m mistakeSerb is perfect fit for José Mourinho's lopsided squad after three years away from Stamford Bridge at finishing school with BenficaTwice a year, on transfer deadline day, English football is gripped by an incomprehensible mania but, even in that context, what happened at Stamford Bridge on 31 January 2011 stands out. Signing Fernando Torres for £50m was bad enough but letting Nemanja Matic leave as a makeweight in the deal that brought David Luiz to Chelsea now looks just as bad. Matic completed a £20.75m return to Stamford Bridge on Wednesday, which is an awful lot to pay for three years at finishing school.Chelsea, perhaps, deserve some sort of credit for swallowing their pride and it may be they considered the alternative to be even worse.Manchester United were very interested in the player in the summer, and however galling it may be to have to pay £21m to recover a player who was once your own, it would be even worse to see him reinvigorating an ailing rival.Matic, powerful and combative but good on the ball and capable of scoring goals, is exactly the dynamic midfielder United are lacking. Chelsea's immediate need for him is less obvious but it does perhaps indicate the direction in which José Mourinho is taking the squad.The decisive moment for the Chelsea manager seemed to be the 2-1 defeat to Sunderland in the Capital One Cup quarter-final in December. "We may have to take a step back in order to be more consistent at the back," he said "It's something I don't want to do, to play more counterattacking, but I'm giving it serious thought. If I want to win 1-0, I think I can, as I think it's one of the easiest things in football. It's not so difficult, as you don't give players the chance to express themselves."The suggestion was he would switch from the 4-2-3-1 he inherited from Rafa BenÃtez – and that he himself played at Internazionale and Real Madrid – and return to the 4-3-3 he had deployed so successfully in his first spell at the club.Sure enough, for the next game, away to Arsenal, he did just that, closing the game down with Mikel John Obi, Frank Lampard and Ramires in the middle, ensuring a stalemate. Since then the 4-2-3-1 has returned but so too has a steeliness that had dissipated in the autumn: in Chelsea's past six games in all competitions, they have conceded once, as though that quick re-immersion in 4-3-3 served as a reminder of defensive responsibility. Whether that means Mourinho sees 4-2-3-1 as the future is less clear.After all, this is a squad that has seemingly been designed – in as much as anything at Chelsea is designed – to play 4-2-3-1. There is an abundance of attacking midfielders – Eden Hazard, Oscar, Willian, Juan Mata, André Schürrle and Kevin De Bruyne (plus Victor Moses, on loan at Liverpool) – and few who can play at the back of midfield – Frank Lampard, Ramires, Mikel and Marco van Ginkel (plus David Luiz, although Mourinho has made clear he does not see him long-term as a midfielder). Playing a 4-2-3-1 means perming three from six creators and two from four deeper players, or three in Van Ginkel's absence, which is a lot healthier than perming two from six and three from four as would be the case with a 4-3-3.By bringing in Matic and selling De Bruyne to Wolfsburg, though, Mourinho changes that balance, and at least gives himself more options if he wants to play 4-3-3 more regularly – or, if he wants to carry on with 4-2-3-1 but use Ramires high on the right to check a marauding full-back, something BenÃtez did fairly frequently but which he has done only in the away defeat to Basel in the Champions League.It is easy to see why Matic appeals to Mourinho. At a touch over 6ft 4in, he is physically robust, and offers both a goal threat from set pieces and extra security in defending them – an area in which Chelsea were surprisingly deficient towards the end of last year. He is also mentally resilient. This, after all, is a player who was rejected repeatedly before finally finding regular first-team football at Benfica.Crvena Zvezda and Partizan Belgrade turned him down, so he was still playing third-flight football in Serbia with Jedinstvo Ub when he moved to the Slovakian club Kosice as a 19-year-old. He was fortunate there to be seen by Vladimir Vermezovic, a Serb coach who was working with Spartak Trnava.He recommended Matic to Serbia's Under-21 coach, Slobodan Krcmarevic and it was after impressing at the European 2009 Under-21 Championship in Sweden that he moved to Chelsea. He made only two appearances there – and 27 on loan at Vitesse Arnhem – though, before being off-loaded to Benfica.Even there it took some time to become a regular, but after Javi GarcÃa had moved to Manchester City he blossomed, with Jorge Jesus, then Benfica's coach, insisting he was a better in the holding midfield role than the Spaniard. The proof of that came in July when Matic was named Portugal's player of the season.At Benfica, Matic tended to play either as the lone holder in a 4-1-3-2 or as one of a pair of holders in a 4-2-3-1. In that sense he looks like direct competition for Mikel, the great survivor who seems to be rated by hardly anybody around Chelsea apart from Mourinho.It would be misleading to say Matic is a more complete player than Mikel, who has shown for Nigeria that he can play further forward, but it is certainly true to say that if he played alongside him, Matic would probably be the holder who stepped forward, and there is no reason why he could not play to the left of a central three.Given he is left footed, in fact, Matic may end up being Lampard's long-term replacement, although he will never offer the same late runs into the box or goalscoring record. He is such an obvious fit for this Chelsea midfield that it remains mystifying that he never got his chance first time round.However embarrassing it may appear, it could be that £21m is not too great a price to correct the error of that day in January 2011. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDY 1,290 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Matic himself even mentioned that he's 25 the other day IIRC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.